Chao Gong, Shengyong Xu, Youlong Pan, Shigong Guo, Joseph Harold Walline, Xue Wang, Xin Lu, Shiyuan Yu, Mubing Qin, Huadong Zhu, Yanxia Gao, Yi Li
{"title":"Effects of probiotic treatment on the prognosis of patients with sepsis: a systematic review.","authors":"Chao Gong, Shengyong Xu, Youlong Pan, Shigong Guo, Joseph Harold Walline, Xue Wang, Xin Lu, Shiyuan Yu, Mubing Qin, Huadong Zhu, Yanxia Gao, Yi Li","doi":"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis, a common acute and critical disease, leads to 11 million deaths annually worldwide. Probiotics are living microorganisms that are beneficial to the host and may benefit sepsis outcomes, but their effects are still inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the overall effect of probiotics on the prognosis of patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Data resources: </strong>We searched several sources for published/presented studies, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and the US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials Register (www.clinicaltrials.gov) updated through July 30, 2023, to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies that assessed the effectiveness of probiotics or synbiotics in patients with sepsis and reported mortality. We focused primarily on mortality during the study period and analyzed secondary outcomes, including 28-day mortality, in-intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 405 patients in five RCTs and 108 patients in one cohort study were included in the analysis. The overall quality of the studies was satisfactory, but clinical heterogeneity existed. All adult studies reported a tendency for probiotics to reduce the mortality of patients with sepsis, and most studies reported a decreasing trend in the incidence of infectious complications, length of ICU stay and duration of antibiotic use. There was only one RCT involving children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Probiotics show promise for improving the prognosis of patients with sepsis, including reducing mortality and the incidence of infectious complications, particularly in adult patients. Despite the limited number of studies, especially in children, these findings will be encouraging for clinical practice in the treatment of sepsis and suggest that gut microbiota-targeted therapy may improve the prognosis of patients with sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23685,"journal":{"name":"World journal of emergency medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sepsis, a common acute and critical disease, leads to 11 million deaths annually worldwide. Probiotics are living microorganisms that are beneficial to the host and may benefit sepsis outcomes, but their effects are still inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the overall effect of probiotics on the prognosis of patients with sepsis.
Data resources: We searched several sources for published/presented studies, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and the US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials Register (www.clinicaltrials.gov) updated through July 30, 2023, to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies that assessed the effectiveness of probiotics or synbiotics in patients with sepsis and reported mortality. We focused primarily on mortality during the study period and analyzed secondary outcomes, including 28-day mortality, in-intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and other outcomes.
Results: Data from 405 patients in five RCTs and 108 patients in one cohort study were included in the analysis. The overall quality of the studies was satisfactory, but clinical heterogeneity existed. All adult studies reported a tendency for probiotics to reduce the mortality of patients with sepsis, and most studies reported a decreasing trend in the incidence of infectious complications, length of ICU stay and duration of antibiotic use. There was only one RCT involving children.
Conclusion: Probiotics show promise for improving the prognosis of patients with sepsis, including reducing mortality and the incidence of infectious complications, particularly in adult patients. Despite the limited number of studies, especially in children, these findings will be encouraging for clinical practice in the treatment of sepsis and suggest that gut microbiota-targeted therapy may improve the prognosis of patients with sepsis.
背景:败血症是一种常见的急性危重症,每年在全世界导致1100万人死亡。益生菌是对宿主有益的活微生物,可能有利于败血症的预后,但它们的作用仍不确定。本研究旨在评估益生菌对脓毒症患者预后的总体影响。数据资源:我们检索了多个已发表/提交的研究来源,包括PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和美国国家医学图书馆临床试验注册(www.clinicaltrials.gov),更新至2023年7月30日,以确定所有相关的随机对照试验(rct)或观察性研究,评估益生菌或合成菌对败血症患者的有效性和报告的死亡率。我们主要关注研究期间的死亡率,并分析次要结局,包括28天死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率和其他结局。结果:分析纳入了5项随机对照试验的405例患者和1项队列研究的108例患者的数据。研究的总体质量令人满意,但存在临床异质性。所有的成人研究都报告了益生菌降低脓毒症患者死亡率的趋势,大多数研究报告了感染并发症发生率、ICU住院时间和抗生素使用时间的下降趋势。只有一项涉及儿童的随机对照试验。结论:益生菌有望改善脓毒症患者的预后,包括降低死亡率和感染并发症的发生率,特别是在成人患者中。尽管研究数量有限,特别是在儿童中,这些发现将对脓毒症治疗的临床实践产生鼓舞作用,并表明肠道微生物群靶向治疗可能改善脓毒症患者的预后。
期刊介绍:
The journal will cover technical, clinical and bioengineering studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of emergency medicine, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute injury, out-of-hospital emergency medical service, intensive care, injury and disease prevention, disaster management, healthy policy and ethics, toxicology, and sudden illness, including cardiology, internal medicine, anesthesiology, orthopedics, and trauma care, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review questions, and more. Editorials and communications to the editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with emergency medicine.