Examining postoperative care: Predictors of perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management after orthopedic surgeries

Heba Khalil , Abedalmajeed Shajrawi , Ahmed Mohammad Al-Smadi , Wegdan Bani-Issa , Fatma Refaat Ahmed , Loai AbuSharour , Nabeel AL. Yateem , Khalil Yousef
{"title":"Examining postoperative care: Predictors of perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management after orthopedic surgeries","authors":"Heba Khalil ,&nbsp;Abedalmajeed Shajrawi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohammad Al-Smadi ,&nbsp;Wegdan Bani-Issa ,&nbsp;Fatma Refaat Ahmed ,&nbsp;Loai AbuSharour ,&nbsp;Nabeel AL. Yateem ,&nbsp;Khalil Yousef","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2025.101159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study examines predictors of postoperative pain relief and patient satisfaction among orthopedic patients in Jordan, emphasizing demographic and clinical factors, patient involvement in pain management, Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) utilization, and non-pharmacological pain relief techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This observational, predictive study included 300 orthopedic surgery patients. Pain intensity was measured 24 h post-surgery, and patients completed the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R). Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, ANOVA, and regression models, identified significant predictors of perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients reported high pain levels early post-surgery, with an average peak pain intensity of 8.52/10. Combined treatments provided an average pain relief score of 81.9%, and satisfaction with pain management averaged 7.86. Higher satisfaction was associated with PCA use, non-pharmacological methods, and information on pain management options. Key predictors of pain relief included surgery type, pain management information availability, the impact of opioid side effects, and pain's impact on activities, sleep, and emotional well-being. Satisfaction was also predicted by information on pain treatment, opioid side effects, and the total impact of pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Enhanced patient education, active involvement in care, individualized non-pharmacological pain relief methods, and PCA use improve perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management. This study emphasizes the importance of personalized, multimodal pain management strategies to improve postoperative care and enhance recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124125000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines predictors of postoperative pain relief and patient satisfaction among orthopedic patients in Jordan, emphasizing demographic and clinical factors, patient involvement in pain management, Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) utilization, and non-pharmacological pain relief techniques.

Methods

This observational, predictive study included 300 orthopedic surgery patients. Pain intensity was measured 24 h post-surgery, and patients completed the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R). Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, ANOVA, and regression models, identified significant predictors of perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management.

Results

Patients reported high pain levels early post-surgery, with an average peak pain intensity of 8.52/10. Combined treatments provided an average pain relief score of 81.9%, and satisfaction with pain management averaged 7.86. Higher satisfaction was associated with PCA use, non-pharmacological methods, and information on pain management options. Key predictors of pain relief included surgery type, pain management information availability, the impact of opioid side effects, and pain's impact on activities, sleep, and emotional well-being. Satisfaction was also predicted by information on pain treatment, opioid side effects, and the total impact of pain.

Conclusion

Enhanced patient education, active involvement in care, individualized non-pharmacological pain relief methods, and PCA use improve perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management. This study emphasizes the importance of personalized, multimodal pain management strategies to improve postoperative care and enhance recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
A less invasive catheterization protocol for managing urinary retention in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study The transition of young people to adult services within orthopaedic healthcare -Editorial for May 2025 issue Efficacy of an Iranian herbal medicine formula for postoperative constipation in trauma patients with hip and lower limb fractures: A triple-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial LITERATURE REVIEWS – Skin traction in orthopaedic care: Efficacy, management and clinical practices across the life course Discharge transition experience and nursing needs of elderly patients with hip fracture: A qualitative systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1