Trends in incidence, metastasis, and mortality from thyroid cancer in the USA from 1975 to 2019: a population-based study of age, period, and cohort effects

IF 41.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00310-3
Michelle M Chen, Michael Luu, Wendy L Sacks, Lisa Orloff, Lauren P Wallner, Jon Mallen-St Clair, Susan C Pitt, Allen S Ho, Zachary S Zumsteg
{"title":"Trends in incidence, metastasis, and mortality from thyroid cancer in the USA from 1975 to 2019: a population-based study of age, period, and cohort effects","authors":"Michelle M Chen, Michael Luu, Wendy L Sacks, Lisa Orloff, Lauren P Wallner, Jon Mallen-St Clair, Susan C Pitt, Allen S Ho, Zachary S Zumsteg","doi":"10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00310-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>In the USA, the incidence of thyroid cancer increased rapidly for several decades, although some studies have suggested that it has now plateaued or even begun to decrease. We aimed to establish whether incidence in the USA has truly decreased or merely plateaued, and to understand some of the underlying factors driving these changes.<h3>Methods</h3>We conducted a retrospective, population-based study using the National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the National Center for Health Statistics database. We used incidence data from these registries obtained between 1975 and 2019, including patients with a diagnosis of thyroid cancer according to the third edition ICD for Oncology (site code C73.9) and malignant histology. We used the NCI's Joinpoint Regression Program to estimate trends in the incidence over time and age-period-cohort modelling to identify the factors influencing these trends.<h3>Findings</h3>Our sample included 91 968 patients with thyroid cancer, of whom 23 467 (25·5%) were men and 68 501 (74·5%) were women. The annual incidence of thyroid cancer increased from 5·0 cases per 100 000 people in 1975 to 14·6 cases per 100 000 people in 2009, before plateauing until 2019. The age-period-cohort analysis suggests that the changes in incidence were primarily due to time period effects. Furthermore, the increase in incidence was most prominent among women aged 40–69 years and men aged 50–79 years. Throughout all time periods, incidence increased with each successive birth cohort among both women and men.<h3>Interpretation</h3>The rise and subsequent plateau in the incidence of thyroid cancer in the USA have been primarily driven by time period effects, likely due to changing patterns in diagnostic pressure. Variations in the incidence of thyroid cancer by age, which increased during the time frame of this study, seem to be driven predominantly by overdiagnosis. Although the incidence of thyroid cancer has plateaued, it remains at peak levels, suggesting that overdiagnosis remains a crucial unresolved public health issue. Further work is needed to help limit the current drivers of overdiagnosis and to implement novel solutions aimed at both physicians, patients, and policy makers.<h3>Funding</h3>None.","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":41.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00310-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the USA, the incidence of thyroid cancer increased rapidly for several decades, although some studies have suggested that it has now plateaued or even begun to decrease. We aimed to establish whether incidence in the USA has truly decreased or merely plateaued, and to understand some of the underlying factors driving these changes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, population-based study using the National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the National Center for Health Statistics database. We used incidence data from these registries obtained between 1975 and 2019, including patients with a diagnosis of thyroid cancer according to the third edition ICD for Oncology (site code C73.9) and malignant histology. We used the NCI's Joinpoint Regression Program to estimate trends in the incidence over time and age-period-cohort modelling to identify the factors influencing these trends.

Findings

Our sample included 91 968 patients with thyroid cancer, of whom 23 467 (25·5%) were men and 68 501 (74·5%) were women. The annual incidence of thyroid cancer increased from 5·0 cases per 100 000 people in 1975 to 14·6 cases per 100 000 people in 2009, before plateauing until 2019. The age-period-cohort analysis suggests that the changes in incidence were primarily due to time period effects. Furthermore, the increase in incidence was most prominent among women aged 40–69 years and men aged 50–79 years. Throughout all time periods, incidence increased with each successive birth cohort among both women and men.

Interpretation

The rise and subsequent plateau in the incidence of thyroid cancer in the USA have been primarily driven by time period effects, likely due to changing patterns in diagnostic pressure. Variations in the incidence of thyroid cancer by age, which increased during the time frame of this study, seem to be driven predominantly by overdiagnosis. Although the incidence of thyroid cancer has plateaued, it remains at peak levels, suggesting that overdiagnosis remains a crucial unresolved public health issue. Further work is needed to help limit the current drivers of overdiagnosis and to implement novel solutions aimed at both physicians, patients, and policy makers.

Funding

None.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1975年至2019年美国甲状腺癌发病率、转移和死亡率的趋势:一项基于人群的年龄、时期和队列效应研究
在美国,几十年来甲状腺癌的发病率迅速上升,尽管一些研究表明它现在已经趋于平稳甚至开始下降。我们的目的是确定美国的发病率是真的下降了还是仅仅处于稳定状态,并了解导致这些变化的一些潜在因素。方法:我们使用美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)的监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库以及美国国家卫生统计中心的数据库进行了一项回顾性的、基于人群的研究。我们使用了1975年至2019年期间从这些登记处获得的发病率数据,包括根据第三版肿瘤学ICD(站点代码C73.9)和恶性组织学诊断为甲状腺癌的患者。我们使用NCI的连接点回归程序来估计发病率随时间的趋势,并使用年龄-时期-队列模型来确定影响这些趋势的因素。结果:纳入91 968例甲状腺癌患者,其中男性23 467例(25.5%),女性68 501例(74.5%)。甲状腺癌的年发病率从1975年的每10万人5.0例增加到2009年的每10万人14.6例,然后一直稳定到2019年。年龄-时期-队列分析表明,发病率的变化主要是由于时间段的影响。此外,发病率的增加在40-69岁的女性和50-79岁的男性中最为显著。在所有时期,发病率随着每一个连续的出生队列在女性和男性中增加。在美国,甲状腺癌发病率的上升和随后的平稳期主要是由时间段效应驱动的,可能是由于诊断压力模式的变化。甲状腺癌发病率随年龄的变化,在本研究的时间框架内增加,似乎主要是由过度诊断驱动的。虽然甲状腺癌的发病率已趋于稳定,但仍处于高峰水平,这表明过度诊断仍然是一个关键的未解决的公共卫生问题。需要进一步的工作来帮助限制目前过度诊断的驱动因素,并实施针对医生、患者和政策制定者的新解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
61.50
自引率
1.60%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, an independent journal with a global perspective and strong clinical focus, features original clinical research, expert reviews, news, and opinion pieces in each monthly issue. Covering topics like diabetes, obesity, nutrition, and more, the journal provides insights into clinical advances and practice-changing research worldwide. It welcomes original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice, as well as informative reviews on related topics, especially those with global health importance and relevance to low-income and middle-income countries. The journal publishes various content types, including Articles, Reviews, Comments, Correspondence, Health Policy, and Personal Views, along with Series and Commissions aiming to drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in diabetes and endocrinology.
期刊最新文献
A new dawn for osteoporosis drug development Circadian and sleep medicine: challenges and future directions for metabolic and endocrine research. Aligning diabetes surveillance with clinical reality. 3 months vs 12 months of romosozumab for postmenopausal osteoporosis (LIDA): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial 3 months of romosozumab: a pragmatic clinical solution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1