Acceptance or satisfaction of blended learning among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review of the literature

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106589
Wenjing Cao, Qi He, Qianqian Zhang, Yuan Tang, Chuan Chen, Yongmei He
{"title":"Acceptance or satisfaction of blended learning among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review of the literature","authors":"Wenjing Cao,&nbsp;Qi He,&nbsp;Qianqian Zhang,&nbsp;Yuan Tang,&nbsp;Chuan Chen,&nbsp;Yongmei He","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Blended learning is increasingly gaining popularity as an alternative method for delivering nursing education; however, there is no review regarding its acceptance or satisfaction among undergraduate nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aims to thoroughly explore and summarize the literature regarding the acceptance or satisfaction of blended learning among undergraduate nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a comprehensive search of EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus for English-language publications up to June 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search strategy identified 710 potentially relevant articles, from which 27 studies were ultimately included. Our findings underscore a scarcity of high-quality questionnaires assessing students' acceptance or satisfaction with blended learning. Notably, undergraduate nursing students generally express high satisfaction with blended learning. Factors influencing their acceptance or satisfaction include online platform browsing speed, teachers' abilities and instructional styles, preparation efforts, and students' information and communication technology skills.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Blended education holds promise as a future teaching method in nursing education, given its positive reception among undergraduate nursing students. However, this review emphasizes a significant issue: the insufficient availability of high-quality questionnaires to assess this population's acceptance or satisfaction with blended learning. Addressing this gap through further research is essential to enhance our understanding and ensure the effective implementation of blended learning in nursing education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 106589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725000243","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Blended learning is increasingly gaining popularity as an alternative method for delivering nursing education; however, there is no review regarding its acceptance or satisfaction among undergraduate nursing students.

Objective

This systematic review aims to thoroughly explore and summarize the literature regarding the acceptance or satisfaction of blended learning among undergraduate nursing students.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus for English-language publications up to June 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data.

Results

The search strategy identified 710 potentially relevant articles, from which 27 studies were ultimately included. Our findings underscore a scarcity of high-quality questionnaires assessing students' acceptance or satisfaction with blended learning. Notably, undergraduate nursing students generally express high satisfaction with blended learning. Factors influencing their acceptance or satisfaction include online platform browsing speed, teachers' abilities and instructional styles, preparation efforts, and students' information and communication technology skills.

Conclusion

Blended education holds promise as a future teaching method in nursing education, given its positive reception among undergraduate nursing students. However, this review emphasizes a significant issue: the insufficient availability of high-quality questionnaires to assess this population's acceptance or satisfaction with blended learning. Addressing this gap through further research is essential to enhance our understanding and ensure the effective implementation of blended learning in nursing education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Nursing curricula in Indonesia and Scandinavia: What can we learn from each other to strengthen nursing education Nursing in tune: Evaluation of the effectiveness of podcasts as an educational tool for undergraduate students - A cross-sectional study Editorial Board Registered nurses' experiences of the graduate nurse residency program: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1