Clinical effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab plus TKI as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a single-center retrospective study.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s00345-025-05443-5
Xi Zhong, Tingxuan Huang, Yulu Peng, Wensu Wei, Zhiling Zhang, Hui Han, Pei Dong
{"title":"Clinical effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab plus TKI as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Xi Zhong, Tingxuan Huang, Yulu Peng, Wensu Wei, Zhiling Zhang, Hui Han, Pei Dong","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05443-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The therapeutic efficacy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been significantly enhanced with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, there are limited data on the efficacy of Tislelizumab in patients with mRCC. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Tislelizumab plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for patients with mRCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic and clinicopathological data of mRCC patients treated with first-line TKI monotherapy or Tislelizumab plus TKI therapy between March 2019 to February 2023 were collected. Outcome measures included the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS). Patient baseline characteristics and adverse events (AEs) were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 136 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 57 years. Of the patients, 72.1% were male, 78.8% with intermediate/poor-risk disease. For the overall population, the combination group (n = 61) exhibited a longer PFS compared to the TKI monotherapy group (n = 75) (mPFS (95% CI): 15.9 (10.9-20.9) vs. 6.2 (5.4-6.9) months, P < 0.001) and improved ORR (44.3% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.001). In the non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) subgroup (n = 39), the combination group (n = 20) showed improved PFS (mPFS (95% CI): 11.9 (0.6-23.3) vs. 4.6 (3.4-5.9) months, P < 0.001) and ORR (40.0% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.006) compared to the TKI monotherapy group (n = 19). The incidence of grade three or higher treatment-related AEs are comparable between the groups (47.54% vs. 40.00%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data demonstrated the promising efficacy and safety profile of Tislelizumab plus TKI as first-line treatment for both ccRCC and nccRCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05443-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The therapeutic efficacy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been significantly enhanced with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, there are limited data on the efficacy of Tislelizumab in patients with mRCC. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Tislelizumab plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for patients with mRCC.

Methods: Demographic and clinicopathological data of mRCC patients treated with first-line TKI monotherapy or Tislelizumab plus TKI therapy between March 2019 to February 2023 were collected. Outcome measures included the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS). Patient baseline characteristics and adverse events (AEs) were documented.

Results: Totally 136 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 57 years. Of the patients, 72.1% were male, 78.8% with intermediate/poor-risk disease. For the overall population, the combination group (n = 61) exhibited a longer PFS compared to the TKI monotherapy group (n = 75) (mPFS (95% CI): 15.9 (10.9-20.9) vs. 6.2 (5.4-6.9) months, P < 0.001) and improved ORR (44.3% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.001). In the non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) subgroup (n = 39), the combination group (n = 20) showed improved PFS (mPFS (95% CI): 11.9 (0.6-23.3) vs. 4.6 (3.4-5.9) months, P < 0.001) and ORR (40.0% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.006) compared to the TKI monotherapy group (n = 19). The incidence of grade three or higher treatment-related AEs are comparable between the groups (47.54% vs. 40.00%).

Conclusion: Our data demonstrated the promising efficacy and safety profile of Tislelizumab plus TKI as first-line treatment for both ccRCC and nccRCC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
tislelizumab联合TKI作为转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者一线治疗的临床有效性和安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究
目的:随着免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的出现,转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的治疗效果显著提高。然而,Tislelizumab在mRCC患者中的疗效数据有限。本研究旨在评估Tislelizumab联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗mRCC患者的有效性和安全性。方法:收集2019年3月至2023年2月期间接受一线TKI单药治疗或替利单抗加TKI治疗的mRCC患者的人口学和临床病理资料。结果测量包括客观缓解率(ORR)、中位无进展生存期(mPFS)。记录患者基线特征和不良事件(ae)。结果:136例患者纳入分析,中位年龄为57岁。72.1%为男性,78.8%为中/低危患者。对于总体人群,联合治疗组(n = 61)比TKI单药治疗组(n = 75)表现出更长的PFS (mPFS (95% CI): 15.9(10.9-20.9)比6.2(5.4-6.9)个月,P结论:我们的数据显示Tislelizumab联合TKI作为一线治疗ccRCC和nccRCC的有希望的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
Testing reliability of pubourethral ligament hemostat forceps support test for diagnosis of stress incontinence. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate as salvage therapy for benign prostatic obstruction after multiple prior surgical interventions. Intrarenal pressure and clinical outcomes during suction-assisted versus conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Safety and efficacy of different surgical approaches in single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on propensity score matching analysis. Comment on "Nurse-led postoperative telemonitoring program following outpatient urethroplasty: a pilot study".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1