Thoughtful or thoughtless? Asymmetric attitudes of gift-givers and gift-recipients toward overpackaged gifts

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2024.10.002
Haijiao Shi , Rong Chen , Bingqing (Miranda) Yin
{"title":"Thoughtful or thoughtless? Asymmetric attitudes of gift-givers and gift-recipients toward overpackaged gifts","authors":"Haijiao Shi ,&nbsp;Rong Chen ,&nbsp;Bingqing (Miranda) Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gift packaging plays an important role in gift-giving. In recent years, there has been an increase in the prevalence of overpackaged gifts. The current research explores how gift-givers and gift-recipients evaluate an overpackaged gift asymmetrically. Across five studies and four supplementary studies, we demonstrate that gift-givers prefer overpackaged gifts and evaluate them more positively than regularly packaged gifts. Conversely, gift-recipients prefer regularly packaged gifts and evaluate overpackaged gifts less positively. This is because gift-givers use overpackaging to signal their thoughtfulness, whereas gift-recipients may interpret overpackaging as a signal of the giver's lack of thoughtfulness (i.e., prioritizing packaging over the gift itself). We further demonstrate that these asymmetric attitudes toward overpackaged gifts between givers and recipients are influenced by gift-giving occasions and social closeness. Specifically, this discrepancy becomes more pronounced in obligatory occasions or when there is a greater social distance between givers and recipients. This research highlights a novel preference discrepancy in gift-giving: the perception and evaluation mismatch of overpackaging between gift-givers and gift-recipients. We provide insights for consumers and offer actionable guidance for gift-giving retailers regarding the design of gift packaging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":"100 4","pages":"Pages 656-672"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243592400068X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gift packaging plays an important role in gift-giving. In recent years, there has been an increase in the prevalence of overpackaged gifts. The current research explores how gift-givers and gift-recipients evaluate an overpackaged gift asymmetrically. Across five studies and four supplementary studies, we demonstrate that gift-givers prefer overpackaged gifts and evaluate them more positively than regularly packaged gifts. Conversely, gift-recipients prefer regularly packaged gifts and evaluate overpackaged gifts less positively. This is because gift-givers use overpackaging to signal their thoughtfulness, whereas gift-recipients may interpret overpackaging as a signal of the giver's lack of thoughtfulness (i.e., prioritizing packaging over the gift itself). We further demonstrate that these asymmetric attitudes toward overpackaged gifts between givers and recipients are influenced by gift-giving occasions and social closeness. Specifically, this discrepancy becomes more pronounced in obligatory occasions or when there is a greater social distance between givers and recipients. This research highlights a novel preference discrepancy in gift-giving: the perception and evaluation mismatch of overpackaging between gift-givers and gift-recipients. We provide insights for consumers and offer actionable guidance for gift-giving retailers regarding the design of gift packaging.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
周到还是不周到?送礼者和受礼者对过度包装礼物的不对称态度
礼品包装在送礼中扮演着重要角色。近年来,过度包装的礼品越来越普遍。目前的研究探讨了送礼者和受礼者如何对过度包装的礼品进行非对称评价。通过五项研究和四项补充研究,我们证明送礼者更喜欢过度包装的礼品,对它们的评价比普通包装的礼品更积极。相反,受礼者更喜欢普通包装的礼品,而对过度包装礼品的评价则不那么积极。这是因为送礼者利用过度包装来表达他们的体贴,而受礼者则可能将过度包装理解为送礼者缺乏体贴的信号(即包装优先于礼物本身)。我们进一步证明,送礼者和受礼者对过度包装礼物的不对称态度会受到送礼场合和社交亲密程度的影响。具体来说,在强制性场合或送礼者与收礼者之间的社会距离较大时,这种差异会变得更加明显。这项研究强调了送礼中一种新的偏好差异:送礼者和收礼者对过度包装的感知和评价不匹配。我们为消费者提供了见解,并为礼品零售商提供了有关礼品包装设计的可行指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.
期刊最新文献
Sell on, sell to, or sell through: The sales performance implications of brand-platform selling arrangements Not-so-speedy delivery: Should retailers use discounts or donations to incentivize consumers to choose delayed delivery? Can I choose my offer? How choice of a promotional offer impacts consumer evaluations and decisions Wearing your success on your sleeve: How salesperson luxury brand consumption affects consumers’ perceptions Explaining physical retail store closures in digital times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1