A pilot randomized controlled study of integrated kidney palliative care and chronic kidney disease care implemented in a safety-net hospital: Protocol for a pilot study of feasibility of a randomized controlled trial

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101439
Jennifer S. Scherer , Wenbo Wu , Chen Lyu , Keith S. Goldfeld , Abraham A. Brody , Joshua Chodosh , David Charytan
{"title":"A pilot randomized controlled study of integrated kidney palliative care and chronic kidney disease care implemented in a safety-net hospital: Protocol for a pilot study of feasibility of a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Jennifer S. Scherer ,&nbsp;Wenbo Wu ,&nbsp;Chen Lyu ,&nbsp;Keith S. Goldfeld ,&nbsp;Abraham A. Brody ,&nbsp;Joshua Chodosh ,&nbsp;David Charytan","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts more than 800 million people. It causes significant suffering and disproportionately impacts marginalized populations in the United States. Kidney palliative care has the potential to alleviate this distress, but has not been tested. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of integrated kidney palliative and CKD care in an urban safety-net hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single-site pilot RCT designed to enroll 85 participants, with a goal of at least 60 completing the study. The inclusion criteria are adults 18 or older, who are either Spanish or English speakers, have an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) of ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and are receiving care at our safety net hospital. Participants will be randomized in permuted blocks of two or four to either the intervention group, who will receive monthly ambulatory care visits for six months with a palliative care provider trained in kidney palliative care, or to usual nephrology care. Primary outcomes are feasibility of recruitment, retention, fidelity to the study visit protocol, and the ability to collect outcome data. These outcomes include symptom burden, quality of life, and engagement in advance care planning.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This pilot RCT will provide essential data on the feasibility of testing integrated palliative care in CKD care in an underserved setting. These outcomes will inform a larger, fully powered trial that tests the efficacy of our kidney palliative care approach.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>NCT04998110.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 101439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts more than 800 million people. It causes significant suffering and disproportionately impacts marginalized populations in the United States. Kidney palliative care has the potential to alleviate this distress, but has not been tested. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of integrated kidney palliative and CKD care in an urban safety-net hospital.

Methods

This is a single-site pilot RCT designed to enroll 85 participants, with a goal of at least 60 completing the study. The inclusion criteria are adults 18 or older, who are either Spanish or English speakers, have an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) of ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and are receiving care at our safety net hospital. Participants will be randomized in permuted blocks of two or four to either the intervention group, who will receive monthly ambulatory care visits for six months with a palliative care provider trained in kidney palliative care, or to usual nephrology care. Primary outcomes are feasibility of recruitment, retention, fidelity to the study visit protocol, and the ability to collect outcome data. These outcomes include symptom burden, quality of life, and engagement in advance care planning.

Discussion

This pilot RCT will provide essential data on the feasibility of testing integrated palliative care in CKD care in an underserved setting. These outcomes will inform a larger, fully powered trial that tests the efficacy of our kidney palliative care approach.

Clinical trial registration

NCT04998110.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项在安全网医院实施的综合肾脏姑息治疗和慢性肾脏疾病治疗的试点随机对照研究:一项随机对照试验可行性的试点研究方案
背景:慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)影响着超过8亿人。它给美国的边缘人群带来了巨大的痛苦和不成比例的影响。肾脏姑息治疗有可能减轻这种痛苦,但尚未经过测试。本初步研究评估了一项随机临床试验(RCT)的可行性,该试验测试了城市安全网医院综合肾脏姑息治疗和CKD治疗的疗效。方法:这是一项单站点试点随机对照试验,设计入组85名参与者,目标是至少60人完成研究。纳入标准为18岁或以上的成年人,说西班牙语或英语,肾小球滤过率(eGFR)估计≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2,并在我们的安全网医院接受治疗。参与者将被随机分为两组或四组,干预组将接受为期六个月的每月流动护理访问,由接受过肾脏姑息治疗培训的姑息治疗提供者进行,或接受常规肾内科护理。主要结果包括招募的可行性、保留、对研究访问方案的忠实度以及收集结果数据的能力。这些结果包括症状负担、生活质量和参与预先护理计划。该试点随机对照试验将为在服务不足的地区测试综合姑息治疗CKD护理的可行性提供必要的数据。这些结果将为一个更大的、全动力的试验提供信息,以测试我们的肾脏姑息治疗方法的有效性。临床试验注册号nct04998110。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
期刊最新文献
(Cost-)Effectiveness of personalised multimodal physiotherapy compared to surgery in patients with painful cervical radiculopathy. Protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial (The MOVE-IT study) Relaxation effects of Shikuwasa (Citrus depressa Hayata) essential oil inhalation: A randomized controlled trial in young adult females Designing communication strategies to increase rural participation in clinical trials using the Health Belief Model and strategic communication Adjusting for intercurrent events using Bayesian joint models for longitudinal outcomes in clinical trials The efficacy of home-based virtual reality exposure therapy as an add-on to behavioral therapy for children with selective mutism: Protocol for a single-case experimental design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1