Reference values for the 1-minute sit-to-stand test to assess functional capacity and short-term mortality in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and fibrotic connective tissue related interstitial lung diseases: a prospective real-world cohort study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMC Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1186/s12890-025-03521-3
Meng-Yun Tsai, Kuo-Tung Huang, Chiann-Yi Hsu, Yi-Hsuan Yu, Pin-Kuei Fu
{"title":"Reference values for the 1-minute sit-to-stand test to assess functional capacity and short-term mortality in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and fibrotic connective tissue related interstitial lung diseases: a prospective real-world cohort study.","authors":"Meng-Yun Tsai, Kuo-Tung Huang, Chiann-Yi Hsu, Yi-Hsuan Yu, Pin-Kuei Fu","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03521-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification of functional decline in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) is crucial for timely treatment and improved survival. While the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is the standard for functional evaluation, it has practical limitations. The 1-minute sit-to-stand test (1MSTS) offers a simpler alternative; however, its correlation with the 6MWT in F-ILD patients remains unclear. This study aims to establish reference values for the 1MSTS in assessing functional capacity, evaluate its correlation with the 6MWT, and explore its utility in predicting 18-month mortality in F-ILD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled participants diagnosed with F-ILD based on multidisciplinary team discussions. Assessments included the 1MSTS, 6MWT, pulmonary function test (PFT), GAP score, mMRC scale, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The association between 1MSTS repetitions and other variables was calculated using Spearman's rho. Bland-Altman plots assessed the agreement between 1MSTS repetitions and the 6MWT. Predictors of 18-month mortality were evaluated using ROC curve and Kaplan-Meier curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 150 F-ILD patients, 37 (24.6%) had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and 113 (75.4%) had connective tissue disease-related ILD (CTD-ILD). Using ≤ 23 repetitions as the cutoff for functional impairment in 1MSTS, 74 (47.3%) patients were classified as impaired. The 1MSTS significantly predicted 18-month mortality and demonstrated moderate correlations with GAP score (rs = -0.49), mMRC scale (rs = -0.47), and 6MWT distance (rs = 0.65). Bland-Altman analysis indicated agreement between 1MSTS repetitions and 6MWT distance. Using ≤ 23 repetitions as the cutoff value for the 1MSTS to predict 18-month mortality, the mortality rate was 76.4%, with an AUC of 0.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that ≤ 23 repetitions in the 1MSTS can serve as an indicator of functional impairment, demonstrate a good correlation with 6MWT distance, and effectively predict 18-month mortality in patients with F-ILD.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11796153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03521-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early identification of functional decline in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) is crucial for timely treatment and improved survival. While the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is the standard for functional evaluation, it has practical limitations. The 1-minute sit-to-stand test (1MSTS) offers a simpler alternative; however, its correlation with the 6MWT in F-ILD patients remains unclear. This study aims to establish reference values for the 1MSTS in assessing functional capacity, evaluate its correlation with the 6MWT, and explore its utility in predicting 18-month mortality in F-ILD patients.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled participants diagnosed with F-ILD based on multidisciplinary team discussions. Assessments included the 1MSTS, 6MWT, pulmonary function test (PFT), GAP score, mMRC scale, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The association between 1MSTS repetitions and other variables was calculated using Spearman's rho. Bland-Altman plots assessed the agreement between 1MSTS repetitions and the 6MWT. Predictors of 18-month mortality were evaluated using ROC curve and Kaplan-Meier curve.

Results: Of the 150 F-ILD patients, 37 (24.6%) had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and 113 (75.4%) had connective tissue disease-related ILD (CTD-ILD). Using ≤ 23 repetitions as the cutoff for functional impairment in 1MSTS, 74 (47.3%) patients were classified as impaired. The 1MSTS significantly predicted 18-month mortality and demonstrated moderate correlations with GAP score (rs = -0.49), mMRC scale (rs = -0.47), and 6MWT distance (rs = 0.65). Bland-Altman analysis indicated agreement between 1MSTS repetitions and 6MWT distance. Using ≤ 23 repetitions as the cutoff value for the 1MSTS to predict 18-month mortality, the mortality rate was 76.4%, with an AUC of 0.81.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that ≤ 23 repetitions in the 1MSTS can serve as an indicator of functional impairment, demonstrate a good correlation with 6MWT distance, and effectively predict 18-month mortality in patients with F-ILD.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估特发性肺纤维化和纤维结缔组织相关间质性肺疾病患者功能能力和短期死亡率的 1 分钟坐立测试参考值:一项前瞻性真实世界队列研究。
背景:早期识别纤维化间质性肺疾病(F-ILD)的功能下降对于及时治疗和提高生存率至关重要。虽然6分钟步行测试(6MWT)是功能评估的标准,但它有实际的局限性。1分钟坐立测试(1MSTS)提供了一个更简单的选择;然而,其与F-ILD患者6MWT的相关性尚不清楚。本研究旨在建立1MSTS评估功能容量的参考值,评估其与6MWT的相关性,并探讨其在预测F-ILD患者18个月死亡率中的应用。方法:这项前瞻性研究招募了基于多学科小组讨论诊断为F-ILD的参与者。评估包括1MSTS、6MWT、肺功能测试(PFT)、GAP评分、mMRC量表和Charlson合并症指数(CCI)。1MSTS重复次数与其他变量之间的关联使用Spearman's rho计算。Bland-Altman图评估了1MSTS重复与6MWT之间的一致性。采用ROC曲线和Kaplan-Meier曲线评价18个月死亡率的预测因子。结果:在150例F-ILD患者中,37例(24.6%)为特发性肺纤维化(IPF), 113例(75.4%)为结缔组织病相关ILD (CTD-ILD)。以≤23次重复作为1例msts功能损害的临界值,74例(47.3%)患者被归为功能受损。1MSTS显著预测18个月死亡率,并与GAP评分(rs = -0.49)、mMRC量表(rs = -0.47)和6MWT距离(rs = 0.65)有中度相关性。Bland-Altman分析表明,1MSTS重复数与6MWT距离一致。以≤23次重复作为1MSTS预测18个月死亡率的临界值,死亡率为76.4%,AUC为0.81。结论:1MSTS≤23次重复可作为功能损害的指标,与6MWT距离具有良好的相关性,可有效预测F-ILD患者18个月死亡率。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of MN-166 (ibudilast) on acute respiratory failure prevention in hospitalized participants with COVID-19: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Chronic pancreatitis complicated by pancreatico-pleural fistula leading to black pleural effusion: a case report. Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on lung function and quality of life in pulmonary tuberculosis survivors with post-tuberculosis lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of inspiratory muscle training on exercise capacity, muscle oxygenation and strength, physical activity, and dyspnea in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome and pulmonary involvement: a randomized controlled triple-blinded study. Bronchoscopic removal of lower airway foreign body: a two-center retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1