{"title":"Dispelling Accreditation Myths to Enhance Nursing Education","authors":"Brooke McAtee PhD, RN , Teresa Shellenbarger PhD, RN, CNE, CNEcl, ANEF , Jennifer Chicca PhD, RN, CNE, CNEcl","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Programmatic accreditation validates the quality of nursing education, ensuring programs meet rigorous standards and prepare competent graduates ready to effectively contribute to the healthcare workforce. Faculty are essential to the success of accreditation activities, yet educators can feel overwhelmed with these activities as they may lack needed knowledge, skills, and abilities to complete accreditation tasks. Faculty may also have misunderstandings about accreditation. These accreditation myths can hinder program data collection and decision-making thus leading to unfavorable accreditation reviews that may negatively impact program stakeholders. This article examines and dispels myths associated with programmatic accreditation. By dispelling myths, faculty can enhance accurate understanding of accreditation processes, promote successful reviews, and advance nursing education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 1","pages":"Pages 20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Programmatic accreditation validates the quality of nursing education, ensuring programs meet rigorous standards and prepare competent graduates ready to effectively contribute to the healthcare workforce. Faculty are essential to the success of accreditation activities, yet educators can feel overwhelmed with these activities as they may lack needed knowledge, skills, and abilities to complete accreditation tasks. Faculty may also have misunderstandings about accreditation. These accreditation myths can hinder program data collection and decision-making thus leading to unfavorable accreditation reviews that may negatively impact program stakeholders. This article examines and dispels myths associated with programmatic accreditation. By dispelling myths, faculty can enhance accurate understanding of accreditation processes, promote successful reviews, and advance nursing education.
期刊介绍:
Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty