Effects of the disconnection technique and preemptive one-lung ventilation on lung collapse during one-lung ventilation in thoracoscopic surgery.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1186/s12871-025-02899-1
Hongru Zhang, Silin Xiang, Longyong Mei, Yonggeng Feng, Han She, Yi Hu, Li Wang
{"title":"Effects of the disconnection technique and preemptive one-lung ventilation on lung collapse during one-lung ventilation in thoracoscopic surgery.","authors":"Hongru Zhang, Silin Xiang, Longyong Mei, Yonggeng Feng, Han She, Yi Hu, Li Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02899-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation (OLV), achieving lung collapse is critical for providing surgeons with a good visibility of the surgical field and to minimise tissue compression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of both the disconnection technique and preemptive one-lung ventilation in facilitating lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery using a double-lumen tube (DLT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-seven eligible patients were included and randomly divided into three groups.</p><p><strong>Control group: </strong>OLV was initiated when the surgeon started the skin incision and exposed the operative side. Disconnection group: OLV was started two minutes after the DLT was disconnected, this procedure started when the surgeon performed the skin incision. Preemptive group: OLV was initiated promptly after the patient was turned to the lateral position, and the bronchial tube port was clamped on the operative side at the lateral position for no less than 6 min until the pleura was opened. The primary outcome was the time to achieve satisfactory lung collapse, defined as the time required to reach a lung collapse score of eight points. The secondary outcomes included the lung collapse scores at different time points, Pleural opening times, OLV times, blood gas analysis results and the incidence of hypoxemia and pulmonary complications. The hypothesis formulated before data collection was that both the disconnection technique and preemptive OLV decrease the time to satisfactory lung collapse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the control group, both the disconnection and the preemptive group had a shorter time to satisfactory lung collapse (P < 0.001), lung collapse in the preemptive group was superior to that in the disconnection group at one minute (P = 0.045), no significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the disconnection technique and preemptive OLV decrease the time to satisfactory lung collapse. However, preemptive OLV results in superior early lung collapse and is therefore may more suitable for clinical application than the disconnection technique.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The protocol of this study was registered at www. chictr. org. cn (29/07/2022, ChiCTR2200062199).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02899-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation (OLV), achieving lung collapse is critical for providing surgeons with a good visibility of the surgical field and to minimise tissue compression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of both the disconnection technique and preemptive one-lung ventilation in facilitating lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery using a double-lumen tube (DLT).

Methods: Ninety-seven eligible patients were included and randomly divided into three groups.

Control group: OLV was initiated when the surgeon started the skin incision and exposed the operative side. Disconnection group: OLV was started two minutes after the DLT was disconnected, this procedure started when the surgeon performed the skin incision. Preemptive group: OLV was initiated promptly after the patient was turned to the lateral position, and the bronchial tube port was clamped on the operative side at the lateral position for no less than 6 min until the pleura was opened. The primary outcome was the time to achieve satisfactory lung collapse, defined as the time required to reach a lung collapse score of eight points. The secondary outcomes included the lung collapse scores at different time points, Pleural opening times, OLV times, blood gas analysis results and the incidence of hypoxemia and pulmonary complications. The hypothesis formulated before data collection was that both the disconnection technique and preemptive OLV decrease the time to satisfactory lung collapse.

Results: Compared to the control group, both the disconnection and the preemptive group had a shorter time to satisfactory lung collapse (P < 0.001), lung collapse in the preemptive group was superior to that in the disconnection group at one minute (P = 0.045), no significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of other outcomes.

Conclusion: Both the disconnection technique and preemptive OLV decrease the time to satisfactory lung collapse. However, preemptive OLV results in superior early lung collapse and is therefore may more suitable for clinical application than the disconnection technique.

Trial registration: The protocol of this study was registered at www. chictr. org. cn (29/07/2022, ChiCTR2200062199).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔镜手术中单肺通气中断开技术和先发制人的单肺通气对肺塌陷的影响。
背景:在单肺通气(OLV)胸腔镜手术中,实现肺塌陷对于为外科医生提供良好的手术视野和最大限度地减少组织压迫至关重要。本研究的目的是评估断开技术和先发制人的单肺通气在使用双腔管(DLT)胸腔镜手术中促进肺塌陷的疗效。方法:纳入97例符合条件的患者,随机分为3组。对照组:在外科医生开始皮肤切口并暴露手术侧时开始OLV。断开组:在DLT断开后2分钟开始OLV,该程序在外科医生进行皮肤切口时开始。先发制人组:患者转侧卧位后立即启动OLV,在侧卧位夹持术侧支气管管口不少于6min,直至打开胸膜。主要结果是达到令人满意的肺塌陷的时间,定义为达到肺塌陷评分8分所需的时间。次要结局包括各时间点肺萎陷评分、胸腔打开次数、OLV次数、血气分析结果、低氧血症及肺部并发症发生率。数据收集前的假设是,断开技术和先发制人的OLV都缩短了达到满意肺塌陷的时间。结果:与对照组相比,断路组和先断组肺塌陷满意时间均较短(P)。结论:断路技术和先断OLV均可缩短肺塌陷满意时间。然而,先发制人的OLV导致早期肺塌陷,因此可能比断开技术更适合临床应用。试验注册:本研究方案已在www上注册。chictr。org。cn (29/07/2022, ChiCTR2200062199)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Anaesthesiologic management of patients at risk of pulmonary aspiration: a Swiss consensus statement. Effective doses of remimazolam for sedation in paediatric magnetic resonance imaging following dexmedetomidine premedication: a dose-finding study. Correction: Effect of low-dose propofol infusion with sevoflurane versus propofol-only total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting in high-risk patients: a single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Representation and reporting of patients with cancer in mortality-focused adult ICU randomized trials: a systematic review. Preoperative gastric ultrasound reveals increased aspiration risk in diabetic patients undergoing elective intracranial tumor surgery: a prospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1