Individual differences in fluid intelligence moderate the interleaving effect for perceptual category learning

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102603
Steven C. Pan , Liwen Yu , Yilin Hong , Marcus J. Wong , Ganeash Selvarajan , Michelle E. Kaku
{"title":"Individual differences in fluid intelligence moderate the interleaving effect for perceptual category learning","authors":"Steven C. Pan ,&nbsp;Liwen Yu ,&nbsp;Yilin Hong ,&nbsp;Marcus J. Wong ,&nbsp;Ganeash Selvarajan ,&nbsp;Michelle E. Kaku","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The <em>interleaving effect</em> refers to the finding that repeatedly switching between categories during study or practice enhances learning relative to focusing on only one category at a time. Two studies investigated whether this effect is moderated by individual differences in fluid intelligence (gF), episodic memory (EM) ability, and/or working memory capacity (WMC). In Study 1 (undergraduate students) and Study 2 (adult online participants), higher gF scores were associated with larger interleaving effects for perceptual categories (artists' painting styles). Additionally, higher EM ability was associated with larger interleaving effects for perceptual categories in Study 1, whereas an analogous pattern was observed for WMC in Study 2. There were no indications that the investigated cognitive abilities moderated the interleaving effect for text-based categories (psychological disorders). Overall, these findings suggest that higher-ability learners benefit especially from interleaving in the case of perceptual category learning, with attendant theoretical and pedagogical implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102603"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001961","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interleaving effect refers to the finding that repeatedly switching between categories during study or practice enhances learning relative to focusing on only one category at a time. Two studies investigated whether this effect is moderated by individual differences in fluid intelligence (gF), episodic memory (EM) ability, and/or working memory capacity (WMC). In Study 1 (undergraduate students) and Study 2 (adult online participants), higher gF scores were associated with larger interleaving effects for perceptual categories (artists' painting styles). Additionally, higher EM ability was associated with larger interleaving effects for perceptual categories in Study 1, whereas an analogous pattern was observed for WMC in Study 2. There were no indications that the investigated cognitive abilities moderated the interleaving effect for text-based categories (psychological disorders). Overall, these findings suggest that higher-ability learners benefit especially from interleaving in the case of perceptual category learning, with attendant theoretical and pedagogical implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流体智力的个体差异调节了知觉类别学习的交错效应
交错效应指的是在学习或练习过程中反复切换类别,相对于一次只专注于一个类别,可以提高学习效果。两项研究调查了这种影响是否受到流体智力(gF)、情景记忆(EM)能力和/或工作记忆容量(WMC)的个体差异的调节。在研究1(本科生)和研究2(成人在线参与者)中,gF得分越高,感知类别(艺术家的绘画风格)的交错效应越大。此外,在研究1中,较高的EM能力与更大的感知类别交叉效应相关,而在研究2中,WMC也观察到类似的模式。没有迹象表明所调查的认知能力缓和了基于文本的类别(心理障碍)的交错效应。总的来说,这些发现表明,在感知类别学习的情况下,高能力学习者尤其受益于交错学习,这具有理论和教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
Rock-Paper-Screen: Fifth-graders' comprehension of simple and enhanced digital text Profiling bilinguals: The concurrent and longitudinal associations between executive function and reading proficiency From concrete to abstract: How stimulus concreteness impacts numerical conflict resolution in children Profiles of adolescents' self-regulated learning: Links to achievement and sociodemographic factors The role of teacher characteristics for instructional quality: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1