Dezocine versus esketamine as postoperative analgesia in women undergoing cesarean section.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH African journal of reproductive health Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i1.13
Wei Qiao, Xiaoxiao Zhang
{"title":"Dezocine versus esketamine as postoperative analgesia in women undergoing cesarean section.","authors":"Wei Qiao, Xiaoxiao Zhang","doi":"10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this was to investigate the effect of esketamine as a postoperative analgesia in women undergoing caesarean section. A total of 134 patients were divided into two groups: 112 received esketamine and 22 received dezocine, based on their voluntary choice of analgesic drugs for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). The postoperative analgesic effects were compared between the two groups. The results showed that the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 12 and 24 hours post-operation were significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the dezocine group (P<0.05). Additionally, the time to first anal exhaust was earlier in the esketamine group (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences in the time to first ambulation or urination between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the groups (P>0.05). The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) scores at 1 and 3 days after surgery were significantly higher than the preoperative scores in both groups (P<0.05); however, the EPDS scores were significantly lower in the esketamine group compared to the Dezocine group (P<0.05). We conclude that esketamine provides effective postoperative pain relief in women undergoing caesarean section patients without increasing adverse reactions, while it promotes recovery and reduces postpartum depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":7551,"journal":{"name":"African journal of reproductive health","volume":"29 1","pages":"127-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i1.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this was to investigate the effect of esketamine as a postoperative analgesia in women undergoing caesarean section. A total of 134 patients were divided into two groups: 112 received esketamine and 22 received dezocine, based on their voluntary choice of analgesic drugs for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). The postoperative analgesic effects were compared between the two groups. The results showed that the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 12 and 24 hours post-operation were significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the dezocine group (P<0.05). Additionally, the time to first anal exhaust was earlier in the esketamine group (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences in the time to first ambulation or urination between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the groups (P>0.05). The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) scores at 1 and 3 days after surgery were significantly higher than the preoperative scores in both groups (P<0.05); however, the EPDS scores were significantly lower in the esketamine group compared to the Dezocine group (P<0.05). We conclude that esketamine provides effective postoperative pain relief in women undergoing caesarean section patients without increasing adverse reactions, while it promotes recovery and reduces postpartum depression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地佐辛与艾氯胺酮在剖宫产术后镇痛中的应用。
目的是研究艾氯胺酮作为剖宫产妇女术后镇痛的效果。根据患者自主选择静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)药物的情况,将134例患者分为两组:112例使用艾氯胺酮,22例使用地佐辛。比较两组术后镇痛效果。结果显示,艾氯胺酮组术后12、24 h视觉模拟评分明显低于地佐辛组(P0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者术后1、3 d爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评分均显著高于术前(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African journal of reproductive health
African journal of reproductive health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Reproductive Health is a multidisciplinary and international journal that publishes original research, comprehensive review articles, short reports, and commentaries on reproductive heath in Africa. The journal strives to provide a forum for African authors, as well as others working in Africa, to share findings on all aspects of reproductive health, and to disseminate innovative, relevant and useful information on reproductive health throughout the continent.
期刊最新文献
A family planning investment case for Chad: Evidence, costs, and pathways to sustainable financing. Expanding family planning services in Sierra Leone: A transformative, smart investment. Financing reproductive health in Ebonyi State, Nigeria: An investment case for equity and economic growth. From evidence to action: Investment cases for strengthening sexual and reproductive health and rights financing in West and Central Africa. Informing reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health and nutrition priority-setting and financing in Guinea: Findings from a national investment case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1