The response of soil microbial necromass carbon to global change: A global meta-analysis

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Catena Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2024.108693
Wenao Wu , Jiguang Feng , Xudong Wang , Jiatian Xiao , Wenkuan Qin , Biao Zhu
{"title":"The response of soil microbial necromass carbon to global change: A global meta-analysis","authors":"Wenao Wu ,&nbsp;Jiguang Feng ,&nbsp;Xudong Wang ,&nbsp;Jiatian Xiao ,&nbsp;Wenkuan Qin ,&nbsp;Biao Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil organic carbon (SOC) is the largest carbon pool of terrestrial ecosystems and it is vulnerable to global change. As an important component of SOC, soil microbial necromass carbon (MNC) largely determines the dynamics of SOC. However, the response of MNC to global change on a global scale is not well understood. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the global response of MNC to warming, altered precipitation, nutrient addition, and elevated CO<sub>2</sub>. Our results indicated that MNC was resistant to most global change factors. However, decreased precipitation reduced MNC by 6.79 % and fungal necromass carbon (FNC) by 8.99 %. In contrast, N addition had a favorable effect on MNC (+8.60 %), FNC (+7.61 %), and bacterial necromass carbon (BNC, +12.12 %). Additionally, initial environmental and experimental conditions affected the response of MNC to N addition. Notably, we found that MNC was more responsive in topsoil than in subsoil, which could account for the depth-dependent response of SOC. Furthermore, we found that the response of soil total nitrogen content and that of microbial biomass carbon mediated the MNC response to N addition. Overall, this study enhances our understanding of how MNC responds to global change on a global scale. In future studies, the response of MNC to global change in tropical/boreal regions, in long-term experiments, and in subsoils needs more attention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 108693"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816224008907","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is the largest carbon pool of terrestrial ecosystems and it is vulnerable to global change. As an important component of SOC, soil microbial necromass carbon (MNC) largely determines the dynamics of SOC. However, the response of MNC to global change on a global scale is not well understood. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the global response of MNC to warming, altered precipitation, nutrient addition, and elevated CO2. Our results indicated that MNC was resistant to most global change factors. However, decreased precipitation reduced MNC by 6.79 % and fungal necromass carbon (FNC) by 8.99 %. In contrast, N addition had a favorable effect on MNC (+8.60 %), FNC (+7.61 %), and bacterial necromass carbon (BNC, +12.12 %). Additionally, initial environmental and experimental conditions affected the response of MNC to N addition. Notably, we found that MNC was more responsive in topsoil than in subsoil, which could account for the depth-dependent response of SOC. Furthermore, we found that the response of soil total nitrogen content and that of microbial biomass carbon mediated the MNC response to N addition. Overall, this study enhances our understanding of how MNC responds to global change on a global scale. In future studies, the response of MNC to global change in tropical/boreal regions, in long-term experiments, and in subsoils needs more attention.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤微生物坏死体碳对全球变化的响应:一项全球荟萃分析
土壤有机碳(SOC)是陆地生态系统中最大的碳库,极易受到全球变化的影响。土壤微生物坏死体碳(MNC)是土壤有机碳的重要组成部分,在很大程度上决定了土壤有机碳的动态。然而,跨国公司在全球范围内对全球变化的反应并没有得到很好的理解。在这里,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估跨国公司对变暖、降水改变、营养添加和二氧化碳升高的全球响应。我们的研究结果表明,跨国公司对大多数全球变化因素具有抵抗力。然而,降水减少使MNC降低6.79%,真菌坏死团碳(FNC)降低8.99%。相反,N对MNC(+ 8.60%)、FNC(+ 7.61%)和细菌坏死团碳(BNC, + 12.12%)有较好的影响。此外,初始环境条件和实验条件也影响氮素对MNC的响应。值得注意的是,我们发现表层土壤的MNC比底土更敏感,这可以解释土壤有机碳的深度依赖性响应。此外,我们发现土壤全氮含量和微生物生物量碳的响应介导了MNC对N添加的响应。总的来说,这项研究增强了我们对跨国公司如何在全球范围内应对全球变化的理解。在未来的研究中,热带/北方地区、长期试验和地下土壤的MNC对全球变化的响应需要更多的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
期刊最新文献
Humid badlands weathering patterns governed by gypsum and smectite presence Delayed response of river sediment to drainage reorganization in the arid and semi-arid regions Decoding channel widening dynamics: Linking hydraulic forcing and soil resistance through time-continuous prediction Temporal changes in variables affecting sediment connectivity: a case study from the loess plateau, China Spatiotemporal dynamics and driving mechanisms of carbon storage across rocky desertification grades in the karst region of Chongqing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1