Analyzing the role of main energy transition policies upon renewable energy penetration in the EU: An assessment of energy productivity and low carbon economies

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2024.100573
Gonzalo H. Soto , Xuan-Hoa Nghiem , Xavier Martinez-Cobas
{"title":"Analyzing the role of main energy transition policies upon renewable energy penetration in the EU: An assessment of energy productivity and low carbon economies","authors":"Gonzalo H. Soto ,&nbsp;Xuan-Hoa Nghiem ,&nbsp;Xavier Martinez-Cobas","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we examine the relationship between various variables related to the transition process toward green economies outlined in the European Green Deal guidelines among member countries of the European Union. The two primary variables of interest are energy productivity and low carbon economies between 2004 and 2022 upon renewable energy penetration. By employing fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) and canonical cointegrating regression (CCR) estimation methods and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) for robustness, we conclude that energy productivity discourages the use of renewable energy among European countries, having a negative effect on the utilization of said energy estimated at a decrease of renewable energy use by 0.24% for each 10% increase in energy productivity. On the other hand, the transition process toward less fossil fuel-dependent energy contributes to a greater utilization of renewable energy, with a 0.11% increase for each 10% increase in the use of renewable energy over fossil fuels. Within this analytical framework, we observe that the positive correlation between energy productivity and environmental sustainability does not stem from an uptick in renewable energy integration. Instead, it arises from a reduction in energy inputs within the broader productivity framework. Concurrently, the transition towards greener energy landscapes aims not merely to curtail overall energy consumption but to initiate a strategic process of substituting conventional fuel sources with renewable alternatives, thereby fostering environmental enhancement through energy source diversification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100573"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724002411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we examine the relationship between various variables related to the transition process toward green economies outlined in the European Green Deal guidelines among member countries of the European Union. The two primary variables of interest are energy productivity and low carbon economies between 2004 and 2022 upon renewable energy penetration. By employing fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) and canonical cointegrating regression (CCR) estimation methods and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) for robustness, we conclude that energy productivity discourages the use of renewable energy among European countries, having a negative effect on the utilization of said energy estimated at a decrease of renewable energy use by 0.24% for each 10% increase in energy productivity. On the other hand, the transition process toward less fossil fuel-dependent energy contributes to a greater utilization of renewable energy, with a 0.11% increase for each 10% increase in the use of renewable energy over fossil fuels. Within this analytical framework, we observe that the positive correlation between energy productivity and environmental sustainability does not stem from an uptick in renewable energy integration. Instead, it arises from a reduction in energy inputs within the broader productivity framework. Concurrently, the transition towards greener energy landscapes aims not merely to curtail overall energy consumption but to initiate a strategic process of substituting conventional fuel sources with renewable alternatives, thereby fostering environmental enhancement through energy source diversification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在本研究中,我们研究了与欧盟成员国向《欧洲绿色协议》指导方针中概述的绿色经济转型过程有关的各种变量之间的关系。我们关注的两个主要变量是 2004 年至 2022 年间可再生能源普及后的能源生产率和低碳经济。通过采用完全修正普通最小二乘法(FMOLS)和典型协整回归(CCR)估算方法以及动态普通最小二乘法(DOLS)进行稳健性估算,我们得出结论:能源生产率阻碍了欧洲国家对可再生能源的使用,对上述能源的利用产生了负面影响,估计能源生产率每提高 10%,可再生能源的使用就会减少 0.24%。另一方面,减少对化石燃料依赖的转型过程有助于提高可再生能源的利用率,可再生能源的利用率每提高 10%,化石燃料的利用率就会提高 0.11%。在这一分析框架内,我们发现,能源生产率与环境可持续性之间的正相关关系并非源于可再生能源集成度的提高。相反,它产生于更广泛的生产力框架内能源投入的减少。同时,向绿色能源景观过渡的目的不仅仅是减少总体能源消耗,而是启动一个用可再生替代品替代传统燃料来源的战略进程,从而通过能源来源多样化促进环境改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Soil quality dynamics in response to land-use management types and slope positions in northeastern highlands of Ethiopia Understanding flood and drought extremes under a changing climate in the Blue Nile Basin: A review Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in technology revolution 5.0: New insights in Vietnam The carbon footprint of football fans: Emotional and rational correlates of home and away game travel Fisheries performance indicators for assessing the ecological sustainability of wild-caught seafood products in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1