A Pilot Project to Create Awareness of Clinical Research Funding Streams Among Nurses and Allied Health Professionals in England

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1155/jonm/8855338
Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy, Lyndsey Rosson, Azita Rajai, Vanessa Heaslip, Heather Iles-Smith, Rosalie Magboo, Marcus Taylor, Sridhar Rathinam
{"title":"A Pilot Project to Create Awareness of Clinical Research Funding Streams Among Nurses and Allied Health Professionals in England","authors":"Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy,&nbsp;Lyndsey Rosson,&nbsp;Azita Rajai,&nbsp;Vanessa Heaslip,&nbsp;Heather Iles-Smith,&nbsp;Rosalie Magboo,&nbsp;Marcus Taylor,&nbsp;Sridhar Rathinam","doi":"10.1155/jonm/8855338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> A culturally diverse research workforce benefits patients, the community and the population as patients see health and care professionals who are like them and can build trusting relationships. From our experience, ethnic minority group nurses are less likely to attend research-related workshops and have significantly less awareness about clinical research funding and career pathways. This pilot project aimed to create awareness of clinical research terminology, methods and funding streams among ethnic minorities cardiothoracic nurses and allied health professionals (NAHPs) across specific geographical locations in England.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Participants were invited using social media platforms to attend a research masterclass at various locations across England and 211 were registered but 92 attended. They were also invited to complete a pre- and postworkshop questionnaire to determine their understanding of the topics being taught during the masterclass. Data were collected and then compared before and after the masterclass.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 63 out of 92 participants completed the workshop evaluation. There were 88% female and 11% male participants, aged 18 to 60+ years with different educational backgrounds. The participant’s pre- and postresearch theory and skills knowledge demonstrated some significant changes after attending the Masterclass on understanding research terminologies (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), how study aims, and objectives determine the study methodology (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and the difference between qualitative and quantitative research (<i>p</i> = 0.012). We also asked about the overall experience (98% said 10 out of 10), structure of the workshop (98% said 9 out of 10), venue, food and drinks (95% said 8 out of 10), communication/organisation (98% said 10 out of 10) and relevance of the workshops (100% said 10 out 10).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our study findings suggest that raising awareness about research careers, local/national funding opportunities and research masterclasses can improve NAHPs awareness of opportunities to gain skills and confidence in leading their own research to answer pertinent clinical and care questions related to their practice and ultimately improve patient care. In addition, this study identifies the gap in clinical research and funding among clinical staff, which is crucial for advancing evidence-based practice. Encouraging clinical healthcare staff to engage in clinical research will help foster an evidence-based culture.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/8855338","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/8855338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A culturally diverse research workforce benefits patients, the community and the population as patients see health and care professionals who are like them and can build trusting relationships. From our experience, ethnic minority group nurses are less likely to attend research-related workshops and have significantly less awareness about clinical research funding and career pathways. This pilot project aimed to create awareness of clinical research terminology, methods and funding streams among ethnic minorities cardiothoracic nurses and allied health professionals (NAHPs) across specific geographical locations in England.

Methods: Participants were invited using social media platforms to attend a research masterclass at various locations across England and 211 were registered but 92 attended. They were also invited to complete a pre- and postworkshop questionnaire to determine their understanding of the topics being taught during the masterclass. Data were collected and then compared before and after the masterclass.

Results: A total of 63 out of 92 participants completed the workshop evaluation. There were 88% female and 11% male participants, aged 18 to 60+ years with different educational backgrounds. The participant’s pre- and postresearch theory and skills knowledge demonstrated some significant changes after attending the Masterclass on understanding research terminologies (p < 0.001), how study aims, and objectives determine the study methodology (p < 0.001) and the difference between qualitative and quantitative research (p = 0.012). We also asked about the overall experience (98% said 10 out of 10), structure of the workshop (98% said 9 out of 10), venue, food and drinks (95% said 8 out of 10), communication/organisation (98% said 10 out of 10) and relevance of the workshops (100% said 10 out 10).

Conclusions: Our study findings suggest that raising awareness about research careers, local/national funding opportunities and research masterclasses can improve NAHPs awareness of opportunities to gain skills and confidence in leading their own research to answer pertinent clinical and care questions related to their practice and ultimately improve patient care. In addition, this study identifies the gap in clinical research and funding among clinical staff, which is crucial for advancing evidence-based practice. Encouraging clinical healthcare staff to engage in clinical research will help foster an evidence-based culture.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个试点项目,以创造意识的临床研究资金流护士和专职卫生专业人员在英格兰
背景:文化多元化的研究队伍有利于患者、社区和人群,因为患者看到的健康和护理专业人员与他们相似,可以建立信任关系。从我们的经验来看,少数民族护士不太可能参加与研究相关的研讨会,对临床研究资金和职业道路的认识也明显不足。该试点项目旨在提高英格兰特定地理位置的少数民族心胸科护士和联合保健专业人员(NAHPs)对临床研究术语、方法和资金流的认识。方法:使用社交媒体平台邀请参与者参加在英格兰不同地点举行的研究大师班,其中211人注册,92人参加。他们还被邀请完成一份研讨会前后的问卷调查,以确定他们对大师班所教授主题的理解。收集数据并对大师班前后进行比较。结果:92名参与者中有63人完成了工作坊评估。参与者中女性占88%,男性占11%,年龄在18岁至60岁以上,教育背景不同。在参加了研究术语理解大师班后,参与者在研究前和研究后的理论和技能知识表现出一些显著的变化(p <;0.001),研究目的和目标如何决定研究方法(p <;0.001)以及定性和定量研究之间的差异(p = 0.012)。我们还询问了总体体验(98%的人说10分)、研讨会的结构(98%的人说9分)、场地、食品和饮料(95%的人说8分)、沟通/组织(98%的人说10分)和研讨会的相关性(100%的人说10分)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,提高对研究职业、地方/国家资助机会和研究大师班的认识,可以提高NAHPs对获得技能和信心的机会的认识,从而领导他们自己的研究,回答与他们的实践相关的临床和护理问题,最终改善患者护理。此外,本研究确定了临床研究和临床工作人员之间的资金差距,这对推进循证实践至关重要。鼓励临床医护人员参与临床研究将有助于培养循证文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
Workplace Barriers to Nursing Autonomy in Saudi Hospitals: Implications for Management and Policy Under Vision 2030 The Mechanism of Ethical Leadership’s Influence on Nurses’ Voice Behavior: An Empirical Study Based on a Chain Mediation Model A Qualitative Exploratory Study of Patient Safety and Nurses’ Body Awareness Using Motion-Capture-Linked Avatars Exploring the Role of the Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP) Older Persons From the Perspective of the Interdisciplinary Team Artificial Intelligence Attitudes and Time Management Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1