Postgraduate Critical Care Nursing Students’ Experiences of Simulation Working With the Same Simulated Participant: A Qualitative Evaluation

IF 1.7 Q2 NURSING Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.08.017
Siobhan Brereton , Kate O'Donovan , Hazel Ní Chonchubhair , Lisa Rogers
{"title":"Postgraduate Critical Care Nursing Students’ Experiences of Simulation Working With the Same Simulated Participant: A Qualitative Evaluation","authors":"Siobhan Brereton ,&nbsp;Kate O'Donovan ,&nbsp;Hazel Ní Chonchubhair ,&nbsp;Lisa Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The integration of simulation into nursing curricula has supported to bridge the nursing theory-practice gap. While the effectiveness of this approach has been established among undergraduate students, a comprehensive understanding of postgraduate nursing students’ experiences of this learning approach is limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to explore postgraduate nursing students’ experiences of working with a simulated participant.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A qualitative descriptive study using an open-ended questionnaire was used. Thematic analysis using an inductive approach analyzed the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two themes are presented under the headings: 1) Considerations for enhancing the student experience; and 2) Back to basics: the core mechanism driving learning in simulation-based learning. The findings emphasize the importance of enhancing psychological safety, and recognizing student learning preferences when planning simulation activities. The results also uncover the patient voice and peer learning as mechanisms encouraging greater knowledge acquisition and engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>By exposing areas for improvement in simulation-based education and the mechanisms that drive postgraduate student learning, this research supports the improved design of simulation activities, further bridging the nursing theory-practice gap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 1","pages":"Pages e118-e124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155730872400180X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The integration of simulation into nursing curricula has supported to bridge the nursing theory-practice gap. While the effectiveness of this approach has been established among undergraduate students, a comprehensive understanding of postgraduate nursing students’ experiences of this learning approach is limited.

Objectives

This study aims to explore postgraduate nursing students’ experiences of working with a simulated participant.

Design

A qualitative descriptive study using an open-ended questionnaire was used. Thematic analysis using an inductive approach analyzed the data.

Results

Two themes are presented under the headings: 1) Considerations for enhancing the student experience; and 2) Back to basics: the core mechanism driving learning in simulation-based learning. The findings emphasize the importance of enhancing psychological safety, and recognizing student learning preferences when planning simulation activities. The results also uncover the patient voice and peer learning as mechanisms encouraging greater knowledge acquisition and engagement.

Conclusions

By exposing areas for improvement in simulation-based education and the mechanisms that drive postgraduate student learning, this research supports the improved design of simulation activities, further bridging the nursing theory-practice gap.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重护理研究生与同一模拟参与者的模拟工作经验:定性评价
背景将模拟融入护理课程有助于弥合护理理论与实践之间的差距。虽然这种方法在本科生中的有效性已经得到证实,但对护理研究生对这种学习方法的体验的全面了解还很有限。研究目的本研究旨在探讨护理研究生与模拟参与者一起工作的体验。采用归纳法对数据进行主题分析:1) 提升学生体验的考虑因素;2) 回归基础:驱动模拟学习的核心机制。研究结果强调了加强心理安全的重要性,以及在规划模拟活动时认识到学生学习偏好的重要性。结论 通过揭示模拟教育中需要改进的地方以及推动研究生学习的机制,本研究支持改进模拟活动的设计,进一步缩小护理理论与实践之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
期刊最新文献
Response to embedding joy in nursing education: A framework for resilience and professional sustainability Corrigendum to “Attitudes and anxiety levels of nursing students toward artificial intelligence” Teaching and Learning in Nursing 20 (2025) e431–e438 Corrigendum to “Embedding Joy in Nursing Education: A Framework for Resilience and Professional Sustainability” Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 20 (2025) 199–200 New partnership establishes simulation grant award A year of purpose, progress, and possibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1