Nasal valve angle or nasal valve groove: Which is more suitable to describe a normal anatomic structure?

Baofu Yu, Chuanchang Dai, Jiao Wei
{"title":"Nasal valve angle or nasal valve groove: Which is more suitable to describe a normal anatomic structure?","authors":"Baofu Yu,&nbsp;Chuanchang Dai,&nbsp;Jiao Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.cjprs.2023.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The size of the nasal valve angle is often used to assess nasal ventilation. A larger angle of the nasal valve is believed to be more conducive for ventilation, and a small angle is considered unfavorable. However, in more than 30 years of clinical practice, we have experienced that some patients with a normal nasal valve angle have relatively severe subjective or objective nasal ventilation obstruction. By studying the computed tomography data of these patients, we found that the tips of their nasal valves were at a sharp angle, while those of healthy individuals were in an arc shape. A sharp angle at the tip of the nasal valve, therefore, is a risk factor for obstructed nasal ventilation. Herein, we propose that the term “nasal valve groove” may be a more appropriate descriptor for the normal internal nasal valve anatomy, and we hope that more rhinoplasty surgeons will pay attention to how the shape of the tip affects nasal ventilation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":65600,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 221-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691123000663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The size of the nasal valve angle is often used to assess nasal ventilation. A larger angle of the nasal valve is believed to be more conducive for ventilation, and a small angle is considered unfavorable. However, in more than 30 years of clinical practice, we have experienced that some patients with a normal nasal valve angle have relatively severe subjective or objective nasal ventilation obstruction. By studying the computed tomography data of these patients, we found that the tips of their nasal valves were at a sharp angle, while those of healthy individuals were in an arc shape. A sharp angle at the tip of the nasal valve, therefore, is a risk factor for obstructed nasal ventilation. Herein, we propose that the term “nasal valve groove” may be a more appropriate descriptor for the normal internal nasal valve anatomy, and we hope that more rhinoplasty surgeons will pay attention to how the shape of the tip affects nasal ventilation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Pathology and Medical Technology, Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
New frontiers in scar management: Adipose tissue transplantation techniques Inferior alveolar nerve injury after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: A literature review Acute traumatic extratemporal facial nerve injury: A 5-year review Biodegradable membrane for lower eyelid reconstruction: Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction Impact of negative pressure wound therapy on inflammatory cell counts in porcine deep dermal burn wound models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1