Integrated assessment of environmental suitability and water-energy conflict for optimizing solar energy in Northwest China's desert regions

IF 5.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2024.100564
Weike Zhao , Zhangxinyue Zhao , Wenjuan Hou , Dezheng Jiang , Kaijin Zhang , Xueliang Zhang
{"title":"Integrated assessment of environmental suitability and water-energy conflict for optimizing solar energy in Northwest China's desert regions","authors":"Weike Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhangxinyue Zhao ,&nbsp;Wenjuan Hou ,&nbsp;Dezheng Jiang ,&nbsp;Kaijin Zhang ,&nbsp;Xueliang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the environmental suitability and water resource impact of photovoltaic (PV) and concentrated solar power (CSP) systems in the desert regions of Northwest China. A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach is employed, integrating seven key indicators that encompass climate, geography, and location perspectives. Methods such as AHP, CRITIC, CVM, IWC, and EWM are integrated into the MCDA system, with sensitivity analysis conducted to ensure the robustness of weight coefficients. Additionally, the study employs the Water Resource Pressure (WRP) index and spatial Gini coefficient to quantify the Water-Energy conflict. The findings indicate that the Tengger and Kumtag Deserts exhibit higher environmental suitability, lower water resource pressure, and favorable spatial equilibrium, making them optimal for PV and CSP development. In contrast, the Ulan Buh, Badain Jaran, and Qaidam Deserts face significant water resource pressures, necessitating careful planning to avoid ecological impacts. This study introduces a comprehensive framework that combines suitability assessments with water resource evaluations at a fine spatial scale of 0.25-degree grids. The proposed “Water-Electricity-Road” network framework addresses water scarcity and infrastructure accessibility, thereby optimizing solar energy utilization in desert regions. These insights offer valuable guidance for sustainable solar energy planning in arid regions globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100564"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724002320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental suitability and water resource impact of photovoltaic (PV) and concentrated solar power (CSP) systems in the desert regions of Northwest China. A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach is employed, integrating seven key indicators that encompass climate, geography, and location perspectives. Methods such as AHP, CRITIC, CVM, IWC, and EWM are integrated into the MCDA system, with sensitivity analysis conducted to ensure the robustness of weight coefficients. Additionally, the study employs the Water Resource Pressure (WRP) index and spatial Gini coefficient to quantify the Water-Energy conflict. The findings indicate that the Tengger and Kumtag Deserts exhibit higher environmental suitability, lower water resource pressure, and favorable spatial equilibrium, making them optimal for PV and CSP development. In contrast, the Ulan Buh, Badain Jaran, and Qaidam Deserts face significant water resource pressures, necessitating careful planning to avoid ecological impacts. This study introduces a comprehensive framework that combines suitability assessments with water resource evaluations at a fine spatial scale of 0.25-degree grids. The proposed “Water-Electricity-Road” network framework addresses water scarcity and infrastructure accessibility, thereby optimizing solar energy utilization in desert regions. These insights offer valuable guidance for sustainable solar energy planning in arid regions globally.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西北荒漠地区太阳能优化利用的环境适宜性与水能冲突综合评价
本文对西北荒漠地区光伏发电和聚光太阳能发电系统的环境适宜性和水资源影响进行了评价。采用多标准决策分析(MCDA)方法,整合了包括气候、地理和位置视角在内的七个关键指标。将AHP、CRITIC、CVM、IWC、EWM等方法整合到MCDA体系中,并进行敏感性分析,确保权重系数的鲁棒性。此外,本研究还采用水资源压力指数和空间基尼系数来量化水资源-能源冲突。研究结果表明,腾格里沙漠和库姆塔格沙漠具有较高的环境适宜性、较低的水资源压力和良好的空间均衡性,是光伏和光热发电发展的最佳选择。而乌兰布和沙漠、巴丹吉林沙漠和柴达木沙漠则面临着巨大的水资源压力,需要谨慎规划以避免生态影响。本研究在0.25度网格的精细空间尺度上引入了适宜性评价与水资源评价相结合的综合框架。拟议的“水-电-路”网络框架解决了水资源短缺和基础设施可及性问题,从而优化了沙漠地区的太阳能利用。这些见解为全球干旱地区的可持续太阳能规划提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Sulphur addition has negative impacts on individual species abundance in natural plant species communities Understanding climate change-induced drought shocks and coping strategies of farmers in the Barind Tract Region, Bangladesh Impacts of climate change on water resources and farming community adaptation strategies in southwestern Ethiopia Citizen science data reliability enhancing scientific research: insights from an 11-year study in the Mediterranean Sea Tracking important site safeguard through different approaches to measuring the indicator of protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1