Failure of formalization: State protection of employer interests and consequences for domestic workers' organizing in India

IF 0.8 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropology of Work Review Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1111/awr.12276
Maansi Parpiani
{"title":"Failure of formalization: State protection of employer interests and consequences for domestic workers' organizing in India","authors":"Maansi Parpiani","doi":"10.1111/awr.12276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the demand for, creation and ultimate failure of a legislation aimed at formalizing domestic workers in Mumbai, India. The paper is based on an analysis of parliamentary discussions on the legislation process and ethnographic fieldwork with diverse groups of domestic workers undertaken between 2014 and 2021. I critique the claim that formalization policies are merely ill-suited to the norms or complexities of domestic work. Instead, I argue that formalization fails because the state drafts laws that actively protect the interest of domestic workers' employers, rather than domestic workers. In drafting a piece of legislation that creates no obligations on employers and offers few immediate benefits to workers, I locate its failure in the context of widespread labor deregulation and a shrinking formal sector in India. Crafting such a law, the state plays a partisan role and stems the momentum of further domestic worker organizing in Mumbai.</p>","PeriodicalId":43035,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology of Work Review","volume":"45 2","pages":"100-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology of Work Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/awr.12276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the demand for, creation and ultimate failure of a legislation aimed at formalizing domestic workers in Mumbai, India. The paper is based on an analysis of parliamentary discussions on the legislation process and ethnographic fieldwork with diverse groups of domestic workers undertaken between 2014 and 2021. I critique the claim that formalization policies are merely ill-suited to the norms or complexities of domestic work. Instead, I argue that formalization fails because the state drafts laws that actively protect the interest of domestic workers' employers, rather than domestic workers. In drafting a piece of legislation that creates no obligations on employers and offers few immediate benefits to workers, I locate its failure in the context of widespread labor deregulation and a shrinking formal sector in India. Crafting such a law, the state plays a partisan role and stems the momentum of further domestic worker organizing in Mumbai.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正规化的失败:国家对雇主利益的保护及其对印度家政工人组织的影响
本文考察了印度孟买一项旨在使家政工人正规化的立法的需求、创造和最终失败。本文基于对2014年至2021年期间对不同家庭工人群体进行的立法程序和民族志实地调查的议会讨论的分析。我批评这种说法,即正规化政策仅仅不适合家庭工作的规范或复杂性。相反,我认为,正规化之所以失败,是因为国家起草的法律积极地保护了家政工人雇主的利益,而不是家政工人的利益。在起草一项对雇主没有任何义务,也没有给工人带来多少直接好处的立法时,我认为它的失败是在印度普遍放松劳工管制和正规部门萎缩的背景下进行的。在制定这样一项法律时,该邦扮演了党派角色,并遏制了孟买家政工人进一步组织起来的势头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Futures of Transit Work: Contesting Devaluation and Neoliberal Automation in Bus Transit Issue Information Notes From the Editorial Collective “Don't Complain”: Labor Anxiety, Racial Ideologies, and Moral Micromanagement in Rural South Carolina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1