Exercise Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57859
Rou Yi Soong, Chen Ee Low, Vanessa Ong, Isaac Sim, Charmaine Lee, Fattah Lee, Lucas Chew, Chun En Yau, Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin Lee, Matthew Zhixuan Chen
{"title":"Exercise Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rou Yi Soong, Chen Ee Low, Vanessa Ong, Isaac Sim, Charmaine Lee, Fattah Lee, Lucas Chew, Chun En Yau, Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin Lee, Matthew Zhixuan Chen","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cancer and its treatment negatively impact the mental health of older adults. The potential of exercise interventions as a complementary treatment to alleviate the psychological impacts of cancer is promising, but there are gaps in the current literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if exercise interventions are associated with improvements in psychological outcomes among older adults with cancer.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases were searched from database inception to November 5, 2024. Search terms used were geriatrics, cancer, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and exercise interventions.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that analyzed the association of various exercise interventions with at least 1 of 3 psychological outcomes (depression, anxiety, or health-related quality-of-life [HRQOL]) were included. The control groups were given usual care. Studies were included if the mean age of participants was older than 60 years and had participants with a diagnosis of any cancer regardless of comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Studies were screened, and data were extracted by 2 independent authors. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used for analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was followed.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were depression, anxiety, and HRQOL. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to quantify the association of exercise interventions with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 RCTs with 1929 participants were included. Meta-analyses observed an association of exercise with a significant reduction in levels of depression (SMD = -0.53; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.28) and anxiety (SMD = -0.39; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.12) and improvements in overall HRQOL (SMD = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.10 to 1.17). Subgroup analyses revealed that mind-body exercise interventions were significantly associated with improved depression (SMD = -0.89; 95% CI, -1.51 to -0.27) and anxiety levels (SMD = -0.77; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.01) compared with conventional exercise interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 RCTs, exercise interventions were found to be associated with significantly reduced levels of depression and anxiety and significantly improved HRQOL in older adults with cancer. These findings suggest that health care professionals and policymakers should focus more on implementing exercise interventions to improve mental health outcomes in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 2","pages":"e2457859"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57859","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Cancer and its treatment negatively impact the mental health of older adults. The potential of exercise interventions as a complementary treatment to alleviate the psychological impacts of cancer is promising, but there are gaps in the current literature.

Objective: To determine if exercise interventions are associated with improvements in psychological outcomes among older adults with cancer.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases were searched from database inception to November 5, 2024. Search terms used were geriatrics, cancer, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and exercise interventions.

Study selection: English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that analyzed the association of various exercise interventions with at least 1 of 3 psychological outcomes (depression, anxiety, or health-related quality-of-life [HRQOL]) were included. The control groups were given usual care. Studies were included if the mean age of participants was older than 60 years and had participants with a diagnosis of any cancer regardless of comorbidities.

Data extraction and synthesis: Studies were screened, and data were extracted by 2 independent authors. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used for analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was followed.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were depression, anxiety, and HRQOL. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to quantify the association of exercise interventions with outcomes.

Results: A total of 27 RCTs with 1929 participants were included. Meta-analyses observed an association of exercise with a significant reduction in levels of depression (SMD = -0.53; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.28) and anxiety (SMD = -0.39; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.12) and improvements in overall HRQOL (SMD = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.10 to 1.17). Subgroup analyses revealed that mind-body exercise interventions were significantly associated with improved depression (SMD = -0.89; 95% CI, -1.51 to -0.27) and anxiety levels (SMD = -0.77; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.01) compared with conventional exercise interventions.

Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 RCTs, exercise interventions were found to be associated with significantly reduced levels of depression and anxiety and significantly improved HRQOL in older adults with cancer. These findings suggest that health care professionals and policymakers should focus more on implementing exercise interventions to improve mental health outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对老年癌症患者抑郁、焦虑和生活质量的运动干预:系统回顾与元分析》。
重要性:癌症及其治疗会对老年人的心理健康产生负面影响。运动干预作为一种辅助治疗来减轻癌症的心理影响的潜力是有希望的,但目前的文献中存在空白。目的:确定运动干预是否与老年癌症患者心理结果的改善有关。数据来源:PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO和Cochrane数据库从数据库建立到2024年11月5日。搜索词包括老年病学、癌症、抑郁、焦虑、生活质量和运动干预。研究选择:纳入英语随机临床试验(RCTs),分析各种运动干预与3种心理结果(抑郁、焦虑或健康相关生活质量[HRQOL])中的至少1种之间的关系。对照组给予常规护理。如果参与者的平均年龄大于60岁,并且参与者被诊断患有任何癌症,而不考虑合并症,则纳入研究。数据提取和综合:对研究进行筛选,并由2名独立作者提取数据。采用随机效应荟萃分析和元回归分析。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。主要结局和测量:主要结局为抑郁、焦虑和HRQOL。标准化平均差(SMD)用于量化运动干预与结果的关联。结果:共纳入27项随机对照试验,受试者1929人。荟萃分析发现,运动与抑郁水平显著降低相关(SMD = -0.53;95% CI, -0.79至-0.28)和焦虑(SMD = -0.39;95% CI, -0.66 ~ -0.12)和总体HRQOL的改善(SMD = 0.63;95% CI, 0.10 ~ 1.17)。亚组分析显示,身心运动干预与抑郁症的改善显著相关(SMD = -0.89;95% CI, -1.51至-0.27)和焦虑水平(SMD = -0.77;95% CI, -1.54 ~ -0.01)。结论:在对27项随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析中,发现运动干预与老年癌症患者抑郁和焦虑水平的显著降低以及HRQOL的显著改善相关。这些发现表明,卫生保健专业人员和政策制定者应该更多地关注实施运动干预,以改善这一弱势群体的心理健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
Match Rates Between Home Health Assessment and Medicare Claims Data. Unionization, Ownership Status, and Direct Care Worker Turnover. Wording Change in Introduction. Police Pursuit Fatalities in the US, 2009 to 2023. Police Pursuit Fatality Rates in the US and Directions for Future Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1