Optimizing data collection requirements for machine learning models in wild blueberry automation through the application of DALL-E 2

IF 6.3 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Smart agricultural technology Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100764
Connor C. Mullins, Travis J. Esau, Qamar U. Zaman, Patrick J. Hennessy
{"title":"Optimizing data collection requirements for machine learning models in wild blueberry automation through the application of DALL-E 2","authors":"Connor C. Mullins,&nbsp;Travis J. Esau,&nbsp;Qamar U. Zaman,&nbsp;Patrick J. Hennessy","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research developed a workflow to assess the viability of AI-generated imagery in training machine learning models for detecting ripe wild blueberries (<em>Vaccinium angustifolium</em> Ait.), hair fescue weeds (<em>Festuca filiformis</em> Pourr.), and red leaf disease (<em>Exobasidium vaccinii</em>). Ground truth images were collected and augmented with AI-generated variations using DALL-E 2 to expand the dataset. Models were trained on three datasets: ground truth, generated, and a combination (40% generated images). Evaluation metrics included precision, recall, mAP<sub>50</sub>, and mAP<sub>50–95</sub>, analyzed using ANOVA multiple mean comparisons and Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05). For ripe wild blueberries, combination models achieved the highest performance across all metrics (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.834), significantly outperforming the ground truth model (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.806) in terms of mAP<sub>50–95</sub> (0.478 compared to 0.424). For hair fescue weeds, the combination dataset outperformed others with the highest mAP<sub>50</sub> (0.983), closely followed by the ground truth dataset (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.969). In detecting red leaf disease, the combination dataset showed the best performance (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.848 ± 0.140, mAP<sub>50–95</sub>: 0.607 ± 0.219), compared to the ground truth (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.615 ± 0.092, mAP<sub>50–95</sub>: 0.417 ± 0.045) and generated datasets (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.245 ± 0.088, mAP<sub>50–95</sub>: 0.144 ± 0.059). Models trained solely on generated images showed significantly lower performance across all categories except the precision metric for red leaf, where performance was comparable to ground truth. This indicated that while AI-generated images can augment datasets and improve generalization, they cannot fully replace ground truth data while maintaining model performance. Integrating AI-generated images with real-world data significantly improved model performance, reduced labor-intensive data collection processes, and provided a more diverse and comprehensive dataset for training, underscoring the importance of a balanced approach to optimizing data collection protocols for wild blueberry cultivation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100764"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277237552400368X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research developed a workflow to assess the viability of AI-generated imagery in training machine learning models for detecting ripe wild blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.), hair fescue weeds (Festuca filiformis Pourr.), and red leaf disease (Exobasidium vaccinii). Ground truth images were collected and augmented with AI-generated variations using DALL-E 2 to expand the dataset. Models were trained on three datasets: ground truth, generated, and a combination (40% generated images). Evaluation metrics included precision, recall, mAP50, and mAP50–95, analyzed using ANOVA multiple mean comparisons and Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05). For ripe wild blueberries, combination models achieved the highest performance across all metrics (mAP50: 0.834), significantly outperforming the ground truth model (mAP50: 0.806) in terms of mAP50–95 (0.478 compared to 0.424). For hair fescue weeds, the combination dataset outperformed others with the highest mAP50 (0.983), closely followed by the ground truth dataset (mAP50: 0.969). In detecting red leaf disease, the combination dataset showed the best performance (mAP50: 0.848 ± 0.140, mAP50–95: 0.607 ± 0.219), compared to the ground truth (mAP50: 0.615 ± 0.092, mAP50–95: 0.417 ± 0.045) and generated datasets (mAP50: 0.245 ± 0.088, mAP50–95: 0.144 ± 0.059). Models trained solely on generated images showed significantly lower performance across all categories except the precision metric for red leaf, where performance was comparable to ground truth. This indicated that while AI-generated images can augment datasets and improve generalization, they cannot fully replace ground truth data while maintaining model performance. Integrating AI-generated images with real-world data significantly improved model performance, reduced labor-intensive data collection processes, and provided a more diverse and comprehensive dataset for training, underscoring the importance of a balanced approach to optimizing data collection protocols for wild blueberry cultivation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
YSD-BPTrack: A multi-object tracking framework for calves in occluded environments Validation of the FERTI-drip model for the evaluation and simulation of fertigation events in drip irrigation Spectral bands vs. vegetation indices: An AutoML approach for processing tomato yield predictions based on Sentinel-2 imagery Factors influencing learning attitude of farmers regarding adoption of farming technologies in farms of Kentucky, USA Precision agriculture for iceberg lettuce: From spatial sensing to per plant decision making and control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1