Dispelling Accreditation Myths to Enhance Nursing Education

IF 1.7 Q2 NURSING Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.08.016
Brooke McAtee PhD, RN , Teresa Shellenbarger PhD, RN, CNE, CNEcl, ANEF , Jennifer Chicca PhD, RN, CNE, CNEcl
{"title":"Dispelling Accreditation Myths to Enhance Nursing Education","authors":"Brooke McAtee PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Teresa Shellenbarger PhD, RN, CNE, CNEcl, ANEF ,&nbsp;Jennifer Chicca PhD, RN, CNE, CNEcl","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Programmatic accreditation validates the quality of nursing education, ensuring programs meet rigorous standards and prepare competent graduates ready to effectively contribute to the healthcare workforce. Faculty are essential to the success of accreditation activities, yet educators can feel overwhelmed with these activities as they may lack needed knowledge, skills, and abilities to complete accreditation tasks. Faculty may also have misunderstandings about accreditation. These accreditation myths can hinder program data collection and decision-making thus leading to unfavorable accreditation reviews that may negatively impact program stakeholders. This article examines and dispels myths associated with programmatic accreditation. By dispelling myths, faculty can enhance accurate understanding of accreditation processes, promote successful reviews, and advance nursing education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 1","pages":"Pages 20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Programmatic accreditation validates the quality of nursing education, ensuring programs meet rigorous standards and prepare competent graduates ready to effectively contribute to the healthcare workforce. Faculty are essential to the success of accreditation activities, yet educators can feel overwhelmed with these activities as they may lack needed knowledge, skills, and abilities to complete accreditation tasks. Faculty may also have misunderstandings about accreditation. These accreditation myths can hinder program data collection and decision-making thus leading to unfavorable accreditation reviews that may negatively impact program stakeholders. This article examines and dispels myths associated with programmatic accreditation. By dispelling myths, faculty can enhance accurate understanding of accreditation processes, promote successful reviews, and advance nursing education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
破除评审误区,加强护理教育
项目认证验证护理教育的质量,确保项目符合严格的标准,并准备有能力的毕业生准备有效地为医疗保健劳动力做出贡献。教师对认证活动的成功至关重要,然而教育工作者可能会感到这些活动不堪重负,因为他们可能缺乏完成认证任务所需的知识、技能和能力。教师也可能对认证有误解。这些认证神话可能阻碍项目数据收集和决策,从而导致不利的认证审查,可能对项目利益相关者产生负面影响。这篇文章检查和消除与方案认证相关的神话。通过消除神话,教师可以加强对认证过程的准确理解,促进成功的审查,并推进护理教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
期刊最新文献
The ADN Pathway: A Vital Access Point for Nursing's Future New partnership establishes simulation grant award A year of purpose, progress, and possibility The faculty factor: Faculty engagement and retention in accreditation renewal From statistics to mastery: Rethinking item analysis for competency-based nursing education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1