Rhys Jones , Melissa McLeod , Ryan Gage , Alistair Woodward , Caroline Shaw
{"title":"Inequities in patterns and determinants of travel for Māori in Aotearoa/New Zealand","authors":"Rhys Jones , Melissa McLeod , Ryan Gage , Alistair Woodward , Caroline Shaw","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In Aotearoa New Zealand, substantial inequities exist between Māori (the Indigenous peoples) and non-Māori in a range of social outcomes. Transport-related inequities contribute to differences in life expectancy between Māori and non-Māori. Yet, no comprehensive analysis of ethnic differences in transportation mode use has been undertaken. This study aimed to describe patterns and determinants of travel among Māori and a comparator group (sole European).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analysed data for adults from the 2015/16–2017/18 New Zealand Household Travel Survey (HTS), which measured participants’ travel patterns and transport outcomes over the course of a week. Descriptive comparisons between Māori and Sole European are reported, and stepwise regression was used to examine the influence of covariates on mode-specific distance travelled by ethnicity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>943 Māori and 7329 Sole European participants were included in the analysis. Māori tended to travel fewer kilometres each week (223.2, 95% CI 194.5–251.8) compared to Sole European (246.2, 95% CI 237.4–255.0), although most comparisons had overlapping confidence intervals. After adjusting for all covariates, distances travelled by private motor vehicle were similar but Māori travelled significantly shorter distances on public transport and walking. The covariates that had the largest influence were age, occupation and area deprivation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Differences between Māori and Sole European in distances travelled were less pronounced than expected. Explanations for this could include survey limitations and/or requirements to use a car to participate in society, despite socioeconomic disadvantage. Our findings point to the need for transport policy and infrastructure to increase opportunities for Māori to use active travel modes. There is also a critical need for higher quality data to better characterise, understand and develop responses to address these transport-related inequities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101959"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524002056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
In Aotearoa New Zealand, substantial inequities exist between Māori (the Indigenous peoples) and non-Māori in a range of social outcomes. Transport-related inequities contribute to differences in life expectancy between Māori and non-Māori. Yet, no comprehensive analysis of ethnic differences in transportation mode use has been undertaken. This study aimed to describe patterns and determinants of travel among Māori and a comparator group (sole European).
Methods
We analysed data for adults from the 2015/16–2017/18 New Zealand Household Travel Survey (HTS), which measured participants’ travel patterns and transport outcomes over the course of a week. Descriptive comparisons between Māori and Sole European are reported, and stepwise regression was used to examine the influence of covariates on mode-specific distance travelled by ethnicity.
Results
943 Māori and 7329 Sole European participants were included in the analysis. Māori tended to travel fewer kilometres each week (223.2, 95% CI 194.5–251.8) compared to Sole European (246.2, 95% CI 237.4–255.0), although most comparisons had overlapping confidence intervals. After adjusting for all covariates, distances travelled by private motor vehicle were similar but Māori travelled significantly shorter distances on public transport and walking. The covariates that had the largest influence were age, occupation and area deprivation.
Conclusions
Differences between Māori and Sole European in distances travelled were less pronounced than expected. Explanations for this could include survey limitations and/or requirements to use a car to participate in society, despite socioeconomic disadvantage. Our findings point to the need for transport policy and infrastructure to increase opportunities for Māori to use active travel modes. There is also a critical need for higher quality data to better characterise, understand and develop responses to address these transport-related inequities.
在新西兰奥特罗阿,Māori(土著人民)和non-Māori之间在一系列社会成果方面存在着严重的不平等。与运输相关的不平等造成Māori和non-Māori之间预期寿命的差异。然而,没有对交通方式使用的种族差异进行全面分析。这项研究旨在描述Māori和一个比较组(唯一的欧洲人)之间旅行的模式和决定因素。我们分析了2015/16-2017/18新西兰家庭旅行调查(HTS)的成年人数据,该调查测量了参与者一周内的旅行模式和交通结果。报告了Māori和Sole European之间的描述性比较,并使用逐步回归来检查协变量对按种族的特定模式旅行距离的影响。结果943名Māori和7329名欧洲人被纳入分析。与Sole europe (246.2, 95% CI 237.4-255.0)相比,Māori倾向于每周行驶较少的公里(223.2,95% CI 194.5-251.8),尽管大多数比较具有重叠的置信区间。在对所有协变量进行调整后,乘坐私人机动车的距离相似,但Māori乘坐公共交通工具和步行的距离明显较短。影响最大的协变量是年龄、职业和面积剥夺。结论Māori和Sole European在旅行距离上的差异没有预期的那么明显。对此的解释可能包括调查限制和/或要求使用汽车参与社会,尽管社会经济劣势。我们的研究结果表明,需要交通政策和基础设施来增加Māori使用主动出行模式的机会。还迫切需要更高质量的数据,以便更好地描述、理解和制定应对措施,以解决这些与运输有关的不平等现象。