First-Line Levofloxacin-Based Triple Therapy Versus Standard Bismuth-Based Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70432
Abdulrhman Khaled Al Abdulqader, Turki Abdullah Alamri, Mahdi Abdullah Alhamad, Somaia Shehab El-Deen, Abdallah Essa, Raed Abdullah Alfayez, Baqer Mohammed Albaqshi, Adnan Salah Almajed, Mohammed Yousef Alhassan, Ali Essa, Ahmed Abdullah Albadrani, Omar Alomair, Bashaeer Abdullh Al Jalal, Mohammed Yousef Almulhim, Abdullah Alotaibi, Ehab Darwish
{"title":"First-Line Levofloxacin-Based Triple Therapy Versus Standard Bismuth-Based Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study","authors":"Abdulrhman Khaled Al Abdulqader,&nbsp;Turki Abdullah Alamri,&nbsp;Mahdi Abdullah Alhamad,&nbsp;Somaia Shehab El-Deen,&nbsp;Abdallah Essa,&nbsp;Raed Abdullah Alfayez,&nbsp;Baqer Mohammed Albaqshi,&nbsp;Adnan Salah Almajed,&nbsp;Mohammed Yousef Alhassan,&nbsp;Ali Essa,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdullah Albadrani,&nbsp;Omar Alomair,&nbsp;Bashaeer Abdullh Al Jalal,&nbsp;Mohammed Yousef Almulhim,&nbsp;Abdullah Alotaibi,&nbsp;Ehab Darwish","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Antibiotic resistance in Saudi Arabia has led to decreased efficacy of conventional triple therapy for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) eradication, prompting the development of alternative treatments like levofloxacin-based triple and bismuth-based quadruple therapies. However, comparative data regarding its efficacy are lacking. Therefore, this study's goal was to compare the efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy with that of standard bismuth-based quadruple therapy as first-line regimens.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective analysis included 197 treatment-naïve adults with <i>H. pylori</i> infection who received levofloxacin-based triple (levofloxacin + amoxicillin + PPI) therapy (<i>n</i> = 81) or standard bismuth-based quadruple (bismuth + tetracycline + metronidazole + PPI) therapy (<i>n</i> = 116). <i>H. pylori</i> eradication was evaluated 4–8 weeks after medication administration using the <sup>13</sup>C-urea breath test, and variables that could affect the rate of success were examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no differences between groups in terms of age, sex, nationality, or type of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) used. The bismuth-based quadruple therapy group exhibited a markedly superior success rate compared to the levofloxacin-based triple therapy group when the latter was administered for 7 or 10 days (81.03% vs. 6.66%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, and 81.03% vs. 36.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). However, when the levofloxacin-based triple therapy was extended to 14 days, its <i>H. pylori</i> eradication rate became comparable to that of the 10-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (81.03% vs. 80%, <i>p</i> = 0.898). Eradication rates for both regimens were similar for patients aged ≥ 60, non-Saudi, when using omeprazole and those treated with levofloxacin-based triple therapy for 14 days.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Quadruple treatment based on bismuth is superior to triple therapy based on levofloxacin for eradicating <i>H. pylori</i> in Saudi Arabia and should be used as a first-line treatment. However, the 14-day levofloxacin-based triple treatment had an <i>H. pylori</i> eradication rate comparable to that of the 10-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70432","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Antibiotic resistance in Saudi Arabia has led to decreased efficacy of conventional triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, prompting the development of alternative treatments like levofloxacin-based triple and bismuth-based quadruple therapies. However, comparative data regarding its efficacy are lacking. Therefore, this study's goal was to compare the efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy with that of standard bismuth-based quadruple therapy as first-line regimens.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 197 treatment-naïve adults with H. pylori infection who received levofloxacin-based triple (levofloxacin + amoxicillin + PPI) therapy (n = 81) or standard bismuth-based quadruple (bismuth + tetracycline + metronidazole + PPI) therapy (n = 116). H. pylori eradication was evaluated 4–8 weeks after medication administration using the 13C-urea breath test, and variables that could affect the rate of success were examined.

Results

There were no differences between groups in terms of age, sex, nationality, or type of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) used. The bismuth-based quadruple therapy group exhibited a markedly superior success rate compared to the levofloxacin-based triple therapy group when the latter was administered for 7 or 10 days (81.03% vs. 6.66%, p < 0.001, and 81.03% vs. 36.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). However, when the levofloxacin-based triple therapy was extended to 14 days, its H. pylori eradication rate became comparable to that of the 10-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (81.03% vs. 80%, p = 0.898). Eradication rates for both regimens were similar for patients aged ≥ 60, non-Saudi, when using omeprazole and those treated with levofloxacin-based triple therapy for 14 days.

Conclusion

Quadruple treatment based on bismuth is superior to triple therapy based on levofloxacin for eradicating H. pylori in Saudi Arabia and should be used as a first-line treatment. However, the 14-day levofloxacin-based triple treatment had an H. pylori eradication rate comparable to that of the 10-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯以左氧氟沙星为基础的一线三联疗法与以铋为基础的标准四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌:一项回顾性单中心研究
背景和目的沙特阿拉伯的抗生素耐药性导致传统三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)的疗效下降,促使以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法和以铋为基础的四联疗法等替代疗法的发展。然而,缺乏关于其有效性的比较数据。因此,本研究的目的是比较以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法与以铋为基础的标准四联疗法作为一线方案的疗效。方法回顾性分析197例treatment-naïve成人幽门螺杆菌感染患者,接受左氧氟沙星三联(左氧氟沙星+阿莫西林+ PPI)治疗(n = 81)或标准铋四联(铋+四环素+甲硝唑+ PPI)治疗(n = 116)。使用13c -尿素呼气试验评估给药后4-8周幽门螺杆菌根除情况,并检查可能影响成功率的变量。结果两组患者在年龄、性别、国籍、使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)类型等方面均无差异。当给药7天或10天时,以铋为基础的四联治疗组的成功率明显优于以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联治疗组(分别为81.03%对6.66%,p <; 0.001和81.03%对36.1%,p < 0.001)。然而,当以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法延长至14天时,其幽门螺杆菌根除率与以铋为基础的10天四联疗法相当(81.03% vs. 80%, p = 0.898)。对于年龄≥60岁的非沙特患者,当使用奥美拉唑和接受左氧氟沙星三联疗法14天时,两种方案的根除率相似。结论在沙特阿拉伯,以铋为基础的四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的效果优于以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法,应作为一线治疗方法。然而,以左氧氟沙星为基础的14天三联治疗的幽门螺杆菌根除率与以铋为基础的10天四联治疗相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trends in Early-Onset Cancer Incidence Rates in Latin America: A Scoping Review Protocol. Association of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios With Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Case-Control Study. Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life in Ghanaian Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study. Financing of Trauma and Burn Prevention and Care in Malawi: A Scoping Review. Investigating the Association Between Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and Body Mass Index (BMI) With In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Outcomes Among Iranian Women: A Case-Control Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1