Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments

IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1111/fcre.12842
Terry Singh, Traci Bannister, Marc Massie
{"title":"Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments","authors":"Terry Singh,&nbsp;Traci Bannister,&nbsp;Marc Massie","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Canada, the federal <i>Divorce Act</i> was revised in 2021 to include enumerated best interests factors which include a child's linguistic, religious, cultural, and spiritual heritage and upbringing, including Indigenous heritage. In this study, the authors examine how Canadian courtrooms engaged in the consideration of cultural factors prior to the recent <i>Divorce Act</i> amendments and compare these findings to decisions published following the amendments that mandated this specific consideration. Specific manners in which the courts have considered culture are identified, and the resulting three ‘clusters’ of decisions—including those cases (a) prioritizing a child's established culture, (b) weighing the child's greater involvement with one culture versus increased bicultural competence, and (c) considering the effect on the child of the cultural interaction—are compared pre- and post- the recent <i>Divorce Act</i> amendments. Implications for family court professionals are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"36-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Canada, the federal Divorce Act was revised in 2021 to include enumerated best interests factors which include a child's linguistic, religious, cultural, and spiritual heritage and upbringing, including Indigenous heritage. In this study, the authors examine how Canadian courtrooms engaged in the consideration of cultural factors prior to the recent Divorce Act amendments and compare these findings to decisions published following the amendments that mandated this specific consideration. Specific manners in which the courts have considered culture are identified, and the resulting three ‘clusters’ of decisions—including those cases (a) prioritizing a child's established culture, (b) weighing the child's greater involvement with one culture versus increased bicultural competence, and (c) considering the effect on the child of the cultural interaction—are compared pre- and post- the recent Divorce Act amendments. Implications for family court professionals are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对加拿大法庭文化的思考:《离婚法》修订前后
在加拿大,联邦《离婚法》于2021年进行了修订,纳入了列举的最佳利益因素,其中包括儿童的语言、宗教、文化和精神遗产和教养,包括土著遗产。在这项研究中,作者考察了加拿大法院在最近的《离婚法》修正案之前是如何考虑文化因素的,并将这些发现与强制考虑这一具体因素的修正案之后公布的裁决进行了比较。确定了法院考虑文化的具体方式,以及由此产生的三种“集群”判决-包括以下情况(a)优先考虑儿童的既定文化,(b)权衡儿童与一种文化的更多参与与增加的双文化能力,以及(c)考虑文化互动对儿童的影响-在最近的离婚法修正案之前和之后进行了比较。讨论了对家庭法庭专业人员的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Building the evidence for family treatment courts: Reunification and permanency in an urban court in the southwest Building bridges, breaking silos: Celebrating the legacy of Marsha Kline Pruett Transitions between homes in parenting plans: A Canadian perspective on legal considerations The next frontier of parent–child contact problems-the wild-west of court-ordered reunification therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1