Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.001
Siobhan Botwright MA , Manit Sittimart MSc , Kinanti Khansa Chavarina MPH , Diana Beatriz Bayani PhD , Tracy Merlin PhD , Gavin Surgey MCom , Christian Suharlim MD, MPH , Manuel A. Espinoza MD, PhD , Anthony J. Culyer Hon DEcon , Wija Oortwijn PhD , Yot Teerawattananon MD, PhD
{"title":"Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force","authors":"Siobhan Botwright MA ,&nbsp;Manit Sittimart MSc ,&nbsp;Kinanti Khansa Chavarina MPH ,&nbsp;Diana Beatriz Bayani PhD ,&nbsp;Tracy Merlin PhD ,&nbsp;Gavin Surgey MCom ,&nbsp;Christian Suharlim MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Manuel A. Espinoza MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Anthony J. Culyer Hon DEcon ,&nbsp;Wija Oortwijn PhD ,&nbsp;Yot Teerawattananon MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines are intended to support successful implementation of HTA by enhancing consistency and transparency in concepts, methods, process, and use, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of the decision-making process. This report lays out good practices and practical recommendations for developing or updating HTA guidelines to ensure successful implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The task force was established in 2022 and comprised experts and academics from various geographical regions, each with substantial experience in developing HTA guidelines for national health policymaking. Literature reviews and key-informant interviews were conducted to inform these good practices. Stakeholder consultations, open peer reviews, and expert opinions validated the recommendations. A series of teleconferences among task force members was held to iteratively refine the report.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The recommendations cover 6 key aspects throughout the guideline development cycle: (1) setting objectives, scope, and principles of the guideline, (2) building a team for a quality guideline, (3) defining a stakeholder engagement plan, (iv) developing content and utilizing available resources, (v) putting in place appropriate institutional arrangements, and (vi) monitoring and evaluating guideline success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This report presents a set of resources and context-appropriate practices for developing or updating HTA guidelines. Across all contexts, the recommendations emphasize transparency, building trust among stakeholders, and fostering a culture of ongoing learning and improvement. The report recommends timing development and revision of guidelines according to the HTA landscape and pace of HTA institutionalization. Because HTA is increasingly used to inform different kinds of decision making in a variety of country contexts, it will be important to continue to monitor lessons learned to ensure the recommendations remain relevant and effective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":"28 1","pages":"Pages 1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301524028481","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines are intended to support successful implementation of HTA by enhancing consistency and transparency in concepts, methods, process, and use, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of the decision-making process. This report lays out good practices and practical recommendations for developing or updating HTA guidelines to ensure successful implementation.

Methods

The task force was established in 2022 and comprised experts and academics from various geographical regions, each with substantial experience in developing HTA guidelines for national health policymaking. Literature reviews and key-informant interviews were conducted to inform these good practices. Stakeholder consultations, open peer reviews, and expert opinions validated the recommendations. A series of teleconferences among task force members was held to iteratively refine the report.

Results

The recommendations cover 6 key aspects throughout the guideline development cycle: (1) setting objectives, scope, and principles of the guideline, (2) building a team for a quality guideline, (3) defining a stakeholder engagement plan, (iv) developing content and utilizing available resources, (v) putting in place appropriate institutional arrangements, and (vi) monitoring and evaluating guideline success.

Conclusion

This report presents a set of resources and context-appropriate practices for developing or updating HTA guidelines. Across all contexts, the recommendations emphasize transparency, building trust among stakeholders, and fostering a culture of ongoing learning and improvement. The report recommends timing development and revision of guidelines according to the HTA landscape and pace of HTA institutionalization. Because HTA is increasingly used to inform different kinds of decision making in a variety of country contexts, it will be important to continue to monitor lessons learned to ensure the recommendations remain relevant and effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定卫生技术评估准则的良好做法:卫生技术评估国际、HTAsiaLink和ISPOR特别工作组的报告
目的卫生技术评估(HTA)指南旨在通过提高概念、方法、过程和使用的一致性和透明度来支持HTA的成功实施,从而提高决策过程的合法性。本报告列出了制定或更新HTA指南的良好做法和实用建议,以确保成功实施。方法该工作组成立于2022年,由来自不同地理区域的专家和学者组成,每位专家和学者都在为国家卫生政策制定制定HTA指南方面具有丰富的经验。进行文献回顾和关键信息提供者访谈,以告知这些良好做法。利益相关者协商、公开同行评审和专家意见验证了这些建议。工作组成员举行了一系列电话会议,反复完善报告。结果这些建议涵盖了整个指南制定周期的6个关键方面:(1)设定指南的目标、范围和原则;(2)为质量指南建立团队;(3)定义利益相关者参与计划;(iv)制定内容和利用现有资源;(v)制定适当的制度安排;(vi)监测和评估指南的成功。本报告为制定或更新HTA指南提供了一套资源和适合具体情况的实践。在所有情况下,这些建议强调透明度,在利益相关者之间建立信任,并培养持续学习和改进的文化。报告建议根据HTA的格局和HTA制度化的步伐制定和修订指南的时机。由于HTA越来越多地用于为各种国家情况下的各种决策提供信息,因此必须继续监测所吸取的经验教训,以确保建议保持相关性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Validation and Clinical Meaningfulness of the 18-item National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (NCCN-FACT) Lymphoma Symptom Index (NFLymSI-18) in Patients with Lymphoma. A systematic review of quantitative health preference methods to support value clarification and shared-decision making: A report of an ISPOR special interest group. Author Reply. Eliciting Societal Preferences for Health Equity: Reflections on Health Inequality Aversion in the United States. Impact of Smoothing and Modeling Approach on Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy Estimates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1