Commutability study on three CRMs evaluating their suitability for calibration, trueness verification and statistical quality control of methods measuring metal concentrations in human blood

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s00216-025-05751-0
Thomas P. J. Linsinger, Guy Auclair, Liesbet Deprez
{"title":"Commutability study on three CRMs evaluating their suitability for calibration, trueness verification and statistical quality control of methods measuring metal concentrations in human blood","authors":"Thomas P. J. Linsinger,&nbsp;Guy Auclair,&nbsp;Liesbet Deprez","doi":"10.1007/s00216-025-05751-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The commutability of three certified reference materials for Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb and Tl in blood was evaluated for the combination of digestion ICP-MS with dilution ICP-MS or dilution GFAAS using the difference in bias approach. Maximum non-commutability bias (MANCB) was derived from the median of the tolerance limits set by six proficiency testing (PT) providers. The evaluation showed that this criteria are too strict and that either unfeasible high number of measurements or a larger MANCB is required to demonstrate commutability. The effect of increasing the MANCB on the maximum tolerable measurement uncertainty was found small to moderate demonstrating the commutability of the materials when used as a calibrator. Also the inclusion of the uncertainty of non-commutability into the measurement uncertainty resulted in only small increases of the measurement uncertainty, demonstrating the suitability of the materials for trueness control and method validation. The bias of the three CRMs was for most elements within the 99% confidence limits of the bias of the patient samples, demonstrating the suitability of the materials for statistical quality control.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":"417 12","pages":"2617 - 2627"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00216-025-05751-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-025-05751-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The commutability of three certified reference materials for Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb and Tl in blood was evaluated for the combination of digestion ICP-MS with dilution ICP-MS or dilution GFAAS using the difference in bias approach. Maximum non-commutability bias (MANCB) was derived from the median of the tolerance limits set by six proficiency testing (PT) providers. The evaluation showed that this criteria are too strict and that either unfeasible high number of measurements or a larger MANCB is required to demonstrate commutability. The effect of increasing the MANCB on the maximum tolerable measurement uncertainty was found small to moderate demonstrating the commutability of the materials when used as a calibrator. Also the inclusion of the uncertainty of non-commutability into the measurement uncertainty resulted in only small increases of the measurement uncertainty, demonstrating the suitability of the materials for trueness control and method validation. The bias of the three CRMs was for most elements within the 99% confidence limits of the bias of the patient samples, demonstrating the suitability of the materials for statistical quality control.

Graphical abstract

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种crm的交换性研究,评价其在人体血液中金属浓度测量方法的校准、准确性验证和统计质量控制方面的适用性。
采用偏差差法评估了血液中 Cd、Cr、Hg、Ni、Pb 和 Tl 的三种认证标准物质与消化 ICP-MS 和稀释 ICP-MS 或稀释 GFAAS 的组合的互换性。最大不可通约性偏差 (MANCB) 是根据六家能力测试 (PT) 提供商设定的容许偏差限的中位数得出的。评估结果表明,这一标准过于严格,要证明可互换性,要么需要大量的测量,要么需要更大的 MANCB。增加 MANCB 对最大可容忍测量不确定度的影响很小到中等,这表明材料在用作校准器时具有互换性。此外,将非互换性的不确定性纳入测量不确定性只会导致测量不确定性的小幅增加,这表明材料适用于真实性控制和方法验证。对于大多数元素来说,三种有证标准物质的偏差都在患者样本偏差的 99% 置信限内,这表明这些材料适合用于统计质量控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
期刊最新文献
Development and characterization of nucleosomal DNA-based reference materials for the epidermal growth factor receptor gene liquid biopsy. Volumetric absorptive microsampling for profiling of signaling lipids: a comparative analysis with whole blood and dried blood spots. The hidden fluorine: a critical review of analytical methods for unmasking PFAS and closing fluorine mass balance in environmental samples. Fast ratiometric colorimetric sensing of total protein content in human serum based on classic biuret method. Oxidized carbon black nanoparticles as color label in a rapid vertical flow immunoassay for C-reactive protein detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1