Challenges of cannabidiol determination in emulsified cosmetics and application of solid-phase extraction followed by HPLC-UV-MS/MS

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1007/s00216-024-05716-9
Magdaléna Vágnerová, David Sýkora, Alžběta Nemeškalová, Martin Kuchař
{"title":"Challenges of cannabidiol determination in emulsified cosmetics and application of solid-phase extraction followed by HPLC-UV-MS/MS","authors":"Magdaléna Vágnerová,&nbsp;David Sýkora,&nbsp;Alžběta Nemeškalová,&nbsp;Martin Kuchař","doi":"10.1007/s00216-024-05716-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The recent surge in popularity of cannabidiol-infused products extends beyond food and supplements to the cosmetic industry. Accurate labeling remains a significant concern, as many products fail to meet advertised cannabidiol content and/or contain psychoactive tetrahydrocannabinol above the permissible levels. In this work, we present the use of an HPLC-UV-MS/MS method for the quantification of five major cannabinoids (cannabidiol, cannabidiolic acid, tetrahydrocannabinol, tetrahydrocannabinolic acid, and cannabigerol) in oil-in-water cosmetic emulsions. The sample extraction is based on dispersing the sample in isopropanol, followed by solid-phase extraction using Bond Elut Plexa PAX cartridge. The viability of this method is demonstrated by comparing matrix effects in samples subjected to solid-phase extraction (0‒11% suppression of cannabidiol ionization) to samples extracted without additional purification steps (0‒84% ionization suppression of cannabidiol ionization). The limit of quantification is determined at 0.1 mg/g and the calibration is employed in the range of 0.1‒50 mg/g for cannabidiol and 0.1‒10 mg/g for all other analytes. Finally, 36 real cosmetic samples from the Czech market were analyzed. Of these, 14 indicated the amount of CBD on the label but only five (36%) were accurate, i.e., within 90‒110% of the labeled amount, and a considerable amount of THC (0.16 ± 0.01 mg/g) was found in one sample. These findings contribute to the cumulating evidence that cannabidiol-based consumer products are often mislabeled and highlight the importance of better regulatory compliance.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":"417 6","pages":"1153 - 1163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-024-05716-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent surge in popularity of cannabidiol-infused products extends beyond food and supplements to the cosmetic industry. Accurate labeling remains a significant concern, as many products fail to meet advertised cannabidiol content and/or contain psychoactive tetrahydrocannabinol above the permissible levels. In this work, we present the use of an HPLC-UV-MS/MS method for the quantification of five major cannabinoids (cannabidiol, cannabidiolic acid, tetrahydrocannabinol, tetrahydrocannabinolic acid, and cannabigerol) in oil-in-water cosmetic emulsions. The sample extraction is based on dispersing the sample in isopropanol, followed by solid-phase extraction using Bond Elut Plexa PAX cartridge. The viability of this method is demonstrated by comparing matrix effects in samples subjected to solid-phase extraction (0‒11% suppression of cannabidiol ionization) to samples extracted without additional purification steps (0‒84% ionization suppression of cannabidiol ionization). The limit of quantification is determined at 0.1 mg/g and the calibration is employed in the range of 0.1‒50 mg/g for cannabidiol and 0.1‒10 mg/g for all other analytes. Finally, 36 real cosmetic samples from the Czech market were analyzed. Of these, 14 indicated the amount of CBD on the label but only five (36%) were accurate, i.e., within 90‒110% of the labeled amount, and a considerable amount of THC (0.16 ± 0.01 mg/g) was found in one sample. These findings contribute to the cumulating evidence that cannabidiol-based consumer products are often mislabeled and highlight the importance of better regulatory compliance.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳化化妆品中大麻二酚含量测定的挑战及固相萃取- HPLC-UV-MS/MS的应用。
最近,注入大麻二酚的产品的受欢迎程度激增,从食品和补充剂延伸到化妆品行业。准确的标签仍然是一个重大问题,因为许多产品未能达到广告中的大麻二酚含量和/或含有高于允许水平的精神活性四氢大麻酚。在这项工作中,我们提出了使用HPLC-UV-MS/MS方法定量五种主要大麻素(大麻二酚,大麻二酸,四氢大麻酚,四氢大麻酚酸和大麻酚)在水包油化妆品乳液。样品提取是基于将样品分散在异丙醇中,然后使用Bond Elut Plexa PAX墨盒进行固相萃取。通过比较固相萃取(0-11%大麻二酚电离抑制)和未经额外纯化步骤提取的样品(0-84%大麻二酚电离抑制)中的基质效应,证明了该方法的可行性。定量限确定为0.1 mg/g,大麻二酚的校准范围为0.1 - 50mg /g,所有其他分析物的校准范围为0.1 - 10mg /g。最后,对来自捷克市场的36个化妆品样品进行了分析。其中,有14份标明了标签上CBD的含量,但只有5份(36%)是准确的,即在标签含量的90-110%范围内,其中一份样品中发现了相当数量的THC(0.16±0.01 mg/g)。这些发现提供了越来越多的证据,证明基于大麻二酚的消费品经常被贴错标签,并强调了更好地遵守监管的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
期刊最新文献
Real-time sensing of acetaldehyde in the headspace of yeast cultures using mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy. Innovative analytical techniques used for the investigation of extra virgin olive oil. Microfluidic device for electromembrane extraction with a micro-pillar stabilized liquid membrane. A simple LC-MS/MS alternative for arsenic monitoring in groundwater: validation and field application. A streamlined in-syringe fast drug extraction and semi-automated dispersive cleanup technique for quick biomonitoring of direct oral anti-coagulant drugs in patients' plasma samples using UHPLC-MS/MS analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1