A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating gender differences in in-hospital, short-term and long-term outcomes among patients who underwent primary PCI.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Minerva cardiology and angiology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06670-5
Iva Patel, Pooja Vyas, Anand Shukla, Pratik Shah, Deepanshu Assudani, Khushboo Chauhan
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating gender differences in in-hospital, short-term and long-term outcomes among patients who underwent primary PCI.","authors":"Iva Patel, Pooja Vyas, Anand Shukla, Pratik Shah, Deepanshu Assudani, Khushboo Chauhan","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06670-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To assess how gender disparities impact major adverse cardiovascular events during hospitalization, as well as in the short and long term, among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary PCI.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane database were searched for relevant studies. Studies were included if all comers with STEMI, reported gender specific patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using random effect model.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 23 studies were included for the pooled meta-analysis. Average age of female at presentation was 68.61±3.91 years while in male was 60.83±2.48 years. In unadjusted analysis, female patients were at higher risk for mortality (OR=1.98, 95% CI: 1.71-2.30, P<0.0001, I<sup>2</sup>=35%) at hospitalization, (OR=2.25, 95% CI=1.75-2.88, P≤0.00001) at short term and (OR=1.76, 95% CI: 1.41-2.21, P<0.000, I<sup>2</sup>=68%) at long term. The adjusted analysis of major adverse cardiovascular events for short term (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.91-1.31, P=0.37, I<sup>2</sup>=76%) and long term (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.98-1.12, P=0.17, I<sup>2</sup>=37%) were not found significant between both genders. However, it remained significant during hospitalization (OR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.22, I<sup>2</sup>=15%, Tau<sup>2</sup>=0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this comprehensive meta-analysis indicate higher major adverse cardiac events among women with STEMI who underwent PPCI. After adjusting for comorbidities, the difference between women and men showed insignificant at short term and long term but remained significant at in-hospital. Female patients exhibited a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors than men. Implementing intensive cardiovascular risk reduction strategies in women may offer a pathway to address this gender disparity.</p>","PeriodicalId":18668,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06670-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To assess how gender disparities impact major adverse cardiovascular events during hospitalization, as well as in the short and long term, among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary PCI.

Evidence acquisition: PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane database were searched for relevant studies. Studies were included if all comers with STEMI, reported gender specific patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using random effect model.

Evidence synthesis: A total of 23 studies were included for the pooled meta-analysis. Average age of female at presentation was 68.61±3.91 years while in male was 60.83±2.48 years. In unadjusted analysis, female patients were at higher risk for mortality (OR=1.98, 95% CI: 1.71-2.30, P<0.0001, I2=35%) at hospitalization, (OR=2.25, 95% CI=1.75-2.88, P≤0.00001) at short term and (OR=1.76, 95% CI: 1.41-2.21, P<0.000, I2=68%) at long term. The adjusted analysis of major adverse cardiovascular events for short term (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.91-1.31, P=0.37, I2=76%) and long term (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.98-1.12, P=0.17, I2=37%) were not found significant between both genders. However, it remained significant during hospitalization (OR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.22, I2=15%, Tau2=0.00).

Conclusions: The findings of this comprehensive meta-analysis indicate higher major adverse cardiac events among women with STEMI who underwent PPCI. After adjusting for comorbidities, the difference between women and men showed insignificant at short term and long term but remained significant at in-hospital. Female patients exhibited a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors than men. Implementing intensive cardiovascular risk reduction strategies in women may offer a pathway to address this gender disparity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardiology and angiology
Minerva cardiology and angiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating gender differences in in-hospital, short-term and long-term outcomes among patients who underwent primary PCI. Clinical utility of myocardial work assessment in arterial hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Prognostic utility of assessing ventricular-arterial coupling in arterial hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The effect of propolis supplementation on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Eosinophilic myocarditis: from etiology to diagnostics and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1