Management of genetically determined kidney stone disease: consensus from a panel of urologists and nephrologists.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Minerva Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05875-0
Roberto Miano, Giovanni Gambaro, Corrado Vitale, Giuseppe Vezzoli, Michele Talso, Stefania Ferretti, Michele Raguso, Pietro M Ferraro
{"title":"Management of genetically determined kidney stone disease: consensus from a panel of urologists and nephrologists.","authors":"Roberto Miano, Giovanni Gambaro, Corrado Vitale, Giuseppe Vezzoli, Michele Talso, Stefania Ferretti, Michele Raguso, Pietro M Ferraro","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05875-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Available evidence suggests that monogenic causes of kidney stones are likely under-diagnosed, particularly in young adults, needing expert multidisciplinary recommendations to improve diagnosis, management and therapeutic outcomes. To increase the awareness among the medical community on the recognition of the signs and symptoms of genetically determined kidney stone disease in adult patients, with a special focus on primary hyperoxaluria (PH), a group of nephrologists and urologists started a consensus process through the Delphi method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of 40 statements (23 regarding genetically determined stone disease and 17 regarding primary hyperoxaluria) was defined by the authors and included in an online Delphi survey, which was sent to 16 urologists and 22 nephrologists with expertise in managing patients with kidney stone disease. An agreement threshold of 75% was established for consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After two rounds of Delphi voting, consensus was reached for 33 statements, 18 regarding genetically determined stone disease and 15 regarding PH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Delphi process highlighted several areas of agreement with regard to the characteristic or anamnestic data suggesting diagnostic investigation, optimal diagnostic patterns, treatment strategies and management of patients with genetically determined nephrolithiasis. The process also highlighted some grey areas, which deserve further investigation and highlight the need for educational initiatives focused on rare diseases in the field of kidney stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"130-136"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05875-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Available evidence suggests that monogenic causes of kidney stones are likely under-diagnosed, particularly in young adults, needing expert multidisciplinary recommendations to improve diagnosis, management and therapeutic outcomes. To increase the awareness among the medical community on the recognition of the signs and symptoms of genetically determined kidney stone disease in adult patients, with a special focus on primary hyperoxaluria (PH), a group of nephrologists and urologists started a consensus process through the Delphi method.

Methods: A list of 40 statements (23 regarding genetically determined stone disease and 17 regarding primary hyperoxaluria) was defined by the authors and included in an online Delphi survey, which was sent to 16 urologists and 22 nephrologists with expertise in managing patients with kidney stone disease. An agreement threshold of 75% was established for consensus.

Results: After two rounds of Delphi voting, consensus was reached for 33 statements, 18 regarding genetically determined stone disease and 15 regarding PH.

Conclusions: The Delphi process highlighted several areas of agreement with regard to the characteristic or anamnestic data suggesting diagnostic investigation, optimal diagnostic patterns, treatment strategies and management of patients with genetically determined nephrolithiasis. The process also highlighted some grey areas, which deserve further investigation and highlight the need for educational initiatives focused on rare diseases in the field of kidney stones.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传决定的肾结石疾病的管理:泌尿科医生和肾病专家小组的共识。
背景:现有证据表明,肾结石的单基因原因很可能诊断不足,特别是在年轻人中,需要多学科专家的建议来改善诊断、管理和治疗结果。为了提高医学界对成年患者遗传决定的肾结石疾病的体征和症状的认识,特别关注原发性高草酸尿症(PH),一组肾病学家和泌尿科医生通过德尔菲法开始了共识过程。方法:作者定义了40个陈述(23个关于遗传决定的结石疾病,17个关于原发性高草酸尿症),并将其纳入在线德尔菲调查,该调查被发送给16名泌尿科医生和22名具有管理肾结石患者专业知识的肾脏科医生。建立了75%的共识阈值。结果:经过两轮德尔菲投票,达成了33项共识,其中18项关于遗传决定的结石疾病,15项关于ph。结论:德尔菲过程强调了关于特征或记忆数据的几个方面的一致意见,建议对遗传决定的肾结石患者进行诊断调查、最佳诊断模式、治疗策略和管理。这一过程还突出了一些灰色地带,值得进一步调查,并突出了在肾结石领域开展以罕见疾病为重点的教育活动的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
期刊最新文献
Office-based transperineal laser ablation in patients with large prostates (≥80 mL): real-world evidence of safety and efficacy from a prospective single center cohort. The updated 2021 EAU risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: what have we learned four years after implementation? Multicentric evaluation of a lateral-based anterior vaginal wall flap for female urethral stricture repair. External validation and comparison of nomograms for prediction of long-term disease recurrence and survival for bladder cancer patients who undergo radical cystectomy. Soft ureteral stents significantly reduce stent-related symptoms compared to firm ureteral stents: a prospective, randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1