Behind the label: a qualitative study of the self-perceptions of individuals with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09152-y
Alanna K Chu, Wardat Yasmine Sehabi, Emma Kearns, Tim Aubry, Rinat Nissim, Paul Wheatley-Price, Sophie Lebel
{"title":"Behind the label: a qualitative study of the self-perceptions of individuals with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy.","authors":"Alanna K Chu, Wardat Yasmine Sehabi, Emma Kearns, Tim Aubry, Rinat Nissim, Paul Wheatley-Price, Sophie Lebel","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09152-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals with lung cancer are living longer due to recent treatment advances such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy. The preferred label(s) of this new population are unknown. This is important as personal/advocacy benefits have been reported by using \"survivor\" or \"thriver\" by some groups; however, these same labels have been rejected by others. The goal of the present study was to explore the meaning of different labels and reasons given for preferred label(s) among people diagnosed with advanced lung cancer receiving these treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is part of a larger project conducted in partnership with Lung Cancer Canada to identify the supportive care needs of individuals with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Participants (n = 24) were recruited across Canada. In-depth qualitative interviews were coded using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Labels are important and serve four functions: meaning-making, acceptance, maintaining a positive outlook, and shaping how people in participants' circle understand and react to them. Participants felt their experience did not fit traditional labels. While \"survivor\" was associated with maintaining a positive outlook by some, it was strongly rejected by others as it implied a cure. Some felt \"patient\" conveyed realism, but others found it deprived them of empowerment. \"Person living with cancer\" was perceived as reflecting the ongoing nature of the disease while not overly centring cancer within a person's identity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants identified with various labels and emphasized how the label reflected their identity and psychological experiences of the disease. Thus, it is important that clinicians elicit and use individuals' preferred terms, and default to person-first language if unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 3","pages":"152"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09152-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Individuals with lung cancer are living longer due to recent treatment advances such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy. The preferred label(s) of this new population are unknown. This is important as personal/advocacy benefits have been reported by using "survivor" or "thriver" by some groups; however, these same labels have been rejected by others. The goal of the present study was to explore the meaning of different labels and reasons given for preferred label(s) among people diagnosed with advanced lung cancer receiving these treatments.

Methods: The study is part of a larger project conducted in partnership with Lung Cancer Canada to identify the supportive care needs of individuals with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Participants (n = 24) were recruited across Canada. In-depth qualitative interviews were coded using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Labels are important and serve four functions: meaning-making, acceptance, maintaining a positive outlook, and shaping how people in participants' circle understand and react to them. Participants felt their experience did not fit traditional labels. While "survivor" was associated with maintaining a positive outlook by some, it was strongly rejected by others as it implied a cure. Some felt "patient" conveyed realism, but others found it deprived them of empowerment. "Person living with cancer" was perceived as reflecting the ongoing nature of the disease while not overly centring cancer within a person's identity.

Conclusion: Participants identified with various labels and emphasized how the label reflected their identity and psychological experiences of the disease. Thus, it is important that clinicians elicit and use individuals' preferred terms, and default to person-first language if unknown.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标签背后:一项接受免疫治疗或靶向治疗的晚期肺癌患者自我认知的定性研究。
目的:由于最近的治疗进展,如免疫治疗和靶向治疗,肺癌患者的寿命延长了。这个新群体的首选标签是未知的。这一点很重要,因为一些团体通过使用“幸存者”或“幸存者”来报告个人/宣传利益;然而,同样的标签也被其他人拒绝了。本研究的目的是探讨在接受这些治疗的晚期肺癌患者中,不同标签的含义和首选标签的原因。方法:该研究是与加拿大肺癌协会(Lung Cancer Canada)合作开展的一个大型项目的一部分,该项目旨在确定接受免疫治疗或靶向治疗的晚期肺癌患者的支持性护理需求。参与者(n = 24)在加拿大各地招募。使用反身性专题分析对深度定性访谈进行编码。结果:标签是很重要的,有四个功能:意义制造、接受、保持积极的前景,以及塑造参与者圈子里的人如何理解和回应他们。参与者认为他们的经历不符合传统的标签。虽然“幸存者”与一些人保持积极的态度有关,但也有人强烈反对,因为它意味着治愈。一些人觉得“耐心”传达了现实主义,但另一些人认为这剥夺了他们的权力。“癌症患者”被认为反映了疾病的持续性质,而不是将癌症过度地集中在一个人的身份中。结论:参与者认同各种标签,并强调标签如何反映他们的身份和疾病的心理体验。因此,重要的是临床医生引出和使用个人喜欢的术语,如果未知,默认使用第一人称语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Mapping the unmet supportive care needs of cancer patients, survivors, and caregivers: results from a cross-sectional survey. Examining the quality of life in caregivers of patients with urologic cancer: A cross-sectional study in Crete, Greece. Public perceptions of AI-assisted cancer care in Abu Dhabi, UAE: A cross-sectional survey. The application of home enteral nutrition in cancer patients: a scoping review. Effect of patient education in improving quality of life, fatigue and anxiety in people diagnosed with lung cancer: systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1