Ictal SPECT success rate using a single SPECT session protocol

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108766
Zheng-Yang Lee , Kheng-Seang Lim , Si-Lei Fong , Kartini Rahmat , Khine Yee Mon , Chong-Tin Tan
{"title":"Ictal SPECT success rate using a single SPECT session protocol","authors":"Zheng-Yang Lee ,&nbsp;Kheng-Seang Lim ,&nbsp;Si-Lei Fong ,&nbsp;Kartini Rahmat ,&nbsp;Khine Yee Mon ,&nbsp;Chong-Tin Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provides additional information on the localisation of the epileptogenic zone. However, ictal SPECT is labour-intensive and expensive. We have developed a more affordable protocol with a single SPECT radiotracer session during a 48-hour video-EEG monitoring (VEM). This study aimed to determine the success rate of ictal SPECT with a single SPECT session (HMPAO or ECD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study included all VEM cases performed in the University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from 1st January 2011 to 30th April 2024, with SPECT as part of the pre-surgical evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 189 cases were included. The mean age was 33.3 years old (range 9–68), and 105 (55.6 %) were male. The mean baseline seizure frequency before VEM was 21.8 per month. The mean number of seizures recorded during a 48-hour VEM was 10.9. A total of 44 (23.3 %) patients had ictal SPECT with a single SPECT session. Ictal SPECT was significantly associated with a higher number of seizures during 48-hour VEM (31.5 ± 58.7 vs 4.4 ± 6.3, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and younger age (29.9 ± 11.8 vs 34.2 ± 11.9, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). On multivariate analysis, only the number of seizures during 48-hour VEM was a significant predictor for ictal SPECT (95 % CI, 1.03–1.12; odds ratio, 1.073; <em>p</em> = 0.002). Those with at least three seizures during VEM had a ≥ 30 % chance of having ictal SPECT and ≥ 40 % in those with six or more seizures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A single SPECT session on day 3 of VEM can be a cost-effective option, particularly in those patients with multiple seizures in the first 48 hours of monitoring following a fast medication taper.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 108766"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725000496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provides additional information on the localisation of the epileptogenic zone. However, ictal SPECT is labour-intensive and expensive. We have developed a more affordable protocol with a single SPECT radiotracer session during a 48-hour video-EEG monitoring (VEM). This study aimed to determine the success rate of ictal SPECT with a single SPECT session (HMPAO or ECD).

Methods

This retrospective observational study included all VEM cases performed in the University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from 1st January 2011 to 30th April 2024, with SPECT as part of the pre-surgical evaluation.

Results

A total of 189 cases were included. The mean age was 33.3 years old (range 9–68), and 105 (55.6 %) were male. The mean baseline seizure frequency before VEM was 21.8 per month. The mean number of seizures recorded during a 48-hour VEM was 10.9. A total of 44 (23.3 %) patients had ictal SPECT with a single SPECT session. Ictal SPECT was significantly associated with a higher number of seizures during 48-hour VEM (31.5 ± 58.7 vs 4.4 ± 6.3, p < 0.001) and younger age (29.9 ± 11.8 vs 34.2 ± 11.9, p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, only the number of seizures during 48-hour VEM was a significant predictor for ictal SPECT (95 % CI, 1.03–1.12; odds ratio, 1.073; p = 0.002). Those with at least three seizures during VEM had a ≥ 30 % chance of having ictal SPECT and ≥ 40 % in those with six or more seizures.

Conclusion

A single SPECT session on day 3 of VEM can be a cost-effective option, particularly in those patients with multiple seizures in the first 48 hours of monitoring following a fast medication taper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用单次 SPECT 会话方案的直肠 SPECT 成功率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Neurological deficit due to vasospasm after brain tumour resection: A single centre retrospective cohort Impact of intradural abnormalities on symptoms and clinical outcomes in Chiari malformation Autoantibody profile (MOG-IgG-positivity, AQP4-IgG-positivity, and double-seronegativity) as an outcome predictor after optic neuritis Intraoperative aneurysm flow analysis predicts intracranial large and giant aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion Clinical outcomes of percutaneous treatments for trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis: A reassessment of insights and concerns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1