Understanding the experiences of people who have Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) and the health professionals who care for them: A grounded theory study

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104986
H. Eftekhari , G. Pearce , S. Staniszewska , K. Seers
{"title":"Understanding the experiences of people who have Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) and the health professionals who care for them: A grounded theory study","authors":"H. Eftekhari ,&nbsp;G. Pearce ,&nbsp;S. Staniszewska ,&nbsp;K. Seers","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the experiences of people who have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and the health professionals who care for them: a grounded theory study.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is an under recognised, predominantly female condition. Awareness of this condition has increased due its association with Long-COVID. Understanding experiences informs areas for future study. Research into the experience of POTS is emerging, with no currently published studies including the experiences of health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to understand experiences of POTS, its challenges, and aspects of care from the perspectives of people with the condition and health professionals who look after them.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A grounded theory approach was taken to develop a conceptual framework of the experience of POTS conceptualised through a critical realist lens.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>This United Kingdom based study included people with POTS from three national health care centres and a diverse range of health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Theoretical and purposive sampling recruited people with POTS, and snowball sampling recruited health professionals through a United Kingdom charity and arrhythmia nursing network. Health professionals were interviewed from a range of professions including nurses, secondary care consultants, primary care general practitioners, psychologists, physiotherapists, and an occupational therapist.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Between September 2021 and September 2022 in-depth online semi-structured interviews were undertaken. Data were thematically analysed. Corbin and Strauss' Grounded Theory methods of constant comparison, memos, and a reflexive journal were used. Analysis moved from first open coding of health professional themes to more focused axial coding, data, and category linking. The study patient and public involvement group informed thematic development and theoretical sampling. The final themes were conceptualised through the critical realism's three layers of experience.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-four participants were included, 19 people with POTS and 25 health professionals. Three core themes were found: 1) A challenging condition, 2) POTS healthcare provision - services by accident not design, and 3) The need to validate experiences. Health professionals experienced challenges in their clinical self-efficacy. POTS care was driven by individual human agency and interpersonal relationships. People with POTS took individual responsibility for their self-management but were impacted by gender inequalities, a medical model prioritising guidelines, and a poor evidence-base.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first qualitative study to explore both people with POTS and health professional experiences of looking after people with this condition. Findings identified: 1) a need for empowering both people with POTS and health professionals through shared care and decision making, 2) the requirement for a system wide recognition of POTS to move the landscape away from one of individual responsibility, and 3) the need to develop the evidence-base.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>Health Research Authority (IRAS: 281284). First recruitment: 13/09/2021.</div><div><strong>Tweetable abstract</strong>: Understanding the experiences of people with POTS and the health professionals who see them. The findings of 44 in-depth interviews.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104986"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002992","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the experiences of people who have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and the health professionals who care for them: a grounded theory study.

Background

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is an under recognised, predominantly female condition. Awareness of this condition has increased due its association with Long-COVID. Understanding experiences informs areas for future study. Research into the experience of POTS is emerging, with no currently published studies including the experiences of health professionals.

Aim

This study aimed to understand experiences of POTS, its challenges, and aspects of care from the perspectives of people with the condition and health professionals who look after them.

Design

A grounded theory approach was taken to develop a conceptual framework of the experience of POTS conceptualised through a critical realist lens.

Setting

This United Kingdom based study included people with POTS from three national health care centres and a diverse range of health professionals.

Participants

Theoretical and purposive sampling recruited people with POTS, and snowball sampling recruited health professionals through a United Kingdom charity and arrhythmia nursing network. Health professionals were interviewed from a range of professions including nurses, secondary care consultants, primary care general practitioners, psychologists, physiotherapists, and an occupational therapist.

Method

Between September 2021 and September 2022 in-depth online semi-structured interviews were undertaken. Data were thematically analysed. Corbin and Strauss' Grounded Theory methods of constant comparison, memos, and a reflexive journal were used. Analysis moved from first open coding of health professional themes to more focused axial coding, data, and category linking. The study patient and public involvement group informed thematic development and theoretical sampling. The final themes were conceptualised through the critical realism's three layers of experience.

Results

Forty-four participants were included, 19 people with POTS and 25 health professionals. Three core themes were found: 1) A challenging condition, 2) POTS healthcare provision - services by accident not design, and 3) The need to validate experiences. Health professionals experienced challenges in their clinical self-efficacy. POTS care was driven by individual human agency and interpersonal relationships. People with POTS took individual responsibility for their self-management but were impacted by gender inequalities, a medical model prioritising guidelines, and a poor evidence-base.

Conclusion

This is the first qualitative study to explore both people with POTS and health professional experiences of looking after people with this condition. Findings identified: 1) a need for empowering both people with POTS and health professionals through shared care and decision making, 2) the requirement for a system wide recognition of POTS to move the landscape away from one of individual responsibility, and 3) the need to develop the evidence-base.

Registration

Health Research Authority (IRAS: 281284). First recruitment: 13/09/2021.
Tweetable abstract: Understanding the experiences of people with POTS and the health professionals who see them. The findings of 44 in-depth interviews.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
期刊最新文献
Effect of zero-time exercise on physically inactive adults with insomnia disorder: A randomized controlled trial Editorial Board Comment on Raya-Benítez et al. (2025) ‘Effectiveness of non-instrumental early mobilization to reduce the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients’ What makes a local accreditation programme successful and how? A rapid realist review and in-depth consultation with senior nursing leaders Effectiveness of the nurse-led multi-component BRIDGE program on maternal competence and selected post-discharge outcomes of preterm babies: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1