An analysis of dental board disciplinary action among general dentists in Texas

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the American Dental Association Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2024.12.009
Yen-Wen Huang DDS, Sahar Dowlatshahi DDS, MMSc, Srinivas Ayilavarapu BDS, DSc, MDS, Jennifer Chang DDS, MSD, Pooja Maney BDS, MPH, PhD, Sridhar Eswaran BDS, MS, MSD
{"title":"An analysis of dental board disciplinary action among general dentists in Texas","authors":"Yen-Wen Huang DDS,&nbsp;Sahar Dowlatshahi DDS, MMSc,&nbsp;Srinivas Ayilavarapu BDS, DSc, MDS,&nbsp;Jennifer Chang DDS, MSD,&nbsp;Pooja Maney BDS, MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Sridhar Eswaran BDS, MS, MSD","doi":"10.1016/j.adaj.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dental care professionals can gain valuable insights by examining infractions reported to the state board of dentistry, which can serve as a resource to enhance their professional practice. By reviewing various infractions (violations resulting in disciplinary action) reported by the state boards, dental care professionals can foster ethical awareness, uphold professional conduct, manage risks effectively, prioritize patient-centered care, engage in continuous professional development, and promote peer accountability. This study analyzes state dental board disciplinary action data in Texas to identify common infractions among practicing general dentists and to leverage this information as an educational tool for dental care professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An electronic search of disciplinary actions was conducted, using the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners database. For this study, 1,056 disciplinary action reports were reviewed, and disciplinary infractions were classified into 5 main categories based on the nature of the infractions related to diagnosis, treatment, renewals, recordkeeping, and ethics and professionalism.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After reviewing 1,056 disciplinary actions, the results showed that most infractions were due to inadequate recordkeeping (39%). The rest of the infractions included inadequate treatment (23%), lack of ethics and professionalism (23%), improper diagnosis (9%), and renewal issues (6%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Dental disciplinary records offer valuable insights into common instances of misconduct within dental practices. It is essential to approach this information with a critical and reflective mindset, aiming to enhance clinical practice by learning from the common mistakes made by other clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Practical Implications</h3><div>Understanding the frequency and nature of infractions may promote a deeper awareness and sense of direction regarding where additional focus on ethics and practice management is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Dental Association","volume":"156 3","pages":"Pages 225-233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002817725000376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Dental care professionals can gain valuable insights by examining infractions reported to the state board of dentistry, which can serve as a resource to enhance their professional practice. By reviewing various infractions (violations resulting in disciplinary action) reported by the state boards, dental care professionals can foster ethical awareness, uphold professional conduct, manage risks effectively, prioritize patient-centered care, engage in continuous professional development, and promote peer accountability. This study analyzes state dental board disciplinary action data in Texas to identify common infractions among practicing general dentists and to leverage this information as an educational tool for dental care professionals.

Methods

An electronic search of disciplinary actions was conducted, using the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners database. For this study, 1,056 disciplinary action reports were reviewed, and disciplinary infractions were classified into 5 main categories based on the nature of the infractions related to diagnosis, treatment, renewals, recordkeeping, and ethics and professionalism.

Results

After reviewing 1,056 disciplinary actions, the results showed that most infractions were due to inadequate recordkeeping (39%). The rest of the infractions included inadequate treatment (23%), lack of ethics and professionalism (23%), improper diagnosis (9%), and renewal issues (6%).

Conclusions

Dental disciplinary records offer valuable insights into common instances of misconduct within dental practices. It is essential to approach this information with a critical and reflective mindset, aiming to enhance clinical practice by learning from the common mistakes made by other clinicians.

Practical Implications

Understanding the frequency and nature of infractions may promote a deeper awareness and sense of direction regarding where additional focus on ethics and practice management is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析牙科委员会纪律行动在普通牙医在得克萨斯州。
背景:牙科保健专业人员可以通过检查向国家牙科委员会报告的违规行为获得有价值的见解,这可以作为一种资源来提高他们的专业实践。通过审查州委员会报告的各种违规行为(导致纪律处分的违规行为),牙科保健专业人员可以培养道德意识,维护专业行为,有效管理风险,优先考虑以患者为中心的护理,从事持续的专业发展,并促进同行问责制。本研究分析了德克萨斯州州牙科委员会纪律处分数据,以确定执业普通牙医中常见的违规行为,并利用这些信息作为牙科保健专业人员的教育工具。方法:使用德克萨斯州牙科检查委员会数据库进行纪律处分的电子搜索。本研究共审阅了1056份违纪报告,根据违纪行为的性质将违纪行为分为诊断、治疗、续期、记录保存、道德和专业等5大类。结果:在审查了1056次纪律处分后,结果显示大多数违规行为是由于记录保存不充分(39%)。其他违规行为包括治疗不充分(23%),缺乏道德和专业精神(23%),诊断不当(9%)和续期问题(6%)。结论:牙科纪律记录提供了宝贵的见解,常见的情况下,不当行为的牙科实践。必须以批判和反思的心态来处理这些信息,旨在通过从其他临床医生所犯的常见错误中学习来加强临床实践。实际意义:了解违规的频率和性质可以促进更深层次的意识和方向感,了解需要在哪些方面额外关注道德和实践管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Dental Association
Journal of the American Dental Association 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: There is not a single source or solution to help dentists in their quest for lifelong learning, improving dental practice, and dental well-being. JADA+, along with The Journal of the American Dental Association, is striving to do just that, bringing together practical content covering dentistry topics and procedures to help dentists—both general dentists and specialists—provide better patient care and improve oral health and well-being. This is a work in progress; as we add more content, covering more topics of interest, it will continue to expand, becoming an ever-more essential source of oral health knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Swelling associated with a periapical radiolucent lesion of the posterior mandible. Impact of rectangular collimation on the quality and retake of intraoral radiographs. The epistemological gatekeeper in the face of cracks in the ivory tower: The critical role of the dental public health specialist in the posttruth era. We welcome you to a demanding branch of medicine: Reimagining the medical-dental divide. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of dentists regarding regenerative endodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1