Milene Vitória Sampaio Sobral, Livia Kneipp Rodrigues, Abner Mácola Pacheco Barbosa, Naila Camila da Rocha, Isac Ribeiro Moulaz, João Pedro Pereira Dos Santos, Bruno Henrique Couto Oliveira, João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira, Francis Lopes Pacagnelli, Camila Mota Guida
{"title":"Cardiovascular Effects of Semaglutide in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Milene Vitória Sampaio Sobral, Livia Kneipp Rodrigues, Abner Mácola Pacheco Barbosa, Naila Camila da Rocha, Isac Ribeiro Moulaz, João Pedro Pereira Dos Santos, Bruno Henrique Couto Oliveira, João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira, Francis Lopes Pacagnelli, Camila Mota Guida","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00721-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Semaglutide has emerged as an effective medication for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the cardiovascular effects and safety of this agent in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical and laboratory effects of semaglutide compared to placebo in patients with HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized cohorts, from inception to July 2024, comparing semaglutide versus placebo in patients with HFpEF. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 4.3.2. Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled across trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included three studies, two RCTs and one non-randomized cohort, reporting data on 1463 patients. The follow-up time of the studies was 52 weeks. Compared to placebo, the use of semaglutide was associated with a significant increase in the 6-min walk distance (MD 16.20; 95% CI 10.19-22.21; p < 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Additionally, reductions were observed in systolic blood pressure (MD -2.22; 95% CI -3.60 to -0.83; p < 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), C-reactive protein level (MD 0.59; 95% CI 0.49-0.70; p < 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 51%), and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (MD 0.81; 95% CI 0.74-0.89; p < 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the use of semaglutide is associated with clinical and laboratory benefits in patients with HFpEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-025-00721-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Semaglutide has emerged as an effective medication for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the cardiovascular effects and safety of this agent in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are unclear.
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical and laboratory effects of semaglutide compared to placebo in patients with HFpEF.
Methods: We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized cohorts, from inception to July 2024, comparing semaglutide versus placebo in patients with HFpEF. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 4.3.2. Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled across trials.
Results: This meta-analysis included three studies, two RCTs and one non-randomized cohort, reporting data on 1463 patients. The follow-up time of the studies was 52 weeks. Compared to placebo, the use of semaglutide was associated with a significant increase in the 6-min walk distance (MD 16.20; 95% CI 10.19-22.21; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%). Additionally, reductions were observed in systolic blood pressure (MD -2.22; 95% CI -3.60 to -0.83; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), C-reactive protein level (MD 0.59; 95% CI 0.49-0.70; p < 0.01; I2 = 51%), and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (MD 0.81; 95% CI 0.74-0.89; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the use of semaglutide is associated with clinical and laboratory benefits in patients with HFpEF.
期刊介绍：
Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents.
Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations.
The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
