Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and risk of neurologic disease

IF 2.9 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Rhythm O2 Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.11.004
Mohammed Al-Sadawi MBBCh, Nithi Tokavanich MD, Jasneet Devgun MD, Michael Ghannam MD, Rakesh Latchamsetty MD, Krit Jongsarangsin MD, Hakan Oral MD
{"title":"Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and risk of neurologic disease","authors":"Mohammed Al-Sadawi MBBCh,&nbsp;Nithi Tokavanich MD,&nbsp;Jasneet Devgun MD,&nbsp;Michael Ghannam MD,&nbsp;Rakesh Latchamsetty MD,&nbsp;Krit Jongsarangsin MD,&nbsp;Hakan Oral MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been proven to benefit patients with symptomatic AF and heart failure. However, the data on neurological outcomes including cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) and dementia remain controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to determine the effect of CA on neurological events during long-term follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with AF who underwent CA of AF. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched from inception to January 2024. Studies that reported incidence of CVA and dementia in patients with AF were. Data from each study were combined by a random-effects model. The results were reported in risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 29 studies and 379,993 patients (mean age 58 ± 4 years, 30% women) were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 36 ± 23 months (range 12–120 months). Patients who underwent CA of AF had a lower risk of developing CVA compared with medical management (odds ratio [OR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.42–0 69, I<sup>2</sup> = 91%). Moreover, the risk of dementia was lower in the CA group compared with medical management (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.4–0.66, I<sup>2</sup> = 74%). The incidence of CVA in the CA group was 1% (95% CI 1%–2%, I<sup>2</sup> = 97%), and the incidence of dementia was 2% (95% CI 2%–8%, I<sup>2</sup> = 97%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CA of AF resulted in lower risk of CVA and dementia compared with medical management alone at long-term follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 32-38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824003726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been proven to benefit patients with symptomatic AF and heart failure. However, the data on neurological outcomes including cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) and dementia remain controversial.

Objective

We aimed to determine the effect of CA on neurological events during long-term follow-up.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with AF who underwent CA of AF. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched from inception to January 2024. Studies that reported incidence of CVA and dementia in patients with AF were. Data from each study were combined by a random-effects model. The results were reported in risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 29 studies and 379,993 patients (mean age 58 ± 4 years, 30% women) were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 36 ± 23 months (range 12–120 months). Patients who underwent CA of AF had a lower risk of developing CVA compared with medical management (odds ratio [OR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.42–0 69, I2 = 91%). Moreover, the risk of dementia was lower in the CA group compared with medical management (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.4–0.66, I2 = 74%). The incidence of CVA in the CA group was 1% (95% CI 1%–2%, I2 = 97%), and the incidence of dementia was 2% (95% CI 2%–8%, I2 = 97%).

Conclusion

CA of AF resulted in lower risk of CVA and dementia compared with medical management alone at long-term follow-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导管消融治疗心房颤动和神经系统疾病的风险
背景:心房颤动(AF)的导管消融(CA)已被证明对有症状的房颤(AF)和心力衰竭患者有益。然而,包括脑血管意外(CVA)和痴呆在内的神经系统预后数据仍存在争议。目的在长期随访中确定CA对神经系统事件的影响。方法我们对房颤患者进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,并对MEDLINE、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库进行了全面检索,检索时间从成立到2024年1月。报道房颤患者CVA和痴呆发生率的研究有。每项研究的数据都通过随机效应模型进行组合。结果以95%置信区间(ci)的风险比报告。结果共纳入29项研究,379993例患者(平均年龄58±4岁,女性占30%)。平均随访36±23个月(12 ~ 120个月)。与内科治疗相比,房颤CA患者发生CVA的风险较低(优势比[OR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.42 - 0.69, I2 = 91%)。此外,与医疗管理相比,CA组痴呆的风险更低(OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.4-0.66, I2 = 74%)。CA组CVA发生率为1% (95% CI 1% ~ 2%, I2 = 97%),痴呆发生率为2% (95% CI 2% ~ 8%, I2 = 97%)。结论在长期随访中,与单纯药物治疗相比,房颤ca治疗导致CVA和痴呆的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Laser vs rotational transvenous lead extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of procedural safety and efficacy outcomes A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation vs antiarrhythmic therapy as a first-line treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation: The AVANT GUARD trial rationale and design Adherence to consensus-based implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and impact on therapy delivery in clinical practice: A national cohort study Skin sympathetic nerve activity and nocturnal septal ST-segment elevation Evolving modalities of atrial fibrillation ablation: From thermal to nonthermal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1