A modified A* algorithm for path planning in the radioactive environment of nuclear facilities

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Annals of Nuclear Energy Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111233
Biao Zhang , Xingfu Cai , Guoqiang Li , Xiaomeng Li , Minjun Peng , Miao Yang
{"title":"A modified A* algorithm for path planning in the radioactive environment of nuclear facilities","authors":"Biao Zhang ,&nbsp;Xingfu Cai ,&nbsp;Guoqiang Li ,&nbsp;Xiaomeng Li ,&nbsp;Minjun Peng ,&nbsp;Miao Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The search efficiency is low when using the traditional A* algorithm for radiation field path planning. In order to prevent the situation where one of the two cost functions of <em>F</em>(<em>n</em>) in the A* algorithm is significantly larger than the other, this paper presents a predicted cost method as a heuristic function of the A* algorithm and creates a weighting scheme to balance the actual and predicted costs in the A* algorithm. The results of path planning show that the modified A* algorithm has a search direction, which increases algorithm efficiency while guaranteeing low dose. The total cumulative dose of the route of the modified A* algorithm is better than that of the traditional A* algorithm and probabilistic road map method(PRM). The calculation results of the two models show that the modified A* algorithm is slightly lower than the traditional A* algorithm in terms of cumulative dose, which is reduced by 5.35% compared with the PRM algorithm. In terms of the number of algorithm execution points, the modified A* algorithm is 57.18% lower than the traditional A* algorithm on average. In terms of calculation time, the modified A* algorithm is 13.79% shorter than the traditional A* algorithm. The PRM algorithm has the shortest time, but the results of the PRM algorithm are random and unstable. The modified A* algorithm has the search direction under the premise of keeping the low dose, which improves the efficiency of the algorithm. Therefore, the modified A* algorithm can be used as an effective reference for staff path planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 111233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925000507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The search efficiency is low when using the traditional A* algorithm for radiation field path planning. In order to prevent the situation where one of the two cost functions of F(n) in the A* algorithm is significantly larger than the other, this paper presents a predicted cost method as a heuristic function of the A* algorithm and creates a weighting scheme to balance the actual and predicted costs in the A* algorithm. The results of path planning show that the modified A* algorithm has a search direction, which increases algorithm efficiency while guaranteeing low dose. The total cumulative dose of the route of the modified A* algorithm is better than that of the traditional A* algorithm and probabilistic road map method(PRM). The calculation results of the two models show that the modified A* algorithm is slightly lower than the traditional A* algorithm in terms of cumulative dose, which is reduced by 5.35% compared with the PRM algorithm. In terms of the number of algorithm execution points, the modified A* algorithm is 57.18% lower than the traditional A* algorithm on average. In terms of calculation time, the modified A* algorithm is 13.79% shorter than the traditional A* algorithm. The PRM algorithm has the shortest time, but the results of the PRM algorithm are random and unstable. The modified A* algorithm has the search direction under the premise of keeping the low dose, which improves the efficiency of the algorithm. Therefore, the modified A* algorithm can be used as an effective reference for staff path planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Annals of Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
21.10%
发文量
632
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Optimization of core design to achieve ultra-long core life in alternative ways for modular gas cooled fast reactor Utilization of NEUP Data for HTGR Thermal-Fluid Code Validation: A New Resource Platform Core-wide multi-physics simulation of fuel behaviour during large-break LOCA using NEXUS Optical and spectral features of new Borax/ Li2O glass systems and calculation of radiation shielding attenuation parameters Advanced full-core modeling of fission product release in pebble-bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1