Understanding the experiences of people who have Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) and the health professionals who care for them: A grounded theory study

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104986
H. Eftekhari , G. Pearce , S. Staniszewska , K. Seers
{"title":"Understanding the experiences of people who have Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) and the health professionals who care for them: A grounded theory study","authors":"H. Eftekhari ,&nbsp;G. Pearce ,&nbsp;S. Staniszewska ,&nbsp;K. Seers","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the experiences of people who have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and the health professionals who care for them: a grounded theory study.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is an under recognised, predominantly female condition. Awareness of this condition has increased due its association with Long-COVID. Understanding experiences informs areas for future study. Research into the experience of POTS is emerging, with no currently published studies including the experiences of health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to understand experiences of POTS, its challenges, and aspects of care from the perspectives of people with the condition and health professionals who look after them.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A grounded theory approach was taken to develop a conceptual framework of the experience of POTS conceptualised through a critical realist lens.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>This United Kingdom based study included people with POTS from three national health care centres and a diverse range of health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Theoretical and purposive sampling recruited people with POTS, and snowball sampling recruited health professionals through a United Kingdom charity and arrhythmia nursing network. Health professionals were interviewed from a range of professions including nurses, secondary care consultants, primary care general practitioners, psychologists, physiotherapists, and an occupational therapist.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Between September 2021 and September 2022 in-depth online semi-structured interviews were undertaken. Data were thematically analysed. Corbin and Strauss' Grounded Theory methods of constant comparison, memos, and a reflexive journal were used. Analysis moved from first open coding of health professional themes to more focused axial coding, data, and category linking. The study patient and public involvement group informed thematic development and theoretical sampling. The final themes were conceptualised through the critical realism's three layers of experience.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-four participants were included, 19 people with POTS and 25 health professionals. Three core themes were found: 1) A challenging condition, 2) POTS healthcare provision - services by accident not design, and 3) The need to validate experiences. Health professionals experienced challenges in their clinical self-efficacy. POTS care was driven by individual human agency and interpersonal relationships. People with POTS took individual responsibility for their self-management but were impacted by gender inequalities, a medical model prioritising guidelines, and a poor evidence-base.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first qualitative study to explore both people with POTS and health professional experiences of looking after people with this condition. Findings identified: 1) a need for empowering both people with POTS and health professionals through shared care and decision making, 2) the requirement for a system wide recognition of POTS to move the landscape away from one of individual responsibility, and 3) the need to develop the evidence-base.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>Health Research Authority (IRAS: 281284). First recruitment: 13/09/2021.</div><div><strong>Tweetable abstract</strong>: Understanding the experiences of people with POTS and the health professionals who see them. The findings of 44 in-depth interviews.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104986"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002992","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the experiences of people who have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and the health professionals who care for them: a grounded theory study.

Background

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is an under recognised, predominantly female condition. Awareness of this condition has increased due its association with Long-COVID. Understanding experiences informs areas for future study. Research into the experience of POTS is emerging, with no currently published studies including the experiences of health professionals.

Aim

This study aimed to understand experiences of POTS, its challenges, and aspects of care from the perspectives of people with the condition and health professionals who look after them.

Design

A grounded theory approach was taken to develop a conceptual framework of the experience of POTS conceptualised through a critical realist lens.

Setting

This United Kingdom based study included people with POTS from three national health care centres and a diverse range of health professionals.

Participants

Theoretical and purposive sampling recruited people with POTS, and snowball sampling recruited health professionals through a United Kingdom charity and arrhythmia nursing network. Health professionals were interviewed from a range of professions including nurses, secondary care consultants, primary care general practitioners, psychologists, physiotherapists, and an occupational therapist.

Method

Between September 2021 and September 2022 in-depth online semi-structured interviews were undertaken. Data were thematically analysed. Corbin and Strauss' Grounded Theory methods of constant comparison, memos, and a reflexive journal were used. Analysis moved from first open coding of health professional themes to more focused axial coding, data, and category linking. The study patient and public involvement group informed thematic development and theoretical sampling. The final themes were conceptualised through the critical realism's three layers of experience.

Results

Forty-four participants were included, 19 people with POTS and 25 health professionals. Three core themes were found: 1) A challenging condition, 2) POTS healthcare provision - services by accident not design, and 3) The need to validate experiences. Health professionals experienced challenges in their clinical self-efficacy. POTS care was driven by individual human agency and interpersonal relationships. People with POTS took individual responsibility for their self-management but were impacted by gender inequalities, a medical model prioritising guidelines, and a poor evidence-base.

Conclusion

This is the first qualitative study to explore both people with POTS and health professional experiences of looking after people with this condition. Findings identified: 1) a need for empowering both people with POTS and health professionals through shared care and decision making, 2) the requirement for a system wide recognition of POTS to move the landscape away from one of individual responsibility, and 3) the need to develop the evidence-base.

Registration

Health Research Authority (IRAS: 281284). First recruitment: 13/09/2021.
Tweetable abstract: Understanding the experiences of people with POTS and the health professionals who see them. The findings of 44 in-depth interviews.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解体位性心动过速综合征(POTS)患者和护理他们的卫生专业人员的经历:一项有根据的理论研究
了解体位性心动过速综合征(POTS)患者和护理他们的卫生专业人员的经历:一项有根据的理论研究。背景:体位性站立性心动过速综合征(POTS)是一种未被充分认识的、以女性为主的疾病。由于与长冠状病毒相关,人们对这种疾病的认识有所提高。了解经验可以为未来的研究领域提供信息。对POTS经验的研究正在兴起,目前尚未发表包括卫生专业人员经验在内的研究。目的本研究旨在从患者和照顾他们的卫生专业人员的角度了解POTS的经历,其挑战和护理方面。设计采用了一种扎根理论的方法,通过批判现实主义的视角,对POTS的经验进行概念化。这项以英国为基础的研究包括来自三个国家卫生保健中心的POTS患者和各种卫生专业人员。参与者:理论抽样和目的抽样招募了POTS患者,滚雪球抽样通过英国慈善机构和心律失常护理网络招募了卫生专业人员。受访的卫生专业人员来自不同的行业,包括护士、二级保健顾问、初级保健全科医生、心理学家、物理治疗师和职业治疗师。方法于2021年9月至2022年9月进行深度在线半结构化访谈。对数据进行主题分析。使用了柯宾和施特劳斯的不断比较、备忘录和反思性日记的扎根理论方法。分析从最初对卫生专业主题的开放式编码转向更集中的轴向编码、数据和类别链接。研究患者和公众参与小组为专题发展和理论抽样提供了信息。最后的主题是通过批判现实主义的三个层次的经验概念化。结果共纳入研究对象44人,其中POTS患者19人,卫生专业人员25人。发现了三个核心主题:1)具有挑战性的条件,2)POTS医疗保健提供-意外而非设计的服务,以及3)验证经验的必要性。卫生专业人员在临床自我效能方面面临挑战。POTS护理是由个人能动性和人际关系驱动的。患有POTS的人对自己的自我管理负有个人责任,但受到性别不平等、优先考虑指导方针的医疗模式和缺乏证据基础的影响。结论本研究首次对POTS患者进行了定性研究,并探讨了护理此类患者的卫生专业经验。确定的调查结果有:1)需要通过共同护理和决策来增强POTS患者和卫生专业人员的权能;2)需要在系统范围内广泛承认POTS,以使人们不再承担个人责任;3)需要发展证据基础。注册卫生研究管理局(IRAS: 281284)。首次招聘:2021年9月13日。推特摘要:了解POTS患者的经历和看到他们的卫生专业人员。44个深度访谈的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
期刊最新文献
New graduate nurses' early-career trajectories in South Korea: A 3-year longitudinal qualitative study Understanding end-of-life injectable medication patient safety origin incidents in the community: a mixed-methods analysis of national incident-reporting data Effects of pickleball on pre-frailty, physical fitness, 24-hour movement behaviors, and quality of life in older adults: A randomized controlled trial The career choices of nursing students after the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review Preferences for palliative care services for patients with advanced cancer from the demand-supply perspective: A multicenter discrete choice experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1