Nursing faculty readiness to teach online: a survey of nursing educators from Saudi Arabia and the UK.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02702-z
Mansour Mansour, Naim Abdulmohdi, Abd Alhadi Hasan, Hana Abu-Snieneh, Rani Shatnawi, Firas Taysir Abu-Sneineh, Sahar Elmetwally A Badawi
{"title":"Nursing faculty readiness to teach online: a survey of nursing educators from Saudi Arabia and the UK.","authors":"Mansour Mansour, Naim Abdulmohdi, Abd Alhadi Hasan, Hana Abu-Snieneh, Rani Shatnawi, Firas Taysir Abu-Sneineh, Sahar Elmetwally A Badawi","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02702-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing Faculty's readiness to teach online has been recognized as a critical prerequisite for effective online teaching.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the Nursing Faculty's level of readiness to teach online among a sample of nursing educators from Saudi Arabia and the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenient sample of 152 (46%) Nursing Faculty from five universities across Saudi Arabia and the UK completed Part 2 of The Faculty Readiness to Teach Online (FRTO)' survey between February - June 2021. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis One-Way Analysis of Variance tests were used to examine the differences in the average median scores of the participants' responses across selected independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nursing Faculty from Saudi Arabia universities have scored significantly higher Median score than their British counterparts on the Course Design subscale (z=-2.6, p = 0.01) and Time Management subscale (z=-4.403, p = 0.001), and Nursing Faculty who completed a training course before they can teach online have also scored significantly higher median score than those who didn't on the same two subscales respectively (X<sub>2</sub> = 6.15, df = 2, p = 0.05), (X<sub>2</sub> = 12, df = 2, p = 0.002). Female Nursing Faculty scored significantly higher median score than male Nursing Faculty on the Course Communication subscale (z=-2.73,p = 0.006). Moreover, Nursing Faculty who mostly used asynchronous online teaching significantly scored the highest median score on the technical subscale (X<sub>2</sub> = 8.64, df = 3, p = 0.03). The number of years of teaching online emerged as a key factor for defining the Nursing Faculty's level of readiness to teach online. For example, those Nursing Faculty with 6 years and longer of online teaching experience have scored significantly higher median scores on in Course Communication (X<sub>2</sub> = 23.4, df = 4, p = 0.00), Time Management (X<sub>2</sub> = 13.2, df = 4, p = 0.01) and Technical (X<sub>2</sub> = 10.13, df = 4, p = 0.008) subscales compared with those with less than 6 year of online teaching experience. Nursing Faculty across Saudi and British universities who teach on MSc program have scored significantly higher median scores than those who teach on other programs on all four subscales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Nursing Faculty expressed a high level of competency in teaching online, with significant variations based on socio-demographic parameters. Future research needs to examine the factors that shape the Nursing Faculty's readiness to teach online.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11796259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02702-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing Faculty's readiness to teach online has been recognized as a critical prerequisite for effective online teaching.

Aim: To examine the Nursing Faculty's level of readiness to teach online among a sample of nursing educators from Saudi Arabia and the UK.

Methods: A convenient sample of 152 (46%) Nursing Faculty from five universities across Saudi Arabia and the UK completed Part 2 of The Faculty Readiness to Teach Online (FRTO)' survey between February - June 2021. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis One-Way Analysis of Variance tests were used to examine the differences in the average median scores of the participants' responses across selected independent variables.

Results: Nursing Faculty from Saudi Arabia universities have scored significantly higher Median score than their British counterparts on the Course Design subscale (z=-2.6, p = 0.01) and Time Management subscale (z=-4.403, p = 0.001), and Nursing Faculty who completed a training course before they can teach online have also scored significantly higher median score than those who didn't on the same two subscales respectively (X2 = 6.15, df = 2, p = 0.05), (X2 = 12, df = 2, p = 0.002). Female Nursing Faculty scored significantly higher median score than male Nursing Faculty on the Course Communication subscale (z=-2.73,p = 0.006). Moreover, Nursing Faculty who mostly used asynchronous online teaching significantly scored the highest median score on the technical subscale (X2 = 8.64, df = 3, p = 0.03). The number of years of teaching online emerged as a key factor for defining the Nursing Faculty's level of readiness to teach online. For example, those Nursing Faculty with 6 years and longer of online teaching experience have scored significantly higher median scores on in Course Communication (X2 = 23.4, df = 4, p = 0.00), Time Management (X2 = 13.2, df = 4, p = 0.01) and Technical (X2 = 10.13, df = 4, p = 0.008) subscales compared with those with less than 6 year of online teaching experience. Nursing Faculty across Saudi and British universities who teach on MSc program have scored significantly higher median scores than those who teach on other programs on all four subscales.

Conclusion: The Nursing Faculty expressed a high level of competency in teaching online, with significant variations based on socio-demographic parameters. Future research needs to examine the factors that shape the Nursing Faculty's readiness to teach online.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理教师准备在线教学:对沙特阿拉伯和英国护理教育工作者的调查。
背景:护理学院在线教学的准备已被认为是有效在线教学的关键先决条件。目的:以来自沙特阿拉伯和英国的护理教育工作者为样本,研究护理学院在线教学的准备水平。方法:在2021年2月至6月期间,来自沙特阿拉伯和英国五所大学的152名(46%)护理学院的方便样本完成了教师在线教学准备(FRTO)调查的第二部分。使用Mann-Whitney U和Kruskal-Wallis的单向方差分析检验来检验参与者在选定的自变量之间的平均中位数得分的差异。结果:护理教师从沙特阿拉伯大学取得了平均得分显著高于他们的英国同行在课程设计内部氧化物(z = -2.6, p = 0.01)和时间管理内部氧化物(z = -4.403, p = 0.001),和护理教员完成在线培训课程才能教也得分显著高于平均得分比那些没有在相同的两个分量表(X2 = 6.15, df = 2, p = 0.05), (X2 = 12, df = 2, p = 0.002)。在课程沟通分量表中,女性护理学院的中位数得分显著高于男性护理学院(z=-2.73,p = 0.006)。以异步在线教学为主的护理学院在技术分量表中位数得分最高(X2 = 8.64, df = 3, p = 0.03)。在线教学的年数成为确定护理学院在线教学准备水平的关键因素。例如,具有6年及以上网络教学经验的护理学院在“课程沟通”(X2 = 23.4, df = 4, p = 0.00)、“时间管理”(X2 = 13.2, df = 4, p = 0.01)和“技术”(X2 = 10.13, df = 4, p = 0.008)三个分量表的中位数得分显著高于网络教学经验不足6年的护理学院。在沙特和英国的大学中,教授硕士课程的护理教师在所有四个分量表上的得分中位数都明显高于教授其他课程的护士。结论:护理学院表现出高水平的在线教学能力,基于社会人口参数的显著差异。未来的研究需要检查影响护理学院在线教学准备的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of ostracism among student nurses in Ghanaian hospitals: a descriptive qualitative study. A nurse-led program to improve immunosuppressant medication adherence in adult kidney transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial. Nursing managers' perceptions of clinical nurses' self-management in professional title promotion: a qualitative user persona study. Research on artificial intelligence literacy among nursing professionals: a scoping review. Challenges in educating nursing students on mechanical ventilation: the case for interactive mobile learning tools - a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1