The outcomes of the 5 mm versus 11 mm primary trocar in gynecologic surgery - randomised study.

IF 1 Ginekologia polska Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.5603/gpl.100621
Emin Erhan Dönmez, Zafer Bütün, Eyüpcan Kardas, Fisun Vural
{"title":"The outcomes of the 5 mm versus 11 mm primary trocar in gynecologic surgery - randomised study.","authors":"Emin Erhan Dönmez, Zafer Bütün, Eyüpcan Kardas, Fisun Vural","doi":"10.5603/gpl.100621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the effects of using 11 mm trocar and 5 mm trocar as primary ports on postoperative pain in benign gynecological laparoscopic surgeries.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The patients were divided into two groups as the primary port, group I (5 mm trocar) and group II (11 mm trocar) by block randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 5 mm trocar group, postoperative pain score and need for analgesia were less in level I and level II operations. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the 5 mm trocar group. The postoperative pain score was higher in patients who had trocar insertion attempts 3 times with the direct trocar method compared to patients with 1 or 2 trocar entry attempts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a 5 mm laparoscope in benign gynecological operations is an advantageous method due to low postoperative pain score, analgesic requirement, and high patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":"496-502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.100621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effects of using 11 mm trocar and 5 mm trocar as primary ports on postoperative pain in benign gynecological laparoscopic surgeries.

Material and methods: The patients were divided into two groups as the primary port, group I (5 mm trocar) and group II (11 mm trocar) by block randomization.

Results: In the 5 mm trocar group, postoperative pain score and need for analgesia were less in level I and level II operations. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the 5 mm trocar group. The postoperative pain score was higher in patients who had trocar insertion attempts 3 times with the direct trocar method compared to patients with 1 or 2 trocar entry attempts.

Conclusions: The use of a 5 mm laparoscope in benign gynecological operations is an advantageous method due to low postoperative pain score, analgesic requirement, and high patient satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科手术中 5 毫米与 11 毫米主套管的对比结果--随机研究。
目的:比较11mm套管针与5mm套管针作为主孔对妇科腹腔镜良性手术术后疼痛的影响。材料与方法:采用分组随机法将患者分为ⅰ组(5 mm套管针)和ⅱ组(11 mm套管针),作为主孔。结果:5mm套管针组I级和II级手术术后疼痛评分和镇痛需求均较低。5mm套管针组患者满意度明显提高。使用直接套管针置入3次的患者术后疼痛评分高于1次或2次置入套管针的患者。结论:5mm腹腔镜在妇科良性手术中应用,术后疼痛评分低,镇痛需求大,患者满意度高,是一种有利的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of implementing HPV vaccination in Turkiye's National Immunization Program using the PRIME model. Effect of circadian rhythm on doppler parameters ın patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Beyond growing teratoma syndrome: post-treatment manifestations and diagnostic challenges following ovarian immature teratoma. The relationship between HPV persistence and vaginal microbiotas in high risk-human papillomavirus positive patients. A case of a patient with a utero-subcutaneous fistula and abdominal wall endometriosis after myomectomy - diagnosis and treatment of an extremely rare complication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1