A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial Comparing Oral Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, and Gabapentin on Prophylaxis of Emergence Agitation After Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Adenotonsillectomy.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Mohammad Fouad Algyar, Ahmed Mohammed Abdelghany, Sherif Kamal Arafa, Amir Abouzkry Elsayed
{"title":"A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial Comparing Oral Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, and Gabapentin on Prophylaxis of Emergence Agitation After Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Adenotonsillectomy.","authors":"Mohammad Fouad Algyar, Ahmed Mohammed Abdelghany, Sherif Kamal Arafa, Amir Abouzkry Elsayed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sevoflurane causes emergence agitation (EA) in up to 80% of pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Using midazolam, dexmedetomidine (DEX), and gabapentin, this work aimed to assess the prophylactic effect of oral premedication on EA incidence experienced by pediatric patients during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed on 240 men and women aged 3 to 10 years who were scheduled for adenotonsillectomy. Patients were randomized into 4 equal-sized groups. Thirty minutes before general anesthesia, oral premedication was applied in the form an apple-flavored sugary fluid plus 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam in Group M, 4 µg/kg of DEX in Group D, 10 mg/kg of gabapentin in Group G, or no drugs whatsoever in Group P (placebo).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of EA was reduced more greatly in the M, D, and G groups than in the P group, and the D group's incidence of EA was lower than that of the M or G groups. The severity of EA exhibited a more significant reduction in the M, D, and G groups than in Group P. Similarly, the time until extubation was more prolonged in the M, D, and G groups than it was in the P group. Hemodynamics measurements were significantly lower in Groups M, D, and G than in Group P, and the D group had a lower hemodynamics measurement than did the M or G groups. Sedation scores were greater in the D and G groups than in the P group, and the D group had a higher sedation score than did Group M.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study used a small sample, took place at a single center, and had a short follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Premedication using oral midazolam, DEX, or gabapentin reduced the incidence of EA, and DEX provided the best sedation and hemodynamics of all.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 1","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sevoflurane causes emergence agitation (EA) in up to 80% of pediatric patients.

Objectives: Using midazolam, dexmedetomidine (DEX), and gabapentin, this work aimed to assess the prophylactic effect of oral premedication on EA incidence experienced by pediatric patients during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.

Methods: This study was performed on 240 men and women aged 3 to 10 years who were scheduled for adenotonsillectomy. Patients were randomized into 4 equal-sized groups. Thirty minutes before general anesthesia, oral premedication was applied in the form an apple-flavored sugary fluid plus 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam in Group M, 4 µg/kg of DEX in Group D, 10 mg/kg of gabapentin in Group G, or no drugs whatsoever in Group P (placebo).

Results: The incidence of EA was reduced more greatly in the M, D, and G groups than in the P group, and the D group's incidence of EA was lower than that of the M or G groups. The severity of EA exhibited a more significant reduction in the M, D, and G groups than in Group P. Similarly, the time until extubation was more prolonged in the M, D, and G groups than it was in the P group. Hemodynamics measurements were significantly lower in Groups M, D, and G than in Group P, and the D group had a lower hemodynamics measurement than did the M or G groups. Sedation scores were greater in the D and G groups than in the P group, and the D group had a higher sedation score than did Group M.

Limitations: This study used a small sample, took place at a single center, and had a short follow-up period.

Conclusion: Premedication using oral midazolam, DEX, or gabapentin reduced the incidence of EA, and DEX provided the best sedation and hemodynamics of all.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
期刊最新文献
Association Between 25-hydroxyvitamin D Status and New Vertebral Fractures Post Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation in Patients During Postmenopause: A Retrospective Case-control Study. Clinical Trial of Ozonated Water Enema for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. Comment on "A Novel Sequential Percutaneous Radiofrequency Treatment Strategy for Drug-refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Propensity Score-matched Study". Comment on "Comparative Study Between the Analgesic Effect of Prednisolone and Pregabalin in Managing Post Dural Puncture Headache after Lower-limb Surgeries". Comment on "Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Suprascapular Nerve Blocks and Intraarticular Corticosteroid Injections for Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1