The perspectives and experiences of older LGBTI+ adults about long-term care: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf048
Sarah McMullen-Roach, Saravana Kumar, Maria Inacio, Carolyn Murray
{"title":"The perspectives and experiences of older LGBTI+ adults about long-term care: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.","authors":"Sarah McMullen-Roach, Saravana Kumar, Maria Inacio, Carolyn Murray","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>LGBTI+ older adults have experienced historical and systemic discrimination. Such discrimination has led to health inequities and avoidance of services. As LGBTI+ people age, they may need to access services, but information about this experience is situated in small scale qualitative studies. As such this, meta-synthesis aimed to bring together the perspectives and experiences of LGBTI+ older adults in literature about engagement with long-term care services.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A meta-synthesis with a meta-ethnographic approach was conducted with qualitative published and grey literature. Findings were then confirmed through community consultation conducted with LGBTI+ adults aged 50.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 qualitative studies were included in the meta synthesis. LGBTI+ older adults' perspectives and experiences were synthesised into 4 key themes: 1) We see it as being heterosexualised, 2) With no-one there to guard us, 3) You have to hide 90% of yourself, 4) I don't want a different service, I want a good service.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Overarching heterosexism, experiences of discrimination, and complexities in maintaining identity all contributed to a predominately negative experience for LGBTI+ adults when engaging with long-term care. These experiences were found to align with 'minority stress' theory. Our review found a multilevel approach that included staff education, LGBTI+ affirmative care and signs and symbols of inclusivity was required to reduce the impact of minority stress experienced by LGBTI+ older adults and increased their engagement in long-term care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: LGBTI+ older adults have experienced historical and systemic discrimination. Such discrimination has led to health inequities and avoidance of services. As LGBTI+ people age, they may need to access services, but information about this experience is situated in small scale qualitative studies. As such this, meta-synthesis aimed to bring together the perspectives and experiences of LGBTI+ older adults in literature about engagement with long-term care services.

Research design and methods: A meta-synthesis with a meta-ethnographic approach was conducted with qualitative published and grey literature. Findings were then confirmed through community consultation conducted with LGBTI+ adults aged 50.

Results: A total of 55 qualitative studies were included in the meta synthesis. LGBTI+ older adults' perspectives and experiences were synthesised into 4 key themes: 1) We see it as being heterosexualised, 2) With no-one there to guard us, 3) You have to hide 90% of yourself, 4) I don't want a different service, I want a good service.

Discussion and implications: Overarching heterosexism, experiences of discrimination, and complexities in maintaining identity all contributed to a predominately negative experience for LGBTI+ adults when engaging with long-term care. These experiences were found to align with 'minority stress' theory. Our review found a multilevel approach that included staff education, LGBTI+ affirmative care and signs and symbols of inclusivity was required to reduce the impact of minority stress experienced by LGBTI+ older adults and increased their engagement in long-term care services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Building Survey Data Infrastructure on Aging: The Legacy of NIA. Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility of a Mobile App-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Caregiver Stress. A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Visual Cues, Signage, and Spaced-Retrieval for Wayfinding within Long-Term Care Communities. How Does Age Matter? Investigating Financial Strain, Health, and Well-Being among Adults Who Need Long-Term Services and Supports. Promoting Housing Stability through Eviction Prevention for Older Adults in Social Housing: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1