Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Hospitalized Adults With Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Prospective Open-Label Pilot Study.

IF 3.7 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1177/19322968251316887
Magdalena M Bogun, Chunhui Wang, Paul A Kurlansky, Nur Bedeir, Guillermo E Umpierrez
{"title":"Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Hospitalized Adults With Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Prospective Open-Label Pilot Study.","authors":"Magdalena M Bogun, Chunhui Wang, Paul A Kurlansky, Nur Bedeir, Guillermo E Umpierrez","doi":"10.1177/19322968251316887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are increasingly used in critical and non-critical care hospital units. The efficacy of CGM in assessing glucose control in adults with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center pilot study compared glycemic control by real-time CGM (Dexcom G6), capillary point-of-care (POC), and basic metabolic panel (BMP) during intravenous (IV) insulin treatment and after the resolution of DKA. We compared the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), median absolute relative difference (ARD) glucose values, and Diabetes Technology Society (DTS) Error Grid analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 52 patients (49 ± 19 years, admission glucose: 503 ± 239.4 mg/dL) with type 1 diabetes (n = 24) and type 2 diabetes (n = 28). Compared with POC testing, the MARD was 17.4% ± 13.2%, and the median ARD was 14.2% (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.4, 28) during the initial IV insulin period and 19.8% ± 18.7% and 14.3% (7, 26.2) after DKA resolution. The DTS Error Grid analysis showed that 100% of values during the IV insulin treatment and 95% after the DKA resolution were in zones A+B. Compared with BMP glucose values, the MARD and median ARD were 18.5% ± 19.1% and 12.2% (5.4, 23.8) during the IV insulin treatment and 22.5% ± 24.7% and 15.1% (6.6, 27.6) after DKA resolution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first report on the use of real-time CGM in adults with DKA. Our study indicates that CGM technology is a reliable tool for hospital use during acute insulin treatment and after the resolution of DKA. Future multicentre randomized studies are needed to determine the benefits of real-time CGM in facilitating diabetes care in hospitalized patients with hyperglycemic crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"19322968251316887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251316887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are increasingly used in critical and non-critical care hospital units. The efficacy of CGM in assessing glucose control in adults with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is unknown.

Methods: This single-center pilot study compared glycemic control by real-time CGM (Dexcom G6), capillary point-of-care (POC), and basic metabolic panel (BMP) during intravenous (IV) insulin treatment and after the resolution of DKA. We compared the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), median absolute relative difference (ARD) glucose values, and Diabetes Technology Society (DTS) Error Grid analyses.

Results: We recruited 52 patients (49 ± 19 years, admission glucose: 503 ± 239.4 mg/dL) with type 1 diabetes (n = 24) and type 2 diabetes (n = 28). Compared with POC testing, the MARD was 17.4% ± 13.2%, and the median ARD was 14.2% (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.4, 28) during the initial IV insulin period and 19.8% ± 18.7% and 14.3% (7, 26.2) after DKA resolution. The DTS Error Grid analysis showed that 100% of values during the IV insulin treatment and 95% after the DKA resolution were in zones A+B. Compared with BMP glucose values, the MARD and median ARD were 18.5% ± 19.1% and 12.2% (5.4, 23.8) during the IV insulin treatment and 22.5% ± 24.7% and 15.1% (6.6, 27.6) after DKA resolution.

Conclusion: This is the first report on the use of real-time CGM in adults with DKA. Our study indicates that CGM technology is a reliable tool for hospital use during acute insulin treatment and after the resolution of DKA. Future multicentre randomized studies are needed to determine the benefits of real-time CGM in facilitating diabetes care in hospitalized patients with hyperglycemic crises.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院成人糖尿病酮症酸中毒的持续血糖监测:一项前瞻性开放标签试点研究。
背景:连续血糖监测(CGM)设备越来越多地用于医院重症和非重症监护病房。CGM在评估糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)成人血糖控制中的作用尚不清楚。方法:这项单中心试点研究比较了静脉注射(IV)胰岛素治疗期间和DKA解决后实时CGM (Dexcom G6)、毛细血管护理点(POC)和基础代谢组(BMP)的血糖控制情况。我们比较了平均绝对相对差(MARD)、中位数绝对相对差(ARD)血糖值和糖尿病技术学会(DTS)误差网格分析。结果:我们招募了52例1型糖尿病(n = 24)和2型糖尿病(n = 28)患者(49±19岁,入院血糖:503±239.4 mg/dL)。与POC测试相比,初始静脉注射胰岛素期间的MARD为17.4%±13.2%,中位ARD为14.2%(四分位数间距[IQR]: 6.4, 28), DKA消退后为19.8%±18.7%和14.3%(7,26.2)。DTS误差网格分析显示,静脉注射胰岛素治疗期间100%的值和DKA解决后95%的值在A+B区。与BMP葡萄糖值相比,静脉注射胰岛素治疗期间的MARD和中位ARD分别为18.5%±19.1%和12.2% (5.4,23.8),DKA消退后的MARD和中位ARD分别为22.5%±24.7%和15.1%(6.6,27.6)。结论:这是首次报道实时CGM在成人DKA患者中的应用。我们的研究表明,CGM技术是医院在急性胰岛素治疗期间和DKA解决后使用的可靠工具。需要未来的多中心随机研究来确定实时CGM在促进高血糖危重住院患者糖尿病护理方面的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Clinical Outcomes and Productivity Losses Among People Living With Type 2 Diabetes Not Using Insulin From an Employer's Perspective. Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Machine Learning to Identify Metabolic Subphenotypes and Inform Precision Lifestyle Changes. Green Diabetes: Already a Decisive Factor for or Against Technology for People Living With Diabetes? First in Human Feasibility Study of an Insulin Patch Pump Combined With CGM-Insulin Delivery Cannula. Association Between Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensor Active Time and Glycemic Metrics in Patients With Diabetes: A Real-World Setting Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1