Prevalence and Patterns of Opioid Use in Chronic Pancreatitis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000807
Anna Evans Phillips, Darwin L Conwell, Shuang Li, Jami L Saloman, Phil A Hart, Evan L Fogel, Santhi Swaroop Vege, Dana K Andersen, William E Fisher, Christopher E Forsmark, Stephen Pandol, Walter G Park, Mark D Topazian, Stephen K Van Den Eeden, Jose Serrano, Liang Li, Dhiraj Yadav
{"title":"Prevalence and Patterns of Opioid Use in Chronic Pancreatitis.","authors":"Anna Evans Phillips, Darwin L Conwell, Shuang Li, Jami L Saloman, Phil A Hart, Evan L Fogel, Santhi Swaroop Vege, Dana K Andersen, William E Fisher, Christopher E Forsmark, Stephen Pandol, Walter G Park, Mark D Topazian, Stephen K Van Den Eeden, Jose Serrano, Liang Li, Dhiraj Yadav","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Opioids are used to treat pain in chronic pancreatitis (CP), but little is known about current use patterns. The aim of this study was to characterize the utilization of opioids and associations with clinical characteristics in adult patients with CP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis used baseline data from participants with definite CP enrolled in a cohort study in the United States (PROspective Evaluation of CP for EpidEmiologic and Translational StuDies). Data on demographics, pain medication use, healthcare utilization, disability, and pain patterns were systematically collected in case report forms while quality of life was assessed with patient-reported outcome instruments. Opioid use was classified according to strength (weak or strong) and frequency (scheduled or as-needed).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 681 participants (n = 364, 53% male) were included: 299 (44%) were current opioid users (22% only weak opioids and 22% at least 1 strong opioid). Increasing frequency and severity of pain was associated with increase of weak, strong, as-needed, or scheduled opioids. Neuromodulators were used by ∼40% of participants; increasing use was associated with increasing frequency and severity of pain. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors associated with strength and frequency of current opioid use were pain patterns (odds ratios [ORs] 1.84-8.32 and ORs 1.92-8.52, respectively, P < 0.001) and prior celiac plexus block (OR 3.54, 95% confidence intervals 1.82-6.87 and OR 3.42, 95% confidence intervals 1.76-6.64, respectively). Participants using opioids had higher prevalence of disability, healthcare utilization, and poorer quality of life.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Opioid use in CP is common and associated with increased pain severity and constancy. These data provide foundational estimates for future trials that can elucidate the complex interactions between patient factors, pain, and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Opioids are used to treat pain in chronic pancreatitis (CP), but little is known about current use patterns. The aim of this study was to characterize the utilization of opioids and associations with clinical characteristics in adult patients with CP.

Methods: This cross-sectional analysis used baseline data from participants with definite CP enrolled in a cohort study in the United States (PROspective Evaluation of CP for EpidEmiologic and Translational StuDies). Data on demographics, pain medication use, healthcare utilization, disability, and pain patterns were systematically collected in case report forms while quality of life was assessed with patient-reported outcome instruments. Opioid use was classified according to strength (weak or strong) and frequency (scheduled or as-needed).

Results: A total of 681 participants (n = 364, 53% male) were included: 299 (44%) were current opioid users (22% only weak opioids and 22% at least 1 strong opioid). Increasing frequency and severity of pain was associated with increase of weak, strong, as-needed, or scheduled opioids. Neuromodulators were used by ∼40% of participants; increasing use was associated with increasing frequency and severity of pain. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors associated with strength and frequency of current opioid use were pain patterns (odds ratios [ORs] 1.84-8.32 and ORs 1.92-8.52, respectively, P < 0.001) and prior celiac plexus block (OR 3.54, 95% confidence intervals 1.82-6.87 and OR 3.42, 95% confidence intervals 1.76-6.64, respectively). Participants using opioids had higher prevalence of disability, healthcare utilization, and poorer quality of life.

Discussion: Opioid use in CP is common and associated with increased pain severity and constancy. These data provide foundational estimates for future trials that can elucidate the complex interactions between patient factors, pain, and interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:阿片类药物可用于治疗慢性胰腺炎(CP)患者的疼痛,但人们对目前的使用模式知之甚少。本研究旨在了解阿片类药物的使用情况,以及与慢性胰腺炎成年患者临床特征的关系:这项横断面分析利用了美国一项队列研究(PROCEED)中明确患有 CP 的参与者的基线数据。通过病例报告表系统收集了有关人口统计学、止痛药物使用、医疗保健使用、残疾和疼痛模式的数据,并通过患者报告结果工具评估了生活质量(QOL)。阿片类药物的使用根据强度(弱或强)和频率(按计划或按需要)进行分类:共纳入 681 名参与者(364 人,53% 为男性):299人(44%)目前使用阿片类药物(22%仅使用弱阿片类药物,22%至少使用一种强阿片类药物)。疼痛频率和严重程度的增加与弱阿片、强阿片、按需阿片或计划阿片的增加有关。40%的参与者使用神经调节剂;使用量的增加与疼痛频率和严重程度的增加有关。在多变量分析中,与当前阿片类药物使用强度和频率相关的独立预测因素是疼痛模式(ORs 1.84-8.32 和 ORs 1.92-8.52,pConclusions):在 CP 中使用阿片类药物很常见,并且与疼痛严重程度和持续性增加有关。这些数据为未来的试验提供了基础性的估计,可以阐明患者因素、疼痛和干预措施之间复杂的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
期刊最新文献
Mucin 5AC as a biomarker for sessile serrated lesions: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Anoreceptive Intercourse in Sexual and Gender Minorities with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis. Nomogram prediction for gastric cancer development. Secondary SBP Prophylaxis is associated with a higher rate of non-SBP infections in Two US-based National Cirrhosis Cohorts. Decreased Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Correlates with Higher Portal Hypertension And Poor Survival in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Binary-center Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1