Correlating postoperative muscle and long-term functional outcomes with intraoperative muscle motor evoked potential changes in patients with benign intramedullary spinal cord tumors

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta Neurochirurgica Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s00701-025-06427-5
Ananth P. Abraham, A. Benjamin Francklin, K. Jayadeepan, Vedantam Rajshekhar
{"title":"Correlating postoperative muscle and long-term functional outcomes with intraoperative muscle motor evoked potential changes in patients with benign intramedullary spinal cord tumors","authors":"Ananth P. Abraham,&nbsp;A. Benjamin Francklin,&nbsp;K. Jayadeepan,&nbsp;Vedantam Rajshekhar","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06427-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) in predicting postoperative motor deficits in individual muscles of patients with benign intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs), and to correlate them with long-term functional outcome.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study of patients operated for benign IMSCTs from 2009 to 2021 was performed. Sixty-nine patients in whom baseline mMEP recordings were obtained from at least one muscle were included for analysis. A persistent drop of the baseline mMEP by ≥ 50% from baseline was considered significant.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the patients was 33.2 ± 15.8 years and 47 (68.1%) of them were male. The most common tumor was ependymoma (56.5%). Baseline mMEPs were obtained in 400/1011 muscles that were monitored. Postoperative worsening of motor power was noted in 109/400 (27.3%) muscles with baseline mMEP recordings compared to 213/611 (34.9%) muscles with no baseline recordings (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Patients who had deterioration of mMEPs had a significantly higher rate of worsening of muscle power postoperatively compared to those who had no deterioration of mMEPs (100% vs. 30.2%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The sensitivity of mMEPs in predicting postoperative motor function in monitored muscles was 53.1% (95% CI 43.5–62.6), specificity was 97.9% (95% CI 95.5–99.2), PPV was 90.9% (95% CI 81.6–95.7) and NPV was 84.1% (95% CI 81.3–86.6). At median follow-up of 18.5 (IQR 13–40) months, there was no significant difference in Nurick grade between patients who had intraoperative deterioration of mMEPs and those who did not.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intraoperative mMEP reduction had high specificity and low sensitivity for predicting immediate postoperative neurological deficits following IMSCT resection. However, the majority of patients who had worsening of mMEPs, recovered to their preoperative functional status or a better status at follow-up and there was no significant difference in long-term functional outcome between patients with and without intraoperative mMEP changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06427-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06427-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) in predicting postoperative motor deficits in individual muscles of patients with benign intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs), and to correlate them with long-term functional outcome.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients operated for benign IMSCTs from 2009 to 2021 was performed. Sixty-nine patients in whom baseline mMEP recordings were obtained from at least one muscle were included for analysis. A persistent drop of the baseline mMEP by ≥ 50% from baseline was considered significant.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 33.2 ± 15.8 years and 47 (68.1%) of them were male. The most common tumor was ependymoma (56.5%). Baseline mMEPs were obtained in 400/1011 muscles that were monitored. Postoperative worsening of motor power was noted in 109/400 (27.3%) muscles with baseline mMEP recordings compared to 213/611 (34.9%) muscles with no baseline recordings (p = 0.01). Patients who had deterioration of mMEPs had a significantly higher rate of worsening of muscle power postoperatively compared to those who had no deterioration of mMEPs (100% vs. 30.2%, p < 0.001). The sensitivity of mMEPs in predicting postoperative motor function in monitored muscles was 53.1% (95% CI 43.5–62.6), specificity was 97.9% (95% CI 95.5–99.2), PPV was 90.9% (95% CI 81.6–95.7) and NPV was 84.1% (95% CI 81.3–86.6). At median follow-up of 18.5 (IQR 13–40) months, there was no significant difference in Nurick grade between patients who had intraoperative deterioration of mMEPs and those who did not.

Conclusions

Intraoperative mMEP reduction had high specificity and low sensitivity for predicting immediate postoperative neurological deficits following IMSCT resection. However, the majority of patients who had worsening of mMEPs, recovered to their preoperative functional status or a better status at follow-up and there was no significant difference in long-term functional outcome between patients with and without intraoperative mMEP changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
良性脊髓髓内肿瘤患者术后肌肉和长期功能结局与术中肌肉运动诱发电位变化的相关性
背景:我们旨在确定术中肌肉运动诱发电位(mMEPs)在预测良性髓内脊髓肿瘤(IMSCTs)患者术后单个肌肉运动缺陷中的诊断准确性,并将其与长期功能预后联系起来。方法回顾性分析2009年至2021年行良性imsct手术的患者。69例患者的基线mMEP记录来自至少一块肌肉,纳入分析。基线mMEP从基线被认为是显著的持续下降≥50%。结果患者平均年龄33.2±15.8岁,男性47例(68.1%)。最常见的肿瘤是室管膜瘤(56.5%)。在监测的400/1011块肌肉中获得基线mmep。有基线mMEP记录的109/400块肌肉(27.3%)术后运动功率恶化,而没有基线mMEP记录的213/611块肌肉(34.9%)术后运动功率恶化(p = 0.01)。mMEPs恶化的患者术后肌力恶化率明显高于无mMEPs恶化的患者(100% vs. 30.2%, p < 0.001)。mMEPs预测术后监测肌肉运动功能的敏感性为53.1% (95% CI 43.5-62.6),特异性为97.9% (95% CI 95.5-99.2), PPV为90.9% (95% CI 81.6-95.7), NPV为84.1% (95% CI 81.3-86.6)。在中位随访18.5 (IQR 13-40)个月时,术中mMEPs恶化的患者与未发生mMEPs恶化的患者的Nurick分级无显著差异。结论术中mMEP复位预测IMSCT术后即刻神经功能缺损具有高特异性和低敏感性。然而,大多数mMEP恶化的患者在随访时恢复到术前功能状态或较好状态,术中mMEP改变和未改变患者的长期功能结局无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
期刊最新文献
The association of food deserts with readmission and re-operation following long-segment lumbar fusion. The Ki-67 proliferation index and recurrence risk of intracranial meningioma: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 5,050 patients. Hybrid surgical–endovascular revascularization for long‑segment common carotid artery occlusion close to the aortic arch: a case report Fixed-wing air transport of patients with spinal pathologies: a scoping review of current evidence and future research priorities Modified iliac screw technique for pelvic fixation: a scoping review of technical characteristics and early clinical outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1