Management and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Aneurysms: A Patient-level Systematic Review.

Daler Rahimov, Nayeem Nasher, Danial Ahmad, Rohinton J Morris, Anjali Upadhyaya, Colin Yost, Daniella Wong, Preeyal Patel, Alec Vishnevsky, Nicholas J Ruggiero, John W Entwistle, Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
{"title":"Management and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Aneurysms: A Patient-level Systematic Review.","authors":"Daler Rahimov, Nayeem Nasher, Danial Ahmad, Rohinton J Morris, Anjali Upadhyaya, Colin Yost, Daniella Wong, Preeyal Patel, Alec Vishnevsky, Nicholas J Ruggiero, John W Entwistle, Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data are lacking to guide standardized management of coronary artery aneurysms (CAA). We sought to analyze the available evidence in a quantitative manner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic search identified 431 case reports or case series on CAA, comprising 488 patients. Patient-level data were extracted. Subgroups with (CAAF) and without fistulous connections (CAAO) were analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fistulous connection was present in 24.0% (117/488) of patients with CAA. Angina was a presenting symptom in 64.7% (301/465), with higher preponderance in the CAAO group [CAAO: 71.1 % (249/350) vs CAAF: 45.2% (52/115), p<0.01). Median largest aneurysm diameter was higher in the CAAF group [CAAO: 3.0 [1.5-5.0] cm vs CAAF: 5.0 [3.0-7.0], p<0.01], and rupture was more frequently observed in the CAAF group [CAAO: 3.1% (11/353) vs CAAF: 13.8% (16/116), p<0.01]. For any given diameter, CAAF had a higher risk of rupture compared to CAAO. Surgery was the most common management strategy, particularly in patients with CAAF [CAAO: 50.9% (189/371) vs CAAF: 75.2% (88/117), p<0.01]. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a trend toward more favorable survival in CAAF. Hazard of mortality was associated with aneurysm diameter in both subsets but was higher in the CAAO group independent of surgical vs interventional management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAAF appears to have a higher risk of rupture but may be associated with better survival than CAAO. Management for patients with CAA differs based on presence or absence of fistula, however, both surgical and interventional mode of management result in similar survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data are lacking to guide standardized management of coronary artery aneurysms (CAA). We sought to analyze the available evidence in a quantitative manner.

Methods: Electronic search identified 431 case reports or case series on CAA, comprising 488 patients. Patient-level data were extracted. Subgroups with (CAAF) and without fistulous connections (CAAO) were analyzed separately.

Results: Fistulous connection was present in 24.0% (117/488) of patients with CAA. Angina was a presenting symptom in 64.7% (301/465), with higher preponderance in the CAAO group [CAAO: 71.1 % (249/350) vs CAAF: 45.2% (52/115), p<0.01). Median largest aneurysm diameter was higher in the CAAF group [CAAO: 3.0 [1.5-5.0] cm vs CAAF: 5.0 [3.0-7.0], p<0.01], and rupture was more frequently observed in the CAAF group [CAAO: 3.1% (11/353) vs CAAF: 13.8% (16/116), p<0.01]. For any given diameter, CAAF had a higher risk of rupture compared to CAAO. Surgery was the most common management strategy, particularly in patients with CAAF [CAAO: 50.9% (189/371) vs CAAF: 75.2% (88/117), p<0.01]. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a trend toward more favorable survival in CAAF. Hazard of mortality was associated with aneurysm diameter in both subsets but was higher in the CAAO group independent of surgical vs interventional management.

Conclusion: CAAF appears to have a higher risk of rupture but may be associated with better survival than CAAO. Management for patients with CAA differs based on presence or absence of fistula, however, both surgical and interventional mode of management result in similar survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
期刊最新文献
Management and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Aneurysms: A Patient-level Systematic Review. Rewarding twenty-year experience with initial and repeat EKG and echocardiographic screening for prevention of sudden death in detecting abnormal findings. Prevalence of some cardiovascular risk factors: obesity, hypertension, and smoking among medical students. Access to non-physician led Exercise Stress Echocardiography reduces wait times and improves consumer engagement. Advancements in Serum Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis and Prognostic Assessment of Aortic Dissection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1