Qualitative assessment of the view of academic honesty among freshmen in a physiology-based program.

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1152/advan.00109.2023
Emily Ryan, Lori Sherlock, Edward Ryan, Miriam Leary
{"title":"Qualitative assessment of the view of academic honesty among freshmen in a physiology-based program.","authors":"Emily Ryan, Lori Sherlock, Edward Ryan, Miriam Leary","doi":"10.1152/advan.00109.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Academic dishonesty is becoming more common in university students in STEM-based programs. This is concerning because these students hold positions of responsibility in their professional careers. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine if a student's academic standing and/or first-generation status would affect their views of academic integrity and dishonesty within their academic coursework. Freshmen completed reflections at the start and end of their first semester of college. Qualitative responses from their reflections were reviewed and organized into common themes. Students were grouped based upon university matriculation criteria (high school GPA, SAT and/or ACT scores and parental higher education status).The primary findings of the study demonstrated that the students responded similarly with their views of academic honesty, but some themes were more prevalent across the groups(First-Gen, Honors and Pre-Math). This study identified several areas to help STEM students in a physiology-based program gain a better understanding of academic integrity and dishonesty.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic dishonesty is becoming more common in university students in STEM-based programs. This is concerning because these students hold positions of responsibility in their professional careers. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine if a student's academic standing and/or first-generation status would affect their views of academic integrity and dishonesty within their academic coursework. Freshmen completed reflections at the start and end of their first semester of college. Qualitative responses from their reflections were reviewed and organized into common themes. Students were grouped based upon university matriculation criteria (high school GPA, SAT and/or ACT scores and parental higher education status).The primary findings of the study demonstrated that the students responded similarly with their views of academic honesty, but some themes were more prevalent across the groups(First-Gen, Honors and Pre-Math). This study identified several areas to help STEM students in a physiology-based program gain a better understanding of academic integrity and dishonesty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对生理学专业新生学术诚信观的定性评估。
在以科学、技术、工程和数学为基础的专业中,大学生学术不诚实的现象越来越普遍。这一点令人担忧,因为这些学生在他们的职业生涯中身负重任。本定性研究的目的是考察学生的学术地位和/或第一代身份是否会影响他们对学术诚信和学术课程中不诚实行为的看法。大一新生在大学第一学期开始和结束时完成了反思。我们对反思中的定性回答进行了审查,并将其整理为共同的主题。研究的主要结果表明,学生们对学术诚信的看法大同小异,但有些主题在各组(新生组、荣誉组和数学预科组)中更为普遍。这项研究确定了几个方面,以帮助以生理学为基础课程的 STEM 学生更好地理解学术诚信和不诚实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
期刊最新文献
How to get recognition for peer review? Talk less, listen more. Ultrasound technology as a tool to teach basic concepts of physiology and anatomy in undergraduate and graduate courses: a systematic review. A qualitative survey on perception of medical students on the use of large language models for educational purposes. Study while you sleep: using targeted memory reactivation as an independent research project for undergraduates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1