Automated assessment of collateral circulation and infarct core: predictors of functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke following endovascular thrombectomy.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s00234-024-03519-4
Ingrid Požar, Fajko F Bajrović, Lan Umek, Katarina Šurlan Popović
{"title":"Automated assessment of collateral circulation and infarct core: predictors of functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke following endovascular thrombectomy.","authors":"Ingrid Požar, Fajko F Bajrović, Lan Umek, Katarina Šurlan Popović","doi":"10.1007/s00234-024-03519-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of automatically assessed collateral circulation (CC) and infarct core for functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 208 patients with anterior large vessel occlusion treated with EVT. Two AI-powered software were used to automatically assess CC and infarct core. Comparative analyses included patient demographics, clinical and imaging data, and functional outcome. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to predict the 90-day functional outcome. A favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score ≤ 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 208 patients, 114 (54.8%) were women and 94 were men, with a mean age of 71.4 ± 13.3 years. Patients with higher collateral score (CS) exhibited lower infarct core volumes (p < 0.001) and better mRS score at 90 days (p = 0.008). Among patients with a favorable outcome, the mean infarct core volume was lower compared to those with poor outcomes (5 mL vs. 8.6 mL, p = 0.003). In univariate logistic regression, both infarct core (OR 0.94, p = 0.005) and CS (OR 1.84, p = 0.014) were predictors of favorable outcome. However, in multivariable models, only infarct core remained a significant independent predictor [AORs of 0.95 (p = 0.021) and 0.96 (p = 0.039)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatically assessed infarct core is a robust predictor of functional outcome in AIS patients post-EVT, while CS's predictive value diminishes when adjusted for infarct core. These findings support the integration of AI-powered evaluations in clinical settings to improve prognosis and treatment strategies for AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1381-1391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03519-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of automatically assessed collateral circulation (CC) and infarct core for functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 208 patients with anterior large vessel occlusion treated with EVT. Two AI-powered software were used to automatically assess CC and infarct core. Comparative analyses included patient demographics, clinical and imaging data, and functional outcome. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to predict the 90-day functional outcome. A favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score ≤ 2.

Results: Among the 208 patients, 114 (54.8%) were women and 94 were men, with a mean age of 71.4 ± 13.3 years. Patients with higher collateral score (CS) exhibited lower infarct core volumes (p < 0.001) and better mRS score at 90 days (p = 0.008). Among patients with a favorable outcome, the mean infarct core volume was lower compared to those with poor outcomes (5 mL vs. 8.6 mL, p = 0.003). In univariate logistic regression, both infarct core (OR 0.94, p = 0.005) and CS (OR 1.84, p = 0.014) were predictors of favorable outcome. However, in multivariable models, only infarct core remained a significant independent predictor [AORs of 0.95 (p = 0.021) and 0.96 (p = 0.039)].

Conclusion: Automatically assessed infarct core is a robust predictor of functional outcome in AIS patients post-EVT, while CS's predictive value diminishes when adjusted for infarct core. These findings support the integration of AI-powered evaluations in clinical settings to improve prognosis and treatment strategies for AIS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侧支循环和梗死核心的自动评估:血管内血栓切除术后急性缺血性卒中功能结局的预测因素。
目的:本研究旨在评估自动评估侧支循环(CC)和梗死核心对急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者血管内取栓(EVT)功能结局的预测价值。方法:我们对208例采用EVT治疗的前大血管闭塞患者进行回顾性队列研究。使用两种人工智能驱动的软件自动评估CC和梗死核心。比较分析包括患者人口统计学、临床和影像学数据以及功能结果。进行单变量和多变量logistic回归分析来预测90天的功能结局。改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分≤2分为预后良好。结果:208例患者中,女性114例(54.8%),男性94例,平均年龄71.4±13.3岁。侧支评分(CS)较高的患者表现出更低的梗死核心体积(p)。结论:自动评估的梗死核心是evt后AIS患者功能结局的可靠预测指标,而CS的预测价值在调整梗死核心后会降低。这些发现支持在临床环境中整合人工智能驱动的评估,以改善AIS的预后和治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
期刊最新文献
The value of non-contrast and contrast-enhanced time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up assessment of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents. Association of concomitant subaxial cervical spine injury with imaging-based spinal cord injury and impaired consciousness in upper cervical spine trauma. New MRI findings of late delayed radiation injuries in long-term survivors after radiotherapy: punctate enhancing dot-, oval-, or rod-like lesions. Noninvasive MRI biomarkers in diabetic neuropathy: correlation with electrophysiology, clinical scores, and nerve pathology. 3D quantitative synthetic MRI for assessing Alzheimer's clinical syndrome, subjective cognitive impairment, and mild cognitive impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1