A Comprehensive, Home-Based, Fall Prevention Initiative: Preliminary Data From the Raise'Age Program.

Amal Aïdoud, Jaques-Alexis Nkodo, Wassim Gana, Camille Debacq, Natacha Michel, Pierre Deneau, Calyssa Trézy, Nicolas Guyot, Matthieu Coulongeat, Bertrand Fougère
{"title":"A Comprehensive, Home-Based, Fall Prevention Initiative: Preliminary Data From the Raise'Age Program.","authors":"Amal Aïdoud, Jaques-Alexis Nkodo, Wassim Gana, Camille Debacq, Natacha Michel, Pierre Deneau, Calyssa Trézy, Nicolas Guyot, Matthieu Coulongeat, Bertrand Fougère","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although falls among older adults pose substantial health risks and are often preventable, many fallers do not seek medical care. The Raise'Age program addresses this challenge by offering proactive fall prevention for older adults who require \"lift assistance\" but are not taken to hospital. The program includes (i) screening by emergency medical services (EMSs), (ii) referrals for a comprehensive geriatric assessment, (iii) in-home evaluations by a mobile geriatric team (MGT), and (iv) referrals to primary care physicians (PCPs). Here, we outline the program's design, development, and implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The program's activity in 2023 was assessed with regard to the number of EMS fall reports, the reports' completeness, the program's eligibility, and acceptance by physicians and patients, in-home assessments, adherence to geriatric follow-up programs, and coordination delays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2023, the Raise'Age program received 959 reports, accounting for 48% of lift assistances by paramedics. Of these, 37% of the reports were reviewed for eligibility. Reports were often archived due to irrelevance, a recent hospital stay, or difficulty contacting PCPs. Among eligible reports, 77% were approved for in-home evaluations, and the remainder were referred to a geriatrician or scheduled for hospital admission. The median processing time was 26 days. Of 228 patients eligible for home visits, 150 accepted the intervention. Visit acceptance rates were higher when a PCP endorsed the program. Follow-up was provided to 36% of the patients- primarily via teleconsultation. Finally, 15.6% of the patients for whom a lift assistance report was sent to the MGT completed the Raise'Age program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Raise'Age program demonstrates that EMS screening and collaboration with MGTs are feasible, although some patients may decline the services offered. Continuous evaluations and interventions by MGTs and referrals to community-based medical and social services effectively address the needs of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although falls among older adults pose substantial health risks and are often preventable, many fallers do not seek medical care. The Raise'Age program addresses this challenge by offering proactive fall prevention for older adults who require "lift assistance" but are not taken to hospital. The program includes (i) screening by emergency medical services (EMSs), (ii) referrals for a comprehensive geriatric assessment, (iii) in-home evaluations by a mobile geriatric team (MGT), and (iv) referrals to primary care physicians (PCPs). Here, we outline the program's design, development, and implementation.

Methods: The program's activity in 2023 was assessed with regard to the number of EMS fall reports, the reports' completeness, the program's eligibility, and acceptance by physicians and patients, in-home assessments, adherence to geriatric follow-up programs, and coordination delays.

Results: In 2023, the Raise'Age program received 959 reports, accounting for 48% of lift assistances by paramedics. Of these, 37% of the reports were reviewed for eligibility. Reports were often archived due to irrelevance, a recent hospital stay, or difficulty contacting PCPs. Among eligible reports, 77% were approved for in-home evaluations, and the remainder were referred to a geriatrician or scheduled for hospital admission. The median processing time was 26 days. Of 228 patients eligible for home visits, 150 accepted the intervention. Visit acceptance rates were higher when a PCP endorsed the program. Follow-up was provided to 36% of the patients- primarily via teleconsultation. Finally, 15.6% of the patients for whom a lift assistance report was sent to the MGT completed the Raise'Age program.

Conclusions: The Raise'Age program demonstrates that EMS screening and collaboration with MGTs are feasible, although some patients may decline the services offered. Continuous evaluations and interventions by MGTs and referrals to community-based medical and social services effectively address the needs of older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以家庭为基础的综合预防跌倒计划:提高年龄计划的初步数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Home-Based Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Community-Dwelling, At-Risk, Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Individualized Net Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in SPRINT. Inspiring Undergraduate Student Training in Alzheimer's Research (USTAR): Training the Next Generation of Aging Scientists. The Halo Effect: Perceptions of Information Privacy Among Healthcare Chatbot Users. Trust in Physicians and End-of-Life Discussions and Preferences for Place of Care Among US Chinese Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1