Effectiveness of information technology-based cognitive behavioral therapy on depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General hospital psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.12.022
Yufei Qiu , Man Wu , Jiali Liu , Chaoyang Li , Yiqing Yu , Lijuan Zeng , Fen Yang , Xiaohong Zhang , Gang Chen
{"title":"Effectiveness of information technology-based cognitive behavioral therapy on depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yufei Qiu ,&nbsp;Man Wu ,&nbsp;Jiali Liu ,&nbsp;Chaoyang Li ,&nbsp;Yiqing Yu ,&nbsp;Lijuan Zeng ,&nbsp;Fen Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaohong Zhang ,&nbsp;Gang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.12.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Depression and anxiety are prevalent among older adults. However, most older adults have poor access to age-specific mental health services. While Information technology-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT) has shown promise as an accessible alternative to face-to-face interventions, its effectiveness specifically within the older adults warrants further investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effectiveness of ICBT on depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Research articles retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception to April 10, 2024, were reviewed. The search was designed to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of ICBT in reducing self-reported depression or anxiety symptoms in older adults. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, version 2.0. Posttreatment means and standard deviations (SDs) were compared between intervention and control groups, and pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 11 RCTs were eligible for inclusion in this review. Compared to control groups, ICBT yielded small to medium post-treatment pooled effect sizes regarding depressive symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.65, 95 % CI −0.95 to −0.35; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.47, 95 % CI −0.74 to −0.19; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that: (1) interventions lasting ≥8 weeks (Hedges' g = −0.88, 95 % CI −1.37 to −0.39; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) were more effective than &lt;8 weeks for depressive symptoms; however, &lt;8 weeks (Hedges' g = −0.52, 95 % CI −0.93 to −0.10; <em>P =</em> 0.014) was more effective for anxiety symptoms; (2) ICBT delivered through slideshows was more effective than through other digital platforms for both depressive (Hedges' g = −1.36, 95 % CI −2.40 to −0.31; <em>P</em> = 0.011) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −1.00, 95 % CI −1.30 to −0.70; <em>P</em> <em>&lt;</em> 0.001); and (3) non-tailored ICBT was more effective than tailored versions for both depressive (Hedges' g = −1.06, 95 % CI −2.03 to −0.09; <em>P =</em> 0.032) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.70, 95 % CI −1.14 to −0.27; <em>P</em> = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This meta-analysis reinforces the effectiveness of ICBT in relieving depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults. Future research should identify the most effective components of ICBT to optimize their development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 9-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834324002676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Depression and anxiety are prevalent among older adults. However, most older adults have poor access to age-specific mental health services. While Information technology-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT) has shown promise as an accessible alternative to face-to-face interventions, its effectiveness specifically within the older adults warrants further investigation.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of ICBT on depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults.

Methods

Research articles retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception to April 10, 2024, were reviewed. The search was designed to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of ICBT in reducing self-reported depression or anxiety symptoms in older adults. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, version 2.0. Posttreatment means and standard deviations (SDs) were compared between intervention and control groups, and pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated.

Results

A total of 11 RCTs were eligible for inclusion in this review. Compared to control groups, ICBT yielded small to medium post-treatment pooled effect sizes regarding depressive symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.65, 95 % CI −0.95 to −0.35; P < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.47, 95 % CI −0.74 to −0.19; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that: (1) interventions lasting ≥8 weeks (Hedges' g = −0.88, 95 % CI −1.37 to −0.39; P < 0.001) were more effective than <8 weeks for depressive symptoms; however, <8 weeks (Hedges' g = −0.52, 95 % CI −0.93 to −0.10; P = 0.014) was more effective for anxiety symptoms; (2) ICBT delivered through slideshows was more effective than through other digital platforms for both depressive (Hedges' g = −1.36, 95 % CI −2.40 to −0.31; P = 0.011) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −1.00, 95 % CI −1.30 to −0.70; P < 0.001); and (3) non-tailored ICBT was more effective than tailored versions for both depressive (Hedges' g = −1.06, 95 % CI −2.03 to −0.09; P = 0.032) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.70, 95 % CI −1.14 to −0.27; P = 0.001).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis reinforces the effectiveness of ICBT in relieving depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults. Future research should identify the most effective components of ICBT to optimize their development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于信息技术的认知行为疗法对老年人抑郁和焦虑症状的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:抑郁和焦虑在老年人中很普遍。然而,大多数老年人很难获得针对其年龄的心理健康服务。虽然基于信息技术的认知行为疗法(ICBT)已经显示出作为面对面干预的一种可访问的替代方案的希望,但其在老年人中的有效性值得进一步研究。目的评价ICBT对老年人抑郁、焦虑症状的治疗效果。方法对从PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、PsycINFO、MEDLINE等数据库中检索到的从建站到2024年4月10日的研究文章进行分析。该研究旨在确定随机对照试验(RCTs),以检验ICBT在减少老年人自我报告的抑郁或焦虑症状方面的功效。纳入研究的质量采用Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚工具2.0版进行评估。比较干预组和对照组的治疗后均值和标准差(sd),并计算合并效应量(Hedges’g)。结果共有11项rct符合纳入本综述的条件。与对照组相比,ICBT对抑郁症状产生了小到中等的治疗后综合效应(Hedges’g = - 0.65, 95% CI - 0.95至- 0.35;P & lt;0.001)和焦虑症状(Hedges' g = - 0.47, 95% CI - 0.74至- 0.19;P & lt;0.001)。亚组分析显示:(1)干预持续≥8周(Hedges’g = - 0.88, 95% CI = - 1.37 ~ - 0.39);P & lt;0.001)治疗抑郁症状的效果优于8周治疗;然而,<;8周(对冲系数g = - 0.52, 95% CI - 0.93至- 0.10;P = 0.014)对焦虑症状更有效;(2)通过幻灯片提供的ICBT比通过其他数字平台对两种抑郁症更有效(赫奇斯的g = - 1.36, 95% CI为- 2.40至- 0.31;P = 0.011)和焦虑症状(Hedges' g = - 1.00, 95% CI = - 1.30 ~ - 0.70;P & lt;0.001);(3)对于两种抑郁症,非定制ICBT比定制ICBT更有效(Hedges' g = - 1.06, 95% CI为- 2.03至- 0.09;P = 0.032)和焦虑症状(Hedges' g = - 0.70, 95% CI = - 1.14至- 0.27;p = 0.001)。结论:本荟萃分析强化了ICBT在缓解老年人抑郁和焦虑症状方面的有效性。未来的研究应确定ICBT最有效的组成部分,以优化其发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Advancing cancer neuroscience through stress modulation: Interdisciplinary potential of psilocybin and ketamine Predictive role of loneliness on 10-year all-cause mortality among mid-to later-life adults in the United States: findings from the Health and Retirement Study Response to letter to the editor regarding: Trends in the development of suicide attempts and mood disorders following acute myocardial infarction: A decade-long analysis Critical appraisal of the multi-state model in smoking research: Causal claims and the shadow of immortal time bias Letter to “Clinical and biological distinctions between catatonia due to a medical condition and catatonia associated with a psychiatric disorder”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1