The Effect of Gluing Versus Suturing of the Stapler Line in Sleeve Gastrectomy on Weight Loss.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07728-5
Harbi Khalayleh, Ashraf Hallaj, Amir Shweiki, Barak Bar-Zakai, Shimon Sapojnikov, Ashraf Imam, Abed Khalaileh
{"title":"The Effect of Gluing Versus Suturing of the Stapler Line in Sleeve Gastrectomy on Weight Loss.","authors":"Harbi Khalayleh, Ashraf Hallaj, Amir Shweiki, Barak Bar-Zakai, Shimon Sapojnikov, Ashraf Imam, Abed Khalaileh","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07728-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stapler line reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was assessed thoroughly in the context of postoperative complications focusing on leakage and bleeding. However, the effect of stapler line reinforcement techniques on the short- and long-term weight loss is still unclear and lacking. We hypothesize that inverting of the stapler line by Lembert suturing could lead to further additional reduction of the remnant gastric volume and accordingly a more significant weight reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients that underwent LSG (2012-2018) from the two university hospitals. The first hospital routinely performed oversewing with inversion of the stapler line (first group, Lembert suture), while the second university hospital performed LSG without stapler line oversewing and inversion, but routinely used VeraSeal glue (second group, non-Lembert); both groups were compared in terms of weight loss and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred eighty and 550 patients underwent LSG in the first and second hospital, consequently. The mean BMI change and EBWL at 1, 3, and 5 years were better in the first group than in second group. The mean last follow-up BMI was significantly lower in Lembert group (29.8 ± 5.2kg/m<sup>2</sup>) than in non-Lembert group (32.9 ± 6.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), P = 0.001. The mean EBWL at last follow-up point was significantly better for the Lembert group as compared to non-Lembert group (73.7 ± 26.59 versus 57.12 ± 27.71, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lembert suture line oversewing and inversion in LSG is associated with noticeable improvement in weight loss outcomes at 1, 3, and 5 years and last follow-up compared to LSG with VeraSeal gluing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"895-901"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07728-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stapler line reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was assessed thoroughly in the context of postoperative complications focusing on leakage and bleeding. However, the effect of stapler line reinforcement techniques on the short- and long-term weight loss is still unclear and lacking. We hypothesize that inverting of the stapler line by Lembert suturing could lead to further additional reduction of the remnant gastric volume and accordingly a more significant weight reduction.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients that underwent LSG (2012-2018) from the two university hospitals. The first hospital routinely performed oversewing with inversion of the stapler line (first group, Lembert suture), while the second university hospital performed LSG without stapler line oversewing and inversion, but routinely used VeraSeal glue (second group, non-Lembert); both groups were compared in terms of weight loss and complications.

Results: Four hundred eighty and 550 patients underwent LSG in the first and second hospital, consequently. The mean BMI change and EBWL at 1, 3, and 5 years were better in the first group than in second group. The mean last follow-up BMI was significantly lower in Lembert group (29.8 ± 5.2kg/m2) than in non-Lembert group (32.9 ± 6.7 kg/m2), P = 0.001. The mean EBWL at last follow-up point was significantly better for the Lembert group as compared to non-Lembert group (73.7 ± 26.59 versus 57.12 ± 27.71, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Lembert suture line oversewing and inversion in LSG is associated with noticeable improvement in weight loss outcomes at 1, 3, and 5 years and last follow-up compared to LSG with VeraSeal gluing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
套筒胃切除术吻合器线粘接与缝合对减重效果的影响。
背景:在以漏出血为重点的术后并发症的背景下,对袖胃切除术(LSG)期间吻合器线加固进行了全面评估。然而,订书机线加固技术对短期和长期减重的影响尚不清楚和缺乏。我们假设,通过Lembert缝合将订书机线倒置可以进一步减少残胃体积,从而更显著地减轻体重。方法:回顾性分析两所大学附属医院2012-2018年行LSG的患者。第一医院常规缝合缝合钉线反转(第一组,Lembert缝合),第二大学医院行LSG,不缝合钉线反转,但常规使用VeraSeal胶(第二组,非Lembert缝合);两组在体重减轻和并发症方面进行比较。结果:在第一医院和第二医院分别有480,550例患者接受了LSG治疗。第一组患者1、3、5年平均BMI变化及EBWL均优于第二组。Lembert组患者末次随访平均BMI(29.8±5.2kg/m2)显著低于非Lembert组(32.9±6.7 kg/m2), P = 0.001。最后随访时,Lembert组的平均EBWL明显优于非Lembert组(73.7±26.59比57.12±27.71,P = 0.001)。结论:与使用VeraSeal胶合术的LSG相比,Lembert缝合线覆盖和内翻在1年、3年和5年以及最后一次随访时的体重减轻结果显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Modulators for the Management of Dumping Syndrome in Patients Who have Undergone Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: a Scoping Review. Hormone PYY does not Explain the Variability in Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis. Correction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life After Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): a Cross-Sectional Study with 283 Patients from a Single Institution. National Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery in Patients with History of Bariatric Surgery. Combined Proximal Revision and Moderate Distalization After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Retrospective Single-Center Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1