Trends in Outpatient Radical Prostatectomy and Same-Day Discharge for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000778
Grant M Henning, Ekamjit S Deol, Ranveer M Vasdev, Spyridon P Basourakos, David Y Yang, Matthew K Tollefson, Igor Frank, Paras Shah, Abhinav Khanna, R Jeffrey Karnes, Stephen A Boorjian, Vidit Sharma
{"title":"Trends in Outpatient Radical Prostatectomy and Same-Day Discharge for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample.","authors":"Grant M Henning, Ekamjit S Deol, Ranveer M Vasdev, Spyridon P Basourakos, David Y Yang, Matthew K Tollefson, Igor Frank, Paras Shah, Abhinav Khanna, R Jeffrey Karnes, Stephen A Boorjian, Vidit Sharma","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interest has grown in optimizing radical prostatectomy (RP) pathways for prostate cancer, and RP has been removed from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services inpatient-only list. We aim to determine national trends in outpatient RP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Inpatient Survey and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Survey were queried to categorize RPs between 2016 and 2020 as inpatient RP and outpatient RPs, comprising same-day discharge (SDD) and ambulatory encounters. Trends in outpatient RP over time were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with SDD. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to compare total hospital charges between SDD and inpatient RPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 362,123 RPs from 2016 to 2020, outpatient RPs increased from 4.8% to 53.7% (<i>P</i> < .01) and SDD increased from 0.03% to 2.0% (<i>P</i> < .01). Minimally invasive surgery (OR, 1.59, <i>P</i> < .01), highest quartile annual hospital caseload (OR, 1.98, <i>P</i> = .01), and low hospital bed count (OR, 1.96, <i>P</i> = .03) were associated with SDD. Less than 20% of centers used SDD, although a select few hospitals discharged more than 50% of RPs the same day. Ambulatory ($63,060) and SDD ($63,332) RPs had lower total charges compared with inpatient RPs ($69,951). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that SDD was associated with a reduction in total charges (OR, 0.88, <i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over 50% of RPs are now performed as ambulatory or SDD encounters. SDD RP is more common in high-volume facilities with lower bed counts. Although our data suggest lower hospital charges, further study is warranted to evaluate the impact of SDD on readmission rates and direct patient costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000778"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interest has grown in optimizing radical prostatectomy (RP) pathways for prostate cancer, and RP has been removed from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services inpatient-only list. We aim to determine national trends in outpatient RP.

Methods: The National Inpatient Survey and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Survey were queried to categorize RPs between 2016 and 2020 as inpatient RP and outpatient RPs, comprising same-day discharge (SDD) and ambulatory encounters. Trends in outpatient RP over time were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with SDD. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to compare total hospital charges between SDD and inpatient RPs.

Results: In a cohort of 362,123 RPs from 2016 to 2020, outpatient RPs increased from 4.8% to 53.7% (P < .01) and SDD increased from 0.03% to 2.0% (P < .01). Minimally invasive surgery (OR, 1.59, P < .01), highest quartile annual hospital caseload (OR, 1.98, P = .01), and low hospital bed count (OR, 1.96, P = .03) were associated with SDD. Less than 20% of centers used SDD, although a select few hospitals discharged more than 50% of RPs the same day. Ambulatory ($63,060) and SDD ($63,332) RPs had lower total charges compared with inpatient RPs ($69,951). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that SDD was associated with a reduction in total charges (OR, 0.88, P < .01).

Conclusions: Over 50% of RPs are now performed as ambulatory or SDD encounters. SDD RP is more common in high-volume facilities with lower bed counts. Although our data suggest lower hospital charges, further study is warranted to evaluate the impact of SDD on readmission rates and direct patient costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
期刊最新文献
Disproportionality Analysis of Hypotension-Related Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Type 1a Selective Alpha Blockers in VigiBase. Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Warm, Cold, and No Ischemia Methods. Risks and Benefits of Caprini Score Recommended Thromboprophylaxis After Radical Prostatectomy and Nephrectomy. Trends in Outpatient Radical Prostatectomy and Same-Day Discharge for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample. Evidence-Based Framework for Surgical Irrigation Fluid Stewardship and Endoscopic Case Prioritization During Fluid Shortages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1