An analysis of dental board disciplinary action among general dentists in Texas.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the American Dental Association Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2024.12.009
Yen-Wen Huang, Sahar Dowlatshahi, Srinivas Ayilavarapu, Jennifer Chang, Pooja Maney, Sridhar Eswaran
{"title":"An analysis of dental board disciplinary action among general dentists in Texas.","authors":"Yen-Wen Huang, Sahar Dowlatshahi, Srinivas Ayilavarapu, Jennifer Chang, Pooja Maney, Sridhar Eswaran","doi":"10.1016/j.adaj.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental care professionals can gain valuable insights by examining infractions reported to the state board of dentistry, which can serve as a resource to enhance their professional practice. By reviewing various infractions (violations resulting in disciplinary action) reported by the state boards, dental care professionals can foster ethical awareness, uphold professional conduct, manage risks effectively, prioritize patient-centered care, engage in continuous professional development, and promote peer accountability. This study analyzes state dental board disciplinary action data in Texas to identify common infractions among practicing general dentists and to leverage this information as an educational tool for dental care professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search of disciplinary actions was conducted, using the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners database. For this study, 1,056 disciplinary action reports were reviewed, and disciplinary infractions were classified into 5 main categories based on the nature of the infractions related to diagnosis, treatment, renewals, recordkeeping, and ethics and professionalism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After reviewing 1,056 disciplinary actions, the results showed that most infractions were due to inadequate recordkeeping (39%). The rest of the infractions included inadequate treatment (23%), lack of ethics and professionalism (23%), improper diagnosis (9%), and renewal issues (6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dental disciplinary records offer valuable insights into common instances of misconduct within dental practices. It is essential to approach this information with a critical and reflective mindset, aiming to enhance clinical practice by learning from the common mistakes made by other clinicians.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Understanding the frequency and nature of infractions may promote a deeper awareness and sense of direction regarding where additional focus on ethics and practice management is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Dental Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2024.12.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dental care professionals can gain valuable insights by examining infractions reported to the state board of dentistry, which can serve as a resource to enhance their professional practice. By reviewing various infractions (violations resulting in disciplinary action) reported by the state boards, dental care professionals can foster ethical awareness, uphold professional conduct, manage risks effectively, prioritize patient-centered care, engage in continuous professional development, and promote peer accountability. This study analyzes state dental board disciplinary action data in Texas to identify common infractions among practicing general dentists and to leverage this information as an educational tool for dental care professionals.

Methods: An electronic search of disciplinary actions was conducted, using the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners database. For this study, 1,056 disciplinary action reports were reviewed, and disciplinary infractions were classified into 5 main categories based on the nature of the infractions related to diagnosis, treatment, renewals, recordkeeping, and ethics and professionalism.

Results: After reviewing 1,056 disciplinary actions, the results showed that most infractions were due to inadequate recordkeeping (39%). The rest of the infractions included inadequate treatment (23%), lack of ethics and professionalism (23%), improper diagnosis (9%), and renewal issues (6%).

Conclusions: Dental disciplinary records offer valuable insights into common instances of misconduct within dental practices. It is essential to approach this information with a critical and reflective mindset, aiming to enhance clinical practice by learning from the common mistakes made by other clinicians.

Practical implications: Understanding the frequency and nature of infractions may promote a deeper awareness and sense of direction regarding where additional focus on ethics and practice management is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Dental Association
Journal of the American Dental Association 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: There is not a single source or solution to help dentists in their quest for lifelong learning, improving dental practice, and dental well-being. JADA+, along with The Journal of the American Dental Association, is striving to do just that, bringing together practical content covering dentistry topics and procedures to help dentists—both general dentists and specialists—provide better patient care and improve oral health and well-being. This is a work in progress; as we add more content, covering more topics of interest, it will continue to expand, becoming an ever-more essential source of oral health knowledge.
期刊最新文献
An analysis of dental board disciplinary action among general dentists in Texas. Effectiveness of low-level diode laser in the management of complications after third-molar surgical extraction: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ethical guidance for dentists about offering nonfluoridated toothpaste to patients who request it. Correction Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1